Cargando…

Serological Evaluation of Soluble CD44 in Renal Cancer

In this study, we examined the feasibility of using elevated serum CD44 concentration as an indicator in renal cancer. We performed enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays using 63 sera obtained from 47 patients with renal cancer and 16 healthy controls and evaluated the clinico‐pathological parameters....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kan, Masaharu, Kanayama, Hiro‐omi, Naruo, Seiichi, Tsuji, Masahito, Kojima, Keiji, Kurokawa, Yasushi, Kagawa, Susumu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1996
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5921015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9045950
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1996.tb03131.x
Descripción
Sumario:In this study, we examined the feasibility of using elevated serum CD44 concentration as an indicator in renal cancer. We performed enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assays using 63 sera obtained from 47 patients with renal cancer and 16 healthy controls and evaluated the clinico‐pathological parameters. The concentration of soluble CD44 standard (sCD44std), indicating the concentration of all circulating CD44 isoforms, was significantly higher in renal cancer patients than in normal individuals (745±170 ng/ml vs. 563±159 ng/ml, P=0.001). The concentration of soluble CD44 splice isoforms sharing exon v6 (sCD44v6) was also higher in the same patients (287±121 vs. 220±59, P=0.056). However, there were no correlations between the concentrations of sCD44std or sCD44v6 and clinico‐pathological parameters such as grade, stage, histological type, tumor size and growth type. The ratio of sCD44std/sCD44v6 was higher in the rapid growth‐type cancers than in the slow growth‐type cancers (3.95±2.12 vs. 2.63±0.82, P=0.014). These findings suggested that the serum concentration of unknown soluble CD44 isoforms not sharing exon v6, which are present in sCD44std, increases in patients with rapid growth‐type cancers. These findings indicated that sCD44std and sCD44v6 are not useful indicators of tumor burden and metastasis in patients with renal cancer, but that an unknown sCD44 isoform(s) plays a role in the biological behavior of the rapid growth‐type cancers.