Cargando…
Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice
Xenografts of a human malignant glioma subcutaneously transplanted into nude mice were irradiated with graded single doses (2, 5, 10 or 20 Gy) or five types of fractionation schedules in two weeks: conventional [20 Gy in 10 fractions (fr)], hyperfractionated [24 Gy in 20 fr (two fractions per day)],...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
1995
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5920924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7591967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb03100.x |
_version_ | 1783317905391222784 |
---|---|
author | Hasegawa, Masatoshi Niibe, Hideo Mitsuhashi, Norio Yamakawa, Michitaka Kato, Shingo Furuta, Masaya Kazumoto, Tomoko Hayakawa, Kazushige Nakazato, Yoichi |
author_facet | Hasegawa, Masatoshi Niibe, Hideo Mitsuhashi, Norio Yamakawa, Michitaka Kato, Shingo Furuta, Masaya Kazumoto, Tomoko Hayakawa, Kazushige Nakazato, Yoichi |
author_sort | Hasegawa, Masatoshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Xenografts of a human malignant glioma subcutaneously transplanted into nude mice were irradiated with graded single doses (2, 5, 10 or 20 Gy) or five types of fractionation schedules in two weeks: conventional [20 Gy in 10 fractions (fr)], hyperfractionated [24 Gy in 20 fr (two fractions per day)], and hypofractionated‐1, 2, 3 [20 Gy, 18 Gy, 16 Gy in 4 fr]. All of the fractionated irradiation groups showed tumor regression. The hypofractionation‐1 group (20 Gy in 4 fr) demonstrated the most prominent tumor regression, while the hyperfractionation group (24 Gy in 20 fr) showed the least effect. The hypofractionation‐2 group (18 Gy in 4 fr) showed similar regression to the conventional fractionation group (20 Gy in 10 fr). Histologically, tumors in the control groups consisted of a homogenous population of small anaplastic cells, and only a small number of tumor cells were glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)‐positive. Following irradiation, the population of small anaplastic cells decreased and the percentage of GFAP‐positive cells increased. Cellular pleomorphism became much more prominent after irradiation in all of the fractionated irradiation groups as compared with the graded single dose irradiation groups. In this study, hyperfractionation was not effective against human glioma xenografts compared with conventional fractionation and hypofractionation. This indicates that care is needed in applying hyperfractionation regimens to human malignant gliomas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5920924 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 1995 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59209242018-05-11 Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice Hasegawa, Masatoshi Niibe, Hideo Mitsuhashi, Norio Yamakawa, Michitaka Kato, Shingo Furuta, Masaya Kazumoto, Tomoko Hayakawa, Kazushige Nakazato, Yoichi Jpn J Cancer Res Article Xenografts of a human malignant glioma subcutaneously transplanted into nude mice were irradiated with graded single doses (2, 5, 10 or 20 Gy) or five types of fractionation schedules in two weeks: conventional [20 Gy in 10 fractions (fr)], hyperfractionated [24 Gy in 20 fr (two fractions per day)], and hypofractionated‐1, 2, 3 [20 Gy, 18 Gy, 16 Gy in 4 fr]. All of the fractionated irradiation groups showed tumor regression. The hypofractionation‐1 group (20 Gy in 4 fr) demonstrated the most prominent tumor regression, while the hyperfractionation group (24 Gy in 20 fr) showed the least effect. The hypofractionation‐2 group (18 Gy in 4 fr) showed similar regression to the conventional fractionation group (20 Gy in 10 fr). Histologically, tumors in the control groups consisted of a homogenous population of small anaplastic cells, and only a small number of tumor cells were glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)‐positive. Following irradiation, the population of small anaplastic cells decreased and the percentage of GFAP‐positive cells increased. Cellular pleomorphism became much more prominent after irradiation in all of the fractionated irradiation groups as compared with the graded single dose irradiation groups. In this study, hyperfractionation was not effective against human glioma xenografts compared with conventional fractionation and hypofractionation. This indicates that care is needed in applying hyperfractionation regimens to human malignant gliomas. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1995-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5920924/ /pubmed/7591967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb03100.x Text en |
spellingShingle | Article Hasegawa, Masatoshi Niibe, Hideo Mitsuhashi, Norio Yamakawa, Michitaka Kato, Shingo Furuta, Masaya Kazumoto, Tomoko Hayakawa, Kazushige Nakazato, Yoichi Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice |
title | Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice |
title_full | Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice |
title_fullStr | Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice |
title_full_unstemmed | Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice |
title_short | Hyperfractionated and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Human Malignant Glioma Xenograft in Nude Mice |
title_sort | hyperfractionated and hypofractionated radiation therapy for human malignant glioma xenograft in nude mice |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5920924/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7591967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1995.tb03100.x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hasegawamasatoshi hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice AT niibehideo hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice AT mitsuhashinorio hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice AT yamakawamichitaka hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice AT katoshingo hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice AT furutamasaya hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice AT kazumototomoko hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice AT hayakawakazushige hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice AT nakazatoyoichi hyperfractionatedandhypofractionatedradiationtherapyforhumanmalignantgliomaxenograftinnudemice |