Cargando…

Internal Hernia Following Robotic Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND: Robotic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is reported to be safe and feasible. Internal hernia (IH) after RPD is a serious but rarely reported complication. MATERIAL/METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of 231 patients who underwent RPD from October 2010 to December 2016. The i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Kai, Wu, Zhichong, Jin, Jiabin, Shen, Baiyong, Peng, Chenghong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5921957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29658495
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.909273
_version_ 1783318116053286912
author Qin, Kai
Wu, Zhichong
Jin, Jiabin
Shen, Baiyong
Peng, Chenghong
author_facet Qin, Kai
Wu, Zhichong
Jin, Jiabin
Shen, Baiyong
Peng, Chenghong
author_sort Qin, Kai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Robotic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is reported to be safe and feasible. Internal hernia (IH) after RPD is a serious but rarely reported complication. MATERIAL/METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of 231 patients who underwent RPD from October 2010 to December 2016. The incidence, symptoms, time of presentation, and outcome were investigated. RESULTS: Five patients (2.6%) were diagnosed with IH. Significant correlation (P<0.001) between IH and transverse mesocolon defect was confirmed. In patients without defect closure, the incidence of IH was 62.5%, while patients who received defect closure experienced no IH. The median time between initial surgery and occurrence of IH was 76 days. The main symptoms were abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. All patients received abdominal computed tomography (CT) and were suspected to have IH according to imaging and symptoms. All patients underwent reoperation (2 laparoscopic and 3 open surgery). The median length of hospital stay was 13 days. No patient experienced a relapse after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting were common symptoms in our study patients who underwent RPD. IH should be suspected if there is a positive finding on CT. Timely reoperation is necessary because IH may cause intestinal ischemia. Meticulous closure of the mesenteric defect is vital to avoid IH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5921957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59219572018-04-30 Internal Hernia Following Robotic Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy Qin, Kai Wu, Zhichong Jin, Jiabin Shen, Baiyong Peng, Chenghong Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: Robotic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is reported to be safe and feasible. Internal hernia (IH) after RPD is a serious but rarely reported complication. MATERIAL/METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data of 231 patients who underwent RPD from October 2010 to December 2016. The incidence, symptoms, time of presentation, and outcome were investigated. RESULTS: Five patients (2.6%) were diagnosed with IH. Significant correlation (P<0.001) between IH and transverse mesocolon defect was confirmed. In patients without defect closure, the incidence of IH was 62.5%, while patients who received defect closure experienced no IH. The median time between initial surgery and occurrence of IH was 76 days. The main symptoms were abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. All patients received abdominal computed tomography (CT) and were suspected to have IH according to imaging and symptoms. All patients underwent reoperation (2 laparoscopic and 3 open surgery). The median length of hospital stay was 13 days. No patient experienced a relapse after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting were common symptoms in our study patients who underwent RPD. IH should be suspected if there is a positive finding on CT. Timely reoperation is necessary because IH may cause intestinal ischemia. Meticulous closure of the mesenteric defect is vital to avoid IH. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5921957/ /pubmed/29658495 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.909273 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2018 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Qin, Kai
Wu, Zhichong
Jin, Jiabin
Shen, Baiyong
Peng, Chenghong
Internal Hernia Following Robotic Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
title Internal Hernia Following Robotic Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
title_full Internal Hernia Following Robotic Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
title_fullStr Internal Hernia Following Robotic Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
title_full_unstemmed Internal Hernia Following Robotic Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
title_short Internal Hernia Following Robotic Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy
title_sort internal hernia following robotic assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5921957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29658495
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.909273
work_keys_str_mv AT qinkai internalherniafollowingroboticassistedpancreaticoduodenectomy
AT wuzhichong internalherniafollowingroboticassistedpancreaticoduodenectomy
AT jinjiabin internalherniafollowingroboticassistedpancreaticoduodenectomy
AT shenbaiyong internalherniafollowingroboticassistedpancreaticoduodenectomy
AT pengchenghong internalherniafollowingroboticassistedpancreaticoduodenectomy