Cargando…

Endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor MMR status

OBJECTIVE: The risk of developing endometrial cancer (EC) and/or survival following a diagnosis of EC might differ by tumor DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status. We assessed the association between tumor MMR status (classified as MMR-proficient, somatic MMR-deficient, germline MMR-deficient) and the ris...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagle, Christina M., O'Mara, Tracy A., Tan, Yen, Buchanan, Daniel D., Obermair, Andreas, Blomfield, Penny, Quinn, Michael A., Webb, Penelope M., Spurdle, Amanda B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5920223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29533022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e39
_version_ 1783317792753188864
author Nagle, Christina M.
O'Mara, Tracy A.
Tan, Yen
Buchanan, Daniel D.
Obermair, Andreas
Blomfield, Penny
Quinn, Michael A.
Webb, Penelope M.
Spurdle, Amanda B.
author_facet Nagle, Christina M.
O'Mara, Tracy A.
Tan, Yen
Buchanan, Daniel D.
Obermair, Andreas
Blomfield, Penny
Quinn, Michael A.
Webb, Penelope M.
Spurdle, Amanda B.
author_sort Nagle, Christina M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The risk of developing endometrial cancer (EC) and/or survival following a diagnosis of EC might differ by tumor DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status. We assessed the association between tumor MMR status (classified as MMR-proficient, somatic MMR-deficient, germline MMR-deficient) and the risk of developing EC and survival following a diagnosis of EC. METHODS: We analyzed data from women who participated in the Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study (ANECS) conducted between 2005 and 2007. Risk analyses (698 cases/691 population controls) utilized sociodemographic and lifestyle information obtained from telephone interviews at recruitment. For survival analyses (728 cases), patients' clinical data was abstracted from medical records, and survival data were obtained via linkage with the Australian National Death Index. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the associations between tumor MMR status and EC risk, and proportional hazards models to perform survival analyses with adjustment of known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Established risk factors for EC did not differ significantly by tumor MMR status. In analyses including all EC subtypes, overall and EC-specific survival did not differ by tumor MMR status. Among women with the most common endometrioid subtype, EC-specific survival was worse for women with somatic MMR-deficient EC compared to women with MMR-proficient EC (hazard ratio [HR]=2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.19–4.01). CONCLUSION: The risk of EC is not associated with MMR status. Accurate separation of germline from somatic causes of MMR deficiency suggests that patients with endometrioid subtype somatic MMR-deficient tumors have poorer EC-specific survival than those with MMR-proficient tumors, after accounting for other prognostic factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5920223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59202232018-05-01 Endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor MMR status Nagle, Christina M. O'Mara, Tracy A. Tan, Yen Buchanan, Daniel D. Obermair, Andreas Blomfield, Penny Quinn, Michael A. Webb, Penelope M. Spurdle, Amanda B. J Gynecol Oncol Original Article OBJECTIVE: The risk of developing endometrial cancer (EC) and/or survival following a diagnosis of EC might differ by tumor DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status. We assessed the association between tumor MMR status (classified as MMR-proficient, somatic MMR-deficient, germline MMR-deficient) and the risk of developing EC and survival following a diagnosis of EC. METHODS: We analyzed data from women who participated in the Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study (ANECS) conducted between 2005 and 2007. Risk analyses (698 cases/691 population controls) utilized sociodemographic and lifestyle information obtained from telephone interviews at recruitment. For survival analyses (728 cases), patients' clinical data was abstracted from medical records, and survival data were obtained via linkage with the Australian National Death Index. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the associations between tumor MMR status and EC risk, and proportional hazards models to perform survival analyses with adjustment of known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Established risk factors for EC did not differ significantly by tumor MMR status. In analyses including all EC subtypes, overall and EC-specific survival did not differ by tumor MMR status. Among women with the most common endometrioid subtype, EC-specific survival was worse for women with somatic MMR-deficient EC compared to women with MMR-proficient EC (hazard ratio [HR]=2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.19–4.01). CONCLUSION: The risk of EC is not associated with MMR status. Accurate separation of germline from somatic causes of MMR deficiency suggests that patients with endometrioid subtype somatic MMR-deficient tumors have poorer EC-specific survival than those with MMR-proficient tumors, after accounting for other prognostic factors. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2018-05 2018-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5920223/ /pubmed/29533022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e39 Text en Copyright © 2018. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nagle, Christina M.
O'Mara, Tracy A.
Tan, Yen
Buchanan, Daniel D.
Obermair, Andreas
Blomfield, Penny
Quinn, Michael A.
Webb, Penelope M.
Spurdle, Amanda B.
Endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor MMR status
title Endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor MMR status
title_full Endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor MMR status
title_fullStr Endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor MMR status
title_full_unstemmed Endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor MMR status
title_short Endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor MMR status
title_sort endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor mmr status
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5920223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29533022
http://dx.doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e39
work_keys_str_mv AT naglechristinam endometrialcancerriskandsurvivalbytumormmrstatus
AT omaratracya endometrialcancerriskandsurvivalbytumormmrstatus
AT tanyen endometrialcancerriskandsurvivalbytumormmrstatus
AT buchanandanield endometrialcancerriskandsurvivalbytumormmrstatus
AT obermairandreas endometrialcancerriskandsurvivalbytumormmrstatus
AT blomfieldpenny endometrialcancerriskandsurvivalbytumormmrstatus
AT quinnmichaela endometrialcancerriskandsurvivalbytumormmrstatus
AT webbpenelopem endometrialcancerriskandsurvivalbytumormmrstatus
AT spurdleamandab endometrialcancerriskandsurvivalbytumormmrstatus
AT endometrialcancerriskandsurvivalbytumormmrstatus