Cargando…

Intent-to-treat analysis of a simultaneous multisite telehealth diabetes prevention program

OBJECTIVE: Determine the effectiveness of a 16-week modified diabetes prevention program (DPP) administered simultaneously to multiple rural communities from a single urban site, as compared with a similar face-to-face intervention. A 12-week intervention was evaluated to consider minimization of st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ciemins, Elizabeth L, Coon, Patricia J, Coombs, Nicholas C, Holloway, Barbara L, Mullette, Elizabeth J, Dudley, William N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5922481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000515
_version_ 1783318202109919232
author Ciemins, Elizabeth L
Coon, Patricia J
Coombs, Nicholas C
Holloway, Barbara L
Mullette, Elizabeth J
Dudley, William N
author_facet Ciemins, Elizabeth L
Coon, Patricia J
Coombs, Nicholas C
Holloway, Barbara L
Mullette, Elizabeth J
Dudley, William N
author_sort Ciemins, Elizabeth L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Determine the effectiveness of a 16-week modified diabetes prevention program (DPP) administered simultaneously to multiple rural communities from a single urban site, as compared with a similar face-to-face intervention. A 12-week intervention was evaluated to consider minimization of staff costs in communities where resources are limited. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study compared DPP interventions implemented in rural (via telehealth technology) and urban (face-to-face) communities using an intent-to-treat analysis. Primary outcome measures included 5% and 7% body weight loss. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictors of intervention success and included a variable for treatment effect. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2015, up to 667 participants were enrolled in the study representing one urban and 15 rural communities across Montana. The 16-week urban and rural interventions were comparable; 33.5% and 34.6% of participants lost 7% body weight, respectively; 50% and 47% lost 5% (p=0.22). Participants who were male (OR=2.41; 95% CI 1.32 to 4.40), had lower baseline body mass index (OR=1.03; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07), attended more sessions (OR=1.33; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.58), and more frequently reported (OR=3.84; 95% CI 1.05 to 14.13) and met daily fat gram (OR=4.26; 95% CI 1.7 to 10.6) and weekly activity goals (OR=2.46; 95% CI 1.06 to 5.71) were more likely to meet their 7% weight loss goal. Predictors of meeting weight loss goals were similar for participants enrolled in the 12-week intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Using telehealth technology to administer a modified DPP to multiple rural communities simultaneously demonstrated weight loss results comparable to those in a face-to-face intervention. Given the limitation of resources, linking rural areas to urban centers using telemedicine may increase access to much needed services to prevent or delay progression to diabetes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5922481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59224812018-04-30 Intent-to-treat analysis of a simultaneous multisite telehealth diabetes prevention program Ciemins, Elizabeth L Coon, Patricia J Coombs, Nicholas C Holloway, Barbara L Mullette, Elizabeth J Dudley, William N BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Clinical Care OBJECTIVE: Determine the effectiveness of a 16-week modified diabetes prevention program (DPP) administered simultaneously to multiple rural communities from a single urban site, as compared with a similar face-to-face intervention. A 12-week intervention was evaluated to consider minimization of staff costs in communities where resources are limited. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study compared DPP interventions implemented in rural (via telehealth technology) and urban (face-to-face) communities using an intent-to-treat analysis. Primary outcome measures included 5% and 7% body weight loss. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictors of intervention success and included a variable for treatment effect. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2015, up to 667 participants were enrolled in the study representing one urban and 15 rural communities across Montana. The 16-week urban and rural interventions were comparable; 33.5% and 34.6% of participants lost 7% body weight, respectively; 50% and 47% lost 5% (p=0.22). Participants who were male (OR=2.41; 95% CI 1.32 to 4.40), had lower baseline body mass index (OR=1.03; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.07), attended more sessions (OR=1.33; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.58), and more frequently reported (OR=3.84; 95% CI 1.05 to 14.13) and met daily fat gram (OR=4.26; 95% CI 1.7 to 10.6) and weekly activity goals (OR=2.46; 95% CI 1.06 to 5.71) were more likely to meet their 7% weight loss goal. Predictors of meeting weight loss goals were similar for participants enrolled in the 12-week intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Using telehealth technology to administer a modified DPP to multiple rural communities simultaneously demonstrated weight loss results comparable to those in a face-to-face intervention. Given the limitation of resources, linking rural areas to urban centers using telemedicine may increase access to much needed services to prevent or delay progression to diabetes. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5922481/ /pubmed/29713481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000515 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Clinical Care
Ciemins, Elizabeth L
Coon, Patricia J
Coombs, Nicholas C
Holloway, Barbara L
Mullette, Elizabeth J
Dudley, William N
Intent-to-treat analysis of a simultaneous multisite telehealth diabetes prevention program
title Intent-to-treat analysis of a simultaneous multisite telehealth diabetes prevention program
title_full Intent-to-treat analysis of a simultaneous multisite telehealth diabetes prevention program
title_fullStr Intent-to-treat analysis of a simultaneous multisite telehealth diabetes prevention program
title_full_unstemmed Intent-to-treat analysis of a simultaneous multisite telehealth diabetes prevention program
title_short Intent-to-treat analysis of a simultaneous multisite telehealth diabetes prevention program
title_sort intent-to-treat analysis of a simultaneous multisite telehealth diabetes prevention program
topic Clinical Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5922481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2018-000515
work_keys_str_mv AT cieminselizabethl intenttotreatanalysisofasimultaneousmultisitetelehealthdiabetespreventionprogram
AT coonpatriciaj intenttotreatanalysisofasimultaneousmultisitetelehealthdiabetespreventionprogram
AT coombsnicholasc intenttotreatanalysisofasimultaneousmultisitetelehealthdiabetespreventionprogram
AT hollowaybarbaral intenttotreatanalysisofasimultaneousmultisitetelehealthdiabetespreventionprogram
AT mulletteelizabethj intenttotreatanalysisofasimultaneousmultisitetelehealthdiabetespreventionprogram
AT dudleywilliamn intenttotreatanalysisofasimultaneousmultisitetelehealthdiabetespreventionprogram