Cargando…

Effects of Menstrual and Reproductive Factors on the Risk of Breast Cancer: Meta‐analysis of the Case‐Control Studies in Japan

To elucidate the magnitude of the effect of menstrual and reproductive factors on breast cancer occurrence among Japanese women, we reviewed eight case‐control studies previously conducted in Japan and used a quantitative method (meta‐analysis) to summarize the data. While individual studies have di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagata, Chisato, Hu, Yao‐Hua, Shimizu, Hiroyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1995
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5920604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7493908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb03000.x
_version_ 1783317859104980992
author Nagata, Chisato
Hu, Yao‐Hua
Shimizu, Hiroyuki
author_facet Nagata, Chisato
Hu, Yao‐Hua
Shimizu, Hiroyuki
author_sort Nagata, Chisato
collection PubMed
description To elucidate the magnitude of the effect of menstrual and reproductive factors on breast cancer occurrence among Japanese women, we reviewed eight case‐control studies previously conducted in Japan and used a quantitative method (meta‐analysis) to summarize the data. While individual studies have different methods and populations, the estimated odds ratios (ORs) in the studies were statistically homogeneous for all study variables. It was confirmed that early age at menarche, late age at first birth, and premenopausal status are significantly associated with risk of breast cancer; an estimated combined OR of 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59‐0.77) was obtained for women with onset of menstruation after age 16 compared to those before age 14. Nulliparous women had higher risk than women with first birth before age 25 (OR=1.56 95%, CI: 1.27‐1.91). The OR for women with first birth after age 35 was 2.26 (95% CI: 1.85‐2.77) compared to women at first birth before age 25. Premenopausal women had a higher risk than women with menopause before age 50 (OR=2.21, 95% CI: 1.53‐3.20). We also found a significant protective effect of high parity after controlling for age at first birth and the other menstrual factors. The OR estimate for 3 or more births compared to nulliparity was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.54‐0.86). The meta‐analysis provided quantitative estimates of breast cancer risk among Japanese women with improved precision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5920604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1995
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59206042018-05-11 Effects of Menstrual and Reproductive Factors on the Risk of Breast Cancer: Meta‐analysis of the Case‐Control Studies in Japan Nagata, Chisato Hu, Yao‐Hua Shimizu, Hiroyuki Jpn J Cancer Res Article To elucidate the magnitude of the effect of menstrual and reproductive factors on breast cancer occurrence among Japanese women, we reviewed eight case‐control studies previously conducted in Japan and used a quantitative method (meta‐analysis) to summarize the data. While individual studies have different methods and populations, the estimated odds ratios (ORs) in the studies were statistically homogeneous for all study variables. It was confirmed that early age at menarche, late age at first birth, and premenopausal status are significantly associated with risk of breast cancer; an estimated combined OR of 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59‐0.77) was obtained for women with onset of menstruation after age 16 compared to those before age 14. Nulliparous women had higher risk than women with first birth before age 25 (OR=1.56 95%, CI: 1.27‐1.91). The OR for women with first birth after age 35 was 2.26 (95% CI: 1.85‐2.77) compared to women at first birth before age 25. Premenopausal women had a higher risk than women with menopause before age 50 (OR=2.21, 95% CI: 1.53‐3.20). We also found a significant protective effect of high parity after controlling for age at first birth and the other menstrual factors. The OR estimate for 3 or more births compared to nulliparity was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.54‐0.86). The meta‐analysis provided quantitative estimates of breast cancer risk among Japanese women with improved precision. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1995-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5920604/ /pubmed/7493908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb03000.x Text en
spellingShingle Article
Nagata, Chisato
Hu, Yao‐Hua
Shimizu, Hiroyuki
Effects of Menstrual and Reproductive Factors on the Risk of Breast Cancer: Meta‐analysis of the Case‐Control Studies in Japan
title Effects of Menstrual and Reproductive Factors on the Risk of Breast Cancer: Meta‐analysis of the Case‐Control Studies in Japan
title_full Effects of Menstrual and Reproductive Factors on the Risk of Breast Cancer: Meta‐analysis of the Case‐Control Studies in Japan
title_fullStr Effects of Menstrual and Reproductive Factors on the Risk of Breast Cancer: Meta‐analysis of the Case‐Control Studies in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Menstrual and Reproductive Factors on the Risk of Breast Cancer: Meta‐analysis of the Case‐Control Studies in Japan
title_short Effects of Menstrual and Reproductive Factors on the Risk of Breast Cancer: Meta‐analysis of the Case‐Control Studies in Japan
title_sort effects of menstrual and reproductive factors on the risk of breast cancer: meta‐analysis of the case‐control studies in japan
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5920604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7493908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb03000.x
work_keys_str_mv AT nagatachisato effectsofmenstrualandreproductivefactorsontheriskofbreastcancermetaanalysisofthecasecontrolstudiesinjapan
AT huyaohua effectsofmenstrualandreproductivefactorsontheriskofbreastcancermetaanalysisofthecasecontrolstudiesinjapan
AT shimizuhiroyuki effectsofmenstrualandreproductivefactorsontheriskofbreastcancermetaanalysisofthecasecontrolstudiesinjapan