Cargando…
Review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility
OBJECTIVES: To present the current state of the art in various robot-assisted microsurgical procedures in male infertility and review the latest literature, as the technology in infertility procedures has substantially developed since the incorporation of the Vinci® robotic platform (Intuitive Surgi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5922003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.006 |
_version_ | 1783318125492568064 |
---|---|
author | Etafy, Mohamed Gudeloglu, Ahmet Brahmbhatt, Jamin V. Parekattil, Sijo J. |
author_facet | Etafy, Mohamed Gudeloglu, Ahmet Brahmbhatt, Jamin V. Parekattil, Sijo J. |
author_sort | Etafy, Mohamed |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To present the current state of the art in various robot-assisted microsurgical procedures in male infertility and review the latest literature, as the technology in infertility procedures has substantially developed since the incorporation of the Vinci® robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search strategy in this review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A search strategy was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed and the Cochrane electronic databases (from 2000 to present) to identify studies that included both robotic and male infertility. RESULTS: In all, 23 studies were found, 12 of which met our inclusion criteria. Articles were excluded if the study did not include both male infertility and robotics. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic assistance for microsurgical procedures in male infertility appears to be safe and feasible. It has several advantages including elimination of tremor, multi-view magnification, additional instrument arms, and enhanced dexterity with articulating instrument arms. It also has a short learning curve with a small skin incision. However, larger, prospective studies are needed to establish the clinical benefits over standard microsurgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5922003 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59220032018-04-30 Review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility Etafy, Mohamed Gudeloglu, Ahmet Brahmbhatt, Jamin V. Parekattil, Sijo J. Arab J Urol Management OBJECTIVES: To present the current state of the art in various robot-assisted microsurgical procedures in male infertility and review the latest literature, as the technology in infertility procedures has substantially developed since the incorporation of the Vinci® robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The search strategy in this review was conducted in accordance with Cochrane guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A search strategy was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed and the Cochrane electronic databases (from 2000 to present) to identify studies that included both robotic and male infertility. RESULTS: In all, 23 studies were found, 12 of which met our inclusion criteria. Articles were excluded if the study did not include both male infertility and robotics. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic assistance for microsurgical procedures in male infertility appears to be safe and feasible. It has several advantages including elimination of tremor, multi-view magnification, additional instrument arms, and enhanced dexterity with articulating instrument arms. It also has a short learning curve with a small skin incision. However, larger, prospective studies are needed to establish the clinical benefits over standard microsurgery. Elsevier 2017-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5922003/ /pubmed/29713546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.006 Text en © 2017 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Arab Association of Urology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Management Etafy, Mohamed Gudeloglu, Ahmet Brahmbhatt, Jamin V. Parekattil, Sijo J. Review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility |
title | Review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility |
title_full | Review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility |
title_fullStr | Review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility |
title_short | Review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility |
title_sort | review of the role of robotic surgery in male infertility |
topic | Management |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5922003/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2017.11.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT etafymohamed reviewoftheroleofroboticsurgeryinmaleinfertility AT gudelogluahmet reviewoftheroleofroboticsurgeryinmaleinfertility AT brahmbhattjaminv reviewoftheroleofroboticsurgeryinmaleinfertility AT parekattilsijoj reviewoftheroleofroboticsurgeryinmaleinfertility |