Cargando…

Controlled cohort evaluation of the LiveLighter mass media campaign’s impact on adults’ reported consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the LiveLighter ‘Sugary Drinks’ campaign impact on awareness, knowledge and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption. DESIGN: Cohort study with population surveys undertaken in intervention and comparison states at baseline (n=900 each), with 78% retention at follow-up (inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morley, Belinda C, Niven, Philippa H, Dixon, Helen G, Swanson, Maurice G, McAleese, Alison B, Wakefield, Melanie A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5922472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019574
_version_ 1783318200026398720
author Morley, Belinda C
Niven, Philippa H
Dixon, Helen G
Swanson, Maurice G
McAleese, Alison B
Wakefield, Melanie A
author_facet Morley, Belinda C
Niven, Philippa H
Dixon, Helen G
Swanson, Maurice G
McAleese, Alison B
Wakefield, Melanie A
author_sort Morley, Belinda C
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the LiveLighter ‘Sugary Drinks’ campaign impact on awareness, knowledge and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption. DESIGN: Cohort study with population surveys undertaken in intervention and comparison states at baseline (n=900 each), with 78% retention at follow-up (intervention: n=673; comparison: n=730). Analyses tested interactions by state (intervention, comparison) and time (baseline, follow-up). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 25–49 years residing in the Australian states of Victoria and South Australia. INTERVENTION: The 6-week mass media campaign ran in Victoria in October/November 2015. It focused on the contribution of SSBs to the development of visceral ‘toxic fat’, graphically depicted around vital organs, and ultimately serious disease. Paid television advertising was complemented by radio, cinema, online and social media advertising, and stakeholder and community engagement. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported consumption of SSBs, artificially sweetened drinks and water. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Campaign recall and recognition; knowledge of the health effects of overweight and SSB consumption; perceived impact of SSB consumption on body weight and of reduced consumption on health. RESULTS: A significant reduction in frequent SSB consumption was observed in the intervention state (intervention: 31% compared with 22%, comparison: 30% compared with 29%; interaction p<0.01). This was accompanied by evidence of increased water consumption (intervention: 66% compared with 73%; comparison: 68% compared with 67%; interaction p=0.09) among overweight/obese SSB consumers. This group also showed increased knowledge of the health effects of SSB consumption (intervention: 60% compared with 71%, comparison: 63% compared with 59%; interaction p<0.05) and some evidence of increased prevalence of self-referent thoughts about SSB’s relationship to weight gain (intervention: 39% compared with 45%, comparison: 43% compared with 38%; interaction p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide evidence of reduced SSB consumption among adults in the target age range following the LiveLighter campaign. This is notable in a context where public health campaigns occur against a backdrop of heavy commercial product advertising promoting increased SSB consumption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5922472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59224722018-04-30 Controlled cohort evaluation of the LiveLighter mass media campaign’s impact on adults’ reported consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages Morley, Belinda C Niven, Philippa H Dixon, Helen G Swanson, Maurice G McAleese, Alison B Wakefield, Melanie A BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the LiveLighter ‘Sugary Drinks’ campaign impact on awareness, knowledge and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption. DESIGN: Cohort study with population surveys undertaken in intervention and comparison states at baseline (n=900 each), with 78% retention at follow-up (intervention: n=673; comparison: n=730). Analyses tested interactions by state (intervention, comparison) and time (baseline, follow-up). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 25–49 years residing in the Australian states of Victoria and South Australia. INTERVENTION: The 6-week mass media campaign ran in Victoria in October/November 2015. It focused on the contribution of SSBs to the development of visceral ‘toxic fat’, graphically depicted around vital organs, and ultimately serious disease. Paid television advertising was complemented by radio, cinema, online and social media advertising, and stakeholder and community engagement. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported consumption of SSBs, artificially sweetened drinks and water. SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Campaign recall and recognition; knowledge of the health effects of overweight and SSB consumption; perceived impact of SSB consumption on body weight and of reduced consumption on health. RESULTS: A significant reduction in frequent SSB consumption was observed in the intervention state (intervention: 31% compared with 22%, comparison: 30% compared with 29%; interaction p<0.01). This was accompanied by evidence of increased water consumption (intervention: 66% compared with 73%; comparison: 68% compared with 67%; interaction p=0.09) among overweight/obese SSB consumers. This group also showed increased knowledge of the health effects of SSB consumption (intervention: 60% compared with 71%, comparison: 63% compared with 59%; interaction p<0.05) and some evidence of increased prevalence of self-referent thoughts about SSB’s relationship to weight gain (intervention: 39% compared with 45%, comparison: 43% compared with 38%; interaction p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The findings provide evidence of reduced SSB consumption among adults in the target age range following the LiveLighter campaign. This is notable in a context where public health campaigns occur against a backdrop of heavy commercial product advertising promoting increased SSB consumption. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5922472/ /pubmed/29695387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019574 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Public Health
Morley, Belinda C
Niven, Philippa H
Dixon, Helen G
Swanson, Maurice G
McAleese, Alison B
Wakefield, Melanie A
Controlled cohort evaluation of the LiveLighter mass media campaign’s impact on adults’ reported consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages
title Controlled cohort evaluation of the LiveLighter mass media campaign’s impact on adults’ reported consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages
title_full Controlled cohort evaluation of the LiveLighter mass media campaign’s impact on adults’ reported consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages
title_fullStr Controlled cohort evaluation of the LiveLighter mass media campaign’s impact on adults’ reported consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages
title_full_unstemmed Controlled cohort evaluation of the LiveLighter mass media campaign’s impact on adults’ reported consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages
title_short Controlled cohort evaluation of the LiveLighter mass media campaign’s impact on adults’ reported consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages
title_sort controlled cohort evaluation of the livelighter mass media campaign’s impact on adults’ reported consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5922472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29695387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019574
work_keys_str_mv AT morleybelindac controlledcohortevaluationofthelivelightermassmediacampaignsimpactonadultsreportedconsumptionofsugarsweetenedbeverages
AT nivenphilippah controlledcohortevaluationofthelivelightermassmediacampaignsimpactonadultsreportedconsumptionofsugarsweetenedbeverages
AT dixonheleng controlledcohortevaluationofthelivelightermassmediacampaignsimpactonadultsreportedconsumptionofsugarsweetenedbeverages
AT swansonmauriceg controlledcohortevaluationofthelivelightermassmediacampaignsimpactonadultsreportedconsumptionofsugarsweetenedbeverages
AT mcaleesealisonb controlledcohortevaluationofthelivelightermassmediacampaignsimpactonadultsreportedconsumptionofsugarsweetenedbeverages
AT wakefieldmelaniea controlledcohortevaluationofthelivelightermassmediacampaignsimpactonadultsreportedconsumptionofsugarsweetenedbeverages