Cargando…

Comparison of exercise intensity during four early rehabilitation techniques in sedated and ventilated patients in ICU: a randomised cross-over trial

BACKGROUND: In the ICU, out-of-bed rehabilitation is often delayed and in-bed exercises are generally low-intensity. Since the majority of rehabilitation is carried out in bed, it is essential to carry out the exercises that have the highest intensity. The aim of this study was to compare the physio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medrinal, Clément, Combret, Yann, Prieur, Guillaume, Robledo Quesada, Aurora, Bonnevie, Tristan, Gravier, Francis Edouard, Dupuis Lozeron, Elise, Frenoy, Eric, Contal, Olivier, Lamia, Bouchra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29703223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2030-0
_version_ 1783318269917134848
author Medrinal, Clément
Combret, Yann
Prieur, Guillaume
Robledo Quesada, Aurora
Bonnevie, Tristan
Gravier, Francis Edouard
Dupuis Lozeron, Elise
Frenoy, Eric
Contal, Olivier
Lamia, Bouchra
author_facet Medrinal, Clément
Combret, Yann
Prieur, Guillaume
Robledo Quesada, Aurora
Bonnevie, Tristan
Gravier, Francis Edouard
Dupuis Lozeron, Elise
Frenoy, Eric
Contal, Olivier
Lamia, Bouchra
author_sort Medrinal, Clément
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the ICU, out-of-bed rehabilitation is often delayed and in-bed exercises are generally low-intensity. Since the majority of rehabilitation is carried out in bed, it is essential to carry out the exercises that have the highest intensity. The aim of this study was to compare the physiological effects of four common types of bed exercise in intubated, sedated patients confined to bed in the ICU, in order to determine which was the most intensive. METHODS: A randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial was carried out to evaluate the effects of four bed exercises (passive range of movements (PROM), passive cycle-ergometry, quadriceps electrical stimulation and functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling) on cardiac output. Each exercise was carried out for ten minutes in ventilated, sedated patients. Cardiac output was recorded using cardiac Doppler ultrasound. The secondary aims were to evaluate right heart function and pulmonary and systemic artery pressures during the exercises, and the microcirculation of the vastus lateralis muscle. RESULTS: The results were analysed in 19 patients. FES cycling was the only exercise that increased cardiac output, with a mean increase of 1 L/min (15%). There was a concomitant increase in muscle oxygen uptake, suggesting that muscle work occurred. FES cycling thus constitutes an effective early rehabilitation intervention. No muscle or systemic effects were induced by the passive techniques. CONCLUSION: Most bed exercises were low-intensity and induced low levels of muscle work. FES cycling was the only exercise that increased cardiac output and produced sufficient intensity of muscle work. Longer-term studies of the effect of FES cycling on functional outcomes should be carried out. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02920684. Registered on 30 September 2016. Prospectively registered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5923017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59230172018-05-07 Comparison of exercise intensity during four early rehabilitation techniques in sedated and ventilated patients in ICU: a randomised cross-over trial Medrinal, Clément Combret, Yann Prieur, Guillaume Robledo Quesada, Aurora Bonnevie, Tristan Gravier, Francis Edouard Dupuis Lozeron, Elise Frenoy, Eric Contal, Olivier Lamia, Bouchra Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: In the ICU, out-of-bed rehabilitation is often delayed and in-bed exercises are generally low-intensity. Since the majority of rehabilitation is carried out in bed, it is essential to carry out the exercises that have the highest intensity. The aim of this study was to compare the physiological effects of four common types of bed exercise in intubated, sedated patients confined to bed in the ICU, in order to determine which was the most intensive. METHODS: A randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial was carried out to evaluate the effects of four bed exercises (passive range of movements (PROM), passive cycle-ergometry, quadriceps electrical stimulation and functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling) on cardiac output. Each exercise was carried out for ten minutes in ventilated, sedated patients. Cardiac output was recorded using cardiac Doppler ultrasound. The secondary aims were to evaluate right heart function and pulmonary and systemic artery pressures during the exercises, and the microcirculation of the vastus lateralis muscle. RESULTS: The results were analysed in 19 patients. FES cycling was the only exercise that increased cardiac output, with a mean increase of 1 L/min (15%). There was a concomitant increase in muscle oxygen uptake, suggesting that muscle work occurred. FES cycling thus constitutes an effective early rehabilitation intervention. No muscle or systemic effects were induced by the passive techniques. CONCLUSION: Most bed exercises were low-intensity and induced low levels of muscle work. FES cycling was the only exercise that increased cardiac output and produced sufficient intensity of muscle work. Longer-term studies of the effect of FES cycling on functional outcomes should be carried out. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02920684. Registered on 30 September 2016. Prospectively registered. BioMed Central 2018-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5923017/ /pubmed/29703223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2030-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Medrinal, Clément
Combret, Yann
Prieur, Guillaume
Robledo Quesada, Aurora
Bonnevie, Tristan
Gravier, Francis Edouard
Dupuis Lozeron, Elise
Frenoy, Eric
Contal, Olivier
Lamia, Bouchra
Comparison of exercise intensity during four early rehabilitation techniques in sedated and ventilated patients in ICU: a randomised cross-over trial
title Comparison of exercise intensity during four early rehabilitation techniques in sedated and ventilated patients in ICU: a randomised cross-over trial
title_full Comparison of exercise intensity during four early rehabilitation techniques in sedated and ventilated patients in ICU: a randomised cross-over trial
title_fullStr Comparison of exercise intensity during four early rehabilitation techniques in sedated and ventilated patients in ICU: a randomised cross-over trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of exercise intensity during four early rehabilitation techniques in sedated and ventilated patients in ICU: a randomised cross-over trial
title_short Comparison of exercise intensity during four early rehabilitation techniques in sedated and ventilated patients in ICU: a randomised cross-over trial
title_sort comparison of exercise intensity during four early rehabilitation techniques in sedated and ventilated patients in icu: a randomised cross-over trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29703223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2030-0
work_keys_str_mv AT medrinalclement comparisonofexerciseintensityduringfourearlyrehabilitationtechniquesinsedatedandventilatedpatientsinicuarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT combretyann comparisonofexerciseintensityduringfourearlyrehabilitationtechniquesinsedatedandventilatedpatientsinicuarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT prieurguillaume comparisonofexerciseintensityduringfourearlyrehabilitationtechniquesinsedatedandventilatedpatientsinicuarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT robledoquesadaaurora comparisonofexerciseintensityduringfourearlyrehabilitationtechniquesinsedatedandventilatedpatientsinicuarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT bonnevietristan comparisonofexerciseintensityduringfourearlyrehabilitationtechniquesinsedatedandventilatedpatientsinicuarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT gravierfrancisedouard comparisonofexerciseintensityduringfourearlyrehabilitationtechniquesinsedatedandventilatedpatientsinicuarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT dupuislozeronelise comparisonofexerciseintensityduringfourearlyrehabilitationtechniquesinsedatedandventilatedpatientsinicuarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT frenoyeric comparisonofexerciseintensityduringfourearlyrehabilitationtechniquesinsedatedandventilatedpatientsinicuarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT contalolivier comparisonofexerciseintensityduringfourearlyrehabilitationtechniquesinsedatedandventilatedpatientsinicuarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT lamiabouchra comparisonofexerciseintensityduringfourearlyrehabilitationtechniquesinsedatedandventilatedpatientsinicuarandomisedcrossovertrial