Cargando…

Assessment of Preference for Breast Cancer Chemopreyention in Japanese Young Women

Pills containing estrogen and progesterone or gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist have been considered valuable to prevent breast cancer. This study assessed preference for the combination‐type pill for preventing breast cancer, to evaluate the hypothetical preventive effect of this agent among y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Nagata, Chisato
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1997
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5921509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9369925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1997.tb00453.x
_version_ 1783318027706564608
author Nagata, Chisato
author_facet Nagata, Chisato
author_sort Nagata, Chisato
collection PubMed
description Pills containing estrogen and progesterone or gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist have been considered valuable to prevent breast cancer. This study assessed preference for the combination‐type pill for preventing breast cancer, to evaluate the hypothetical preventive effect of this agent among young Japanese women. The standard gamble method was applied. Fifty‐five college students and 44 nursing school students aged between 18 and 41 years were asked to decide the probability of being affected by breast cancer at which they would start to take this agent. Preference score was calculated by subtracting the probability given by each respondent from 1, which corresponds to the value (utility) she allotted to the agent. The means of preference score were 0.58, 0.48, 0.37, and 0.27 for 100, 75, 50, and 25% of efficacy levels of the agent, respectively. Preference score was significantly lower in nursing school students and those whose knowledge about hormones were relatively high. Score of Health Locus of Control (HLC) was nonsignificantly negatively correlated with preference score at any efficacy level. HLC score was significantly higher among those who refused the agent with 50 and 25% efficacy levels at 100% level of breast cancer risk. The data suggest that perceived risk of this agent was not negligibly small in this population and school status, knowledge about hormones, and beliefs about health would affect preference for the agent. Understanding of preference for chemopreventive agents for breast cancer, especially those containing hormones, is important to assess their potential as future preventive agents and is helpful when planning a strategy of chemoprevention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5921509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1997
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59215092018-05-11 Assessment of Preference for Breast Cancer Chemopreyention in Japanese Young Women Nagata, Chisato Jpn J Cancer Res Article Pills containing estrogen and progesterone or gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist have been considered valuable to prevent breast cancer. This study assessed preference for the combination‐type pill for preventing breast cancer, to evaluate the hypothetical preventive effect of this agent among young Japanese women. The standard gamble method was applied. Fifty‐five college students and 44 nursing school students aged between 18 and 41 years were asked to decide the probability of being affected by breast cancer at which they would start to take this agent. Preference score was calculated by subtracting the probability given by each respondent from 1, which corresponds to the value (utility) she allotted to the agent. The means of preference score were 0.58, 0.48, 0.37, and 0.27 for 100, 75, 50, and 25% of efficacy levels of the agent, respectively. Preference score was significantly lower in nursing school students and those whose knowledge about hormones were relatively high. Score of Health Locus of Control (HLC) was nonsignificantly negatively correlated with preference score at any efficacy level. HLC score was significantly higher among those who refused the agent with 50 and 25% efficacy levels at 100% level of breast cancer risk. The data suggest that perceived risk of this agent was not negligibly small in this population and school status, knowledge about hormones, and beliefs about health would affect preference for the agent. Understanding of preference for chemopreventive agents for breast cancer, especially those containing hormones, is important to assess their potential as future preventive agents and is helpful when planning a strategy of chemoprevention. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1997-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5921509/ /pubmed/9369925 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1997.tb00453.x Text en
spellingShingle Article
Nagata, Chisato
Assessment of Preference for Breast Cancer Chemopreyention in Japanese Young Women
title Assessment of Preference for Breast Cancer Chemopreyention in Japanese Young Women
title_full Assessment of Preference for Breast Cancer Chemopreyention in Japanese Young Women
title_fullStr Assessment of Preference for Breast Cancer Chemopreyention in Japanese Young Women
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Preference for Breast Cancer Chemopreyention in Japanese Young Women
title_short Assessment of Preference for Breast Cancer Chemopreyention in Japanese Young Women
title_sort assessment of preference for breast cancer chemopreyention in japanese young women
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5921509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9369925
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1997.tb00453.x
work_keys_str_mv AT nagatachisato assessmentofpreferenceforbreastcancerchemopreyentioninjapaneseyoungwomen