Cargando…

Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice

Xenografts of a human malignant glioma subcutaneously transplanted into nude mice were irradiated with graded single doses (2, 5, 10 or 20 Gy) or five types of fractionation schedules in two weeks: conventional [20 Gy in 10 fractions (fr)], hyperfractionated [24 Gy in 20 fr (two fractions per day)],...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasegawa, Masatoshi, Niibe, Hideo, Mitsuhashi, Norio, Yamakawa, Michitaka, Kato, Shingo, Furuta, Masaya, Kazumoto, Tomoko, Hayakawa, Kazushige, Nakazato, Yoichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1995
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5920924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7591967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb03100.x
_version_ 1783317905391222784
author Hasegawa, Masatoshi
Niibe, Hideo
Mitsuhashi, Norio
Yamakawa, Michitaka
Kato, Shingo
Furuta, Masaya
Kazumoto, Tomoko
Hayakawa, Kazushige
Nakazato, Yoichi
author_facet Hasegawa, Masatoshi
Niibe, Hideo
Mitsuhashi, Norio
Yamakawa, Michitaka
Kato, Shingo
Furuta, Masaya
Kazumoto, Tomoko
Hayakawa, Kazushige
Nakazato, Yoichi
author_sort Hasegawa, Masatoshi
collection PubMed
description Xenografts of a human malignant glioma subcutaneously transplanted into nude mice were irradiated with graded single doses (2, 5, 10 or 20 Gy) or five types of fractionation schedules in two weeks: conventional [20 Gy in 10 fractions (fr)], hyperfractionated [24 Gy in 20 fr (two fractions per day)], and hypofractionated‐1, 2, 3 [20 Gy, 18 Gy, 16 Gy in 4 fr]. All of the fractionated irradiation groups showed tumor regression. The hypofractionation‐1 group (20 Gy in 4 fr) demonstrated the most prominent tumor regression, while the hyperfractionation group (24 Gy in 20 fr) showed the least effect. The hypofractionation‐2 group (18 Gy in 4 fr) showed similar regression to the conventional fractionation group (20 Gy in 10 fr). Histologically, tumors in the control groups consisted of a homogenous population of small anaplastic cells, and only a small number of tumor cells were glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)‐positive. Following irradiation, the population of small anaplastic cells decreased and the percentage of GFAP‐positive cells increased. Cellular pleomorphism became much more prominent after irradiation in all of the fractionated irradiation groups as compared with the graded single dose irradiation groups. In this study, hyperfractionation was not effective against human glioma xenografts compared with conventional fractionation and hypofractionation. This indicates that care is needed in applying hyperfractionation regimens to human malignant gliomas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5920924
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1995
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59209242018-05-11 Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice Hasegawa, Masatoshi Niibe, Hideo Mitsuhashi, Norio Yamakawa, Michitaka Kato, Shingo Furuta, Masaya Kazumoto, Tomoko Hayakawa, Kazushige Nakazato, Yoichi Jpn J Cancer Res Article Xenografts of a human malignant glioma subcutaneously transplanted into nude mice were irradiated with graded single doses (2, 5, 10 or 20 Gy) or five types of fractionation schedules in two weeks: conventional [20 Gy in 10 fractions (fr)], hyperfractionated [24 Gy in 20 fr (two fractions per day)], and hypofractionated‐1, 2, 3 [20 Gy, 18 Gy, 16 Gy in 4 fr]. All of the fractionated irradiation groups showed tumor regression. The hypofractionation‐1 group (20 Gy in 4 fr) demonstrated the most prominent tumor regression, while the hyperfractionation group (24 Gy in 20 fr) showed the least effect. The hypofractionation‐2 group (18 Gy in 4 fr) showed similar regression to the conventional fractionation group (20 Gy in 10 fr). Histologically, tumors in the control groups consisted of a homogenous population of small anaplastic cells, and only a small number of tumor cells were glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)‐positive. Following irradiation, the population of small anaplastic cells decreased and the percentage of GFAP‐positive cells increased. Cellular pleomorphism became much more prominent after irradiation in all of the fractionated irradiation groups as compared with the graded single dose irradiation groups. In this study, hyperfractionation was not effective against human glioma xenografts compared with conventional fractionation and hypofractionation. This indicates that care is needed in applying hyperfractionation regimens to human malignant gliomas. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1995-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5920924/ /pubmed/7591967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb03100.x Text en
spellingShingle Article
Hasegawa, Masatoshi
Niibe, Hideo
Mitsuhashi, Norio
Yamakawa, Michitaka
Kato, Shingo
Furuta, Masaya
Kazumoto, Tomoko
Hayakawa, Kazushige
Nakazato, Yoichi
Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice
title Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice
title_full Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice
title_fullStr Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice
title_full_unstemmed Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice
title_short Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice
title_sort hyperfractionated and hypofractionated radiation therapy for human malignant glioma xenograft in nude mice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5920924/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7591967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb03100.x
work_keys_str_mv AT hasegawamasatoshi hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice
AT niibehideo hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice
AT mitsuhashinorio hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice
AT yamakawamichitaka hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice
AT katoshingo hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice
AT furutamasaya hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice
AT kazumototomoko hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice
AT hayakawakazushige hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice
AT nakazatoyoichi hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice