Cargando…

In vitro quality control analysis after processing and during storage of feline packed red blood cells units

BACKGROUND: During the storage of packed red blood cells (pRBC), packed cell volume (PCV), bacterial contamination and percentage of haemolysis [percentage of free haemoglobin (HGB) in relation to the total HGB] are important quality parameters. Both PCV and haemolysis are indicators of the cellular...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blasi Brugué, C., Ferreira, Rui R. F., Mesa Sanchez, I., Graça, Rita M. C., Cardoso, Inês M., de Matos, Augusto J. F., Ruiz de Gopegui, Rafael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5922008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29699565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1458-4
_version_ 1783318126670118912
author Blasi Brugué, C.
Ferreira, Rui R. F.
Mesa Sanchez, I.
Graça, Rita M. C.
Cardoso, Inês M.
de Matos, Augusto J. F.
Ruiz de Gopegui, Rafael
author_facet Blasi Brugué, C.
Ferreira, Rui R. F.
Mesa Sanchez, I.
Graça, Rita M. C.
Cardoso, Inês M.
de Matos, Augusto J. F.
Ruiz de Gopegui, Rafael
author_sort Blasi Brugué, C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the storage of packed red blood cells (pRBC), packed cell volume (PCV), bacterial contamination and percentage of haemolysis [percentage of free haemoglobin (HGB) in relation to the total HGB] are important quality parameters. Both PCV and haemolysis are indicators of the cellular integrity of stored units. There are no published experimental studies that evaluated these parameters during storage of feline pRBC using SAGM (adenine, dextrose, mannitol and sodium chloride) as the additive solution. The present study aims to (1) evaluate the quality of feline pRBCs stored in SAGM; (2) test for the semi-closed system’s suitability for use and risk of bacterial contamination; (3) establish the maximum storage time that may be appropriate to meet the criteria established by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) guidelines for human blood banking; and (4) evaluate the need to calculate the percentage of haemolysis prior to the administration of units stored for more than 4 weeks. Four hundred eighty nine feline pRBC units were analyzed. Bacterial culture, PCV and percentage of haemolysis were determined within 6 h after processing (t0). One hundred and eighty units were re-tested for haemolysis and PCV after 29–35 days of storage (t1) and 118 units after 36–42 days (t2). RESULTS: Bacterial contamination was not detected in any pRBC unit. Mean PCV at t0 was 52.25% (SD: ±5.27) and decreased significantly (p < 0.001) during storage to 48.15% (SD: ±3.79) at t1 and to 49.34% (SD: ±4.45) at t2. Mean percentage of haemolysis at t0 was 0.07% (SD: ±0.06) and increased significantly (p < 0.001) to 0.69% (SD: ±0.40) at t1 and to 0.81% (SD: ±0.47) at t2. In addition, 13.88% and 19.49% of pRBC units exceeded 1% haemolysis at t1 and t2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to the US-FDA guidelines for human blood banking that recommend a maximum of 1% haemolysis, the results of this study show that all feline pRBC units with less than 24 h of shelf life have low levels of haemolysis. However, units preserved up to 28 days can only be administered if tested for haemolysis before use, since 13.88% units exceeded the 1% limit. The semi-closed system was considered safe for use as bacterial contamination was not detected in any pRBC unit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5922008
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59220082018-05-07 In vitro quality control analysis after processing and during storage of feline packed red blood cells units Blasi Brugué, C. Ferreira, Rui R. F. Mesa Sanchez, I. Graça, Rita M. C. Cardoso, Inês M. de Matos, Augusto J. F. Ruiz de Gopegui, Rafael BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: During the storage of packed red blood cells (pRBC), packed cell volume (PCV), bacterial contamination and percentage of haemolysis [percentage of free haemoglobin (HGB) in relation to the total HGB] are important quality parameters. Both PCV and haemolysis are indicators of the cellular integrity of stored units. There are no published experimental studies that evaluated these parameters during storage of feline pRBC using SAGM (adenine, dextrose, mannitol and sodium chloride) as the additive solution. The present study aims to (1) evaluate the quality of feline pRBCs stored in SAGM; (2) test for the semi-closed system’s suitability for use and risk of bacterial contamination; (3) establish the maximum storage time that may be appropriate to meet the criteria established by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA) guidelines for human blood banking; and (4) evaluate the need to calculate the percentage of haemolysis prior to the administration of units stored for more than 4 weeks. Four hundred eighty nine feline pRBC units were analyzed. Bacterial culture, PCV and percentage of haemolysis were determined within 6 h after processing (t0). One hundred and eighty units were re-tested for haemolysis and PCV after 29–35 days of storage (t1) and 118 units after 36–42 days (t2). RESULTS: Bacterial contamination was not detected in any pRBC unit. Mean PCV at t0 was 52.25% (SD: ±5.27) and decreased significantly (p < 0.001) during storage to 48.15% (SD: ±3.79) at t1 and to 49.34% (SD: ±4.45) at t2. Mean percentage of haemolysis at t0 was 0.07% (SD: ±0.06) and increased significantly (p < 0.001) to 0.69% (SD: ±0.40) at t1 and to 0.81% (SD: ±0.47) at t2. In addition, 13.88% and 19.49% of pRBC units exceeded 1% haemolysis at t1 and t2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to the US-FDA guidelines for human blood banking that recommend a maximum of 1% haemolysis, the results of this study show that all feline pRBC units with less than 24 h of shelf life have low levels of haemolysis. However, units preserved up to 28 days can only be administered if tested for haemolysis before use, since 13.88% units exceeded the 1% limit. The semi-closed system was considered safe for use as bacterial contamination was not detected in any pRBC unit. BioMed Central 2018-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5922008/ /pubmed/29699565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1458-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blasi Brugué, C.
Ferreira, Rui R. F.
Mesa Sanchez, I.
Graça, Rita M. C.
Cardoso, Inês M.
de Matos, Augusto J. F.
Ruiz de Gopegui, Rafael
In vitro quality control analysis after processing and during storage of feline packed red blood cells units
title In vitro quality control analysis after processing and during storage of feline packed red blood cells units
title_full In vitro quality control analysis after processing and during storage of feline packed red blood cells units
title_fullStr In vitro quality control analysis after processing and during storage of feline packed red blood cells units
title_full_unstemmed In vitro quality control analysis after processing and during storage of feline packed red blood cells units
title_short In vitro quality control analysis after processing and during storage of feline packed red blood cells units
title_sort in vitro quality control analysis after processing and during storage of feline packed red blood cells units
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5922008/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29699565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1458-4
work_keys_str_mv AT blasibruguec invitroqualitycontrolanalysisafterprocessingandduringstorageoffelinepackedredbloodcellsunits
AT ferreiraruirf invitroqualitycontrolanalysisafterprocessingandduringstorageoffelinepackedredbloodcellsunits
AT mesasanchezi invitroqualitycontrolanalysisafterprocessingandduringstorageoffelinepackedredbloodcellsunits
AT gracaritamc invitroqualitycontrolanalysisafterprocessingandduringstorageoffelinepackedredbloodcellsunits
AT cardosoinesm invitroqualitycontrolanalysisafterprocessingandduringstorageoffelinepackedredbloodcellsunits
AT dematosaugustojf invitroqualitycontrolanalysisafterprocessingandduringstorageoffelinepackedredbloodcellsunits
AT ruizdegopeguirafael invitroqualitycontrolanalysisafterprocessingandduringstorageoffelinepackedredbloodcellsunits