Cargando…

Finding the gap: An empirical study of the most effective shots in elite goalball

This research identifies which shots types in goalball are most likely to lead to a goal and herby provides background information for improving training and competition. Therefore, we observed 117 elite level matches including 20,541 shots played in the regular situation (3 vs. 3) using notational...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Link, Daniel, Weber, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5919681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29698479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196679
_version_ 1783317683366789120
author Link, Daniel
Weber, Christoph
author_facet Link, Daniel
Weber, Christoph
author_sort Link, Daniel
collection PubMed
description This research identifies which shots types in goalball are most likely to lead to a goal and herby provides background information for improving training and competition. Therefore, we observed 117 elite level matches including 20,541 shots played in the regular situation (3 vs. 3) using notational analysis. We characterized the shots by using their target sector (A-E), technique (traditional, rotation), trajectory (flat, bounce), angle (straight, diagonal and outcome (goal, violation, out, blocked). In our data, a χ(2)-test showed a significantly higher goal rate for men (3.9%) compared to women (3.0%). For men, we found a significantly higher goal rate in the intersection sectors between players C (5.6%), D (4.9%), and in the outer sector A. In sector A, goal rate was higher only for straight shots (6.6%). Technique and trajectory did not affect goal rate for men, but flat shots showed a higher violation rate (3.2%) compared to bounce shouts (2.0%). In women's goalball, goal rate was higher only on sector D (4.4%). Bounce-rotation shots were the most successful (5.5%). We conclude that men should focus on shots to sectors C and D (called pocket) and straight shots to sector A, as long as there are no other tactical considerations. Women should shoot primarily towards the pocket. It might also be worth playing more bounce-rotation shots and practicing them in training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5919681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59196812018-05-11 Finding the gap: An empirical study of the most effective shots in elite goalball Link, Daniel Weber, Christoph PLoS One Research Article This research identifies which shots types in goalball are most likely to lead to a goal and herby provides background information for improving training and competition. Therefore, we observed 117 elite level matches including 20,541 shots played in the regular situation (3 vs. 3) using notational analysis. We characterized the shots by using their target sector (A-E), technique (traditional, rotation), trajectory (flat, bounce), angle (straight, diagonal and outcome (goal, violation, out, blocked). In our data, a χ(2)-test showed a significantly higher goal rate for men (3.9%) compared to women (3.0%). For men, we found a significantly higher goal rate in the intersection sectors between players C (5.6%), D (4.9%), and in the outer sector A. In sector A, goal rate was higher only for straight shots (6.6%). Technique and trajectory did not affect goal rate for men, but flat shots showed a higher violation rate (3.2%) compared to bounce shouts (2.0%). In women's goalball, goal rate was higher only on sector D (4.4%). Bounce-rotation shots were the most successful (5.5%). We conclude that men should focus on shots to sectors C and D (called pocket) and straight shots to sector A, as long as there are no other tactical considerations. Women should shoot primarily towards the pocket. It might also be worth playing more bounce-rotation shots and practicing them in training. Public Library of Science 2018-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5919681/ /pubmed/29698479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196679 Text en © 2018 Link, Weber http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Link, Daniel
Weber, Christoph
Finding the gap: An empirical study of the most effective shots in elite goalball
title Finding the gap: An empirical study of the most effective shots in elite goalball
title_full Finding the gap: An empirical study of the most effective shots in elite goalball
title_fullStr Finding the gap: An empirical study of the most effective shots in elite goalball
title_full_unstemmed Finding the gap: An empirical study of the most effective shots in elite goalball
title_short Finding the gap: An empirical study of the most effective shots in elite goalball
title_sort finding the gap: an empirical study of the most effective shots in elite goalball
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5919681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29698479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196679
work_keys_str_mv AT linkdaniel findingthegapanempiricalstudyofthemosteffectiveshotsinelitegoalball
AT weberchristoph findingthegapanempiricalstudyofthemosteffectiveshotsinelitegoalball