Cargando…

Global landscape assessment of screening technologies for medicine quality assurance: stakeholder perceptions and practices from ten countries

BACKGROUND: The spread of substandard and falsified (SF) medical products constitutes a growing global public health concern. Some countries use portable, handheld screening technologies (STs) in the field to accelerate detection of SF medicines and reduce the number of medicine samples that undergo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roth, Lukas, Nalim, Ameena, Turesson, Beth, Krech, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5922304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0360-y
_version_ 1783318172037808128
author Roth, Lukas
Nalim, Ameena
Turesson, Beth
Krech, Laura
author_facet Roth, Lukas
Nalim, Ameena
Turesson, Beth
Krech, Laura
author_sort Roth, Lukas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The spread of substandard and falsified (SF) medical products constitutes a growing global public health concern. Some countries use portable, handheld screening technologies (STs) in the field to accelerate detection of SF medicines and reduce the number of medicine samples that undergo costly and time-consuming confirmatory analysis. METHODS: A multi-country, multi-stakeholder landscape assessment utilizing qualitative methodology was used to examine practices and perceptions related to the use of STs. Qualitative interview guides were designed using the results of a literature review and comprised of open-ended questions with the study participants, who were from national medicine regulatory authorities, pharmaceutical manufacturers, pharmacies, and distributors. Ten geographically and economically diverse countries were selected: Argentina, China, Egypt, India, Jordan, Mexico, Nigeria, Philippines, the United States, and Zimbabwe. Of the completed 53 interviews, 32 were in-person, 16 were phone interviews, and 5 were via written questionnaires. RESULTS: Data analysis shows a wide variation in understanding and usage of STs in different sectors. Virtually all of the study participants indicated a lack of objective, accessible information on STs to advise them on what technologies would be beneficial for their needs. Study participants also described their ideal capabilities of the next generation of STs, including shareable spectral libraries, lower acquisition costs, lesser training requirements, and in-country maintenance and technical support. CONCLUSION: The results and recommendations presented in this article can be used to help regulators communicate and justify their needs to acquire and invest in new STs. There is a need for additional standardized, trustworthy and scientifically sound evaluations of STs, and to support regulators to effectively deploy the most promising technologies. ST manufacturers can take into account some of the limitations of the technologies the interviewees identified in this article, such as a dearth of technologies, which provide quantitative information about the active ingredient, and take steps to address them to better serve their customers. These results and recommendations, can catalyze research and actionable interventions into the development, review, application, and use of STs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12992-018-0360-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5922304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59223042018-05-07 Global landscape assessment of screening technologies for medicine quality assurance: stakeholder perceptions and practices from ten countries Roth, Lukas Nalim, Ameena Turesson, Beth Krech, Laura Global Health Research BACKGROUND: The spread of substandard and falsified (SF) medical products constitutes a growing global public health concern. Some countries use portable, handheld screening technologies (STs) in the field to accelerate detection of SF medicines and reduce the number of medicine samples that undergo costly and time-consuming confirmatory analysis. METHODS: A multi-country, multi-stakeholder landscape assessment utilizing qualitative methodology was used to examine practices and perceptions related to the use of STs. Qualitative interview guides were designed using the results of a literature review and comprised of open-ended questions with the study participants, who were from national medicine regulatory authorities, pharmaceutical manufacturers, pharmacies, and distributors. Ten geographically and economically diverse countries were selected: Argentina, China, Egypt, India, Jordan, Mexico, Nigeria, Philippines, the United States, and Zimbabwe. Of the completed 53 interviews, 32 were in-person, 16 were phone interviews, and 5 were via written questionnaires. RESULTS: Data analysis shows a wide variation in understanding and usage of STs in different sectors. Virtually all of the study participants indicated a lack of objective, accessible information on STs to advise them on what technologies would be beneficial for their needs. Study participants also described their ideal capabilities of the next generation of STs, including shareable spectral libraries, lower acquisition costs, lesser training requirements, and in-country maintenance and technical support. CONCLUSION: The results and recommendations presented in this article can be used to help regulators communicate and justify their needs to acquire and invest in new STs. There is a need for additional standardized, trustworthy and scientifically sound evaluations of STs, and to support regulators to effectively deploy the most promising technologies. ST manufacturers can take into account some of the limitations of the technologies the interviewees identified in this article, such as a dearth of technologies, which provide quantitative information about the active ingredient, and take steps to address them to better serve their customers. These results and recommendations, can catalyze research and actionable interventions into the development, review, application, and use of STs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12992-018-0360-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5922304/ /pubmed/29695278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0360-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Roth, Lukas
Nalim, Ameena
Turesson, Beth
Krech, Laura
Global landscape assessment of screening technologies for medicine quality assurance: stakeholder perceptions and practices from ten countries
title Global landscape assessment of screening technologies for medicine quality assurance: stakeholder perceptions and practices from ten countries
title_full Global landscape assessment of screening technologies for medicine quality assurance: stakeholder perceptions and practices from ten countries
title_fullStr Global landscape assessment of screening technologies for medicine quality assurance: stakeholder perceptions and practices from ten countries
title_full_unstemmed Global landscape assessment of screening technologies for medicine quality assurance: stakeholder perceptions and practices from ten countries
title_short Global landscape assessment of screening technologies for medicine quality assurance: stakeholder perceptions and practices from ten countries
title_sort global landscape assessment of screening technologies for medicine quality assurance: stakeholder perceptions and practices from ten countries
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5922304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12992-018-0360-y
work_keys_str_mv AT rothlukas globallandscapeassessmentofscreeningtechnologiesformedicinequalityassurancestakeholderperceptionsandpracticesfromtencountries
AT nalimameena globallandscapeassessmentofscreeningtechnologiesformedicinequalityassurancestakeholderperceptionsandpracticesfromtencountries
AT turessonbeth globallandscapeassessmentofscreeningtechnologiesformedicinequalityassurancestakeholderperceptionsandpracticesfromtencountries
AT krechlaura globallandscapeassessmentofscreeningtechnologiesformedicinequalityassurancestakeholderperceptionsandpracticesfromtencountries