Cargando…
Validation of the SNACOR clinical scoring system after transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolisation is the standard of care for intermediate stage (BCLC B) hepatocellular carcinoma, but it is challenging to decide when to repeat or stop treatment. Here we performed the first external validation of the SNACOR (tumour Size and Number, baseline Alpha-fetopr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29703174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4407-5 |
_version_ | 1783318283071520768 |
---|---|
author | Mähringer-Kunz, Aline Weinmann, Arndt Schmidtmann, Irene Koch, Sandra Schotten, Sebastian Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Pitton, Michael Bernhard Dueber, Christoph Galle, Peter Robert Kloeckner, Roman |
author_facet | Mähringer-Kunz, Aline Weinmann, Arndt Schmidtmann, Irene Koch, Sandra Schotten, Sebastian Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Pitton, Michael Bernhard Dueber, Christoph Galle, Peter Robert Kloeckner, Roman |
author_sort | Mähringer-Kunz, Aline |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolisation is the standard of care for intermediate stage (BCLC B) hepatocellular carcinoma, but it is challenging to decide when to repeat or stop treatment. Here we performed the first external validation of the SNACOR (tumour Size and Number, baseline Alpha-fetoprotein, Child-Pugh and Objective radiological Response) risk prediction model. METHODS: A total of 1030 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent transarterial chemoembolisation at our tertiary referral centre from January 2000 to December 2016. We determined the following variables that were needed to calculate the SNACOR at baseline: tumour size and number, alpha-fetoprotein level, Child-Pugh class, and objective radiological response after the first transarterial chemoembolisation. Overall survival, time-dependent area under receiver-operating characteristic curves, Harrell’s C-index, and the integrated Brier score were calculated to assess predictive ability. Finally, multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of survival. RESULTS: The study included 268 patients. Low, intermediate, and high SNACOR scores predicted a median survival of 31.5, 19.9, and 9.2 months, respectively. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for overall survival were 0.641, 0.633, and 0.609 at 1, 3, and 6 years, respectively. Harrell’s C-index was 0.59, and the integrated Brier Score was 0.175. Independent predictors of survival included tumour size (P < 0.001), baseline alpha-fetoprotein level (P < 0.001) and Child-Pugh class (P < 0.004). Objective radiological response (P = 0.821) and tumour number (P = 0.127) were not additional independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: The SNACOR risk prediction model can be used to identify patients with a dismal prognosis after the first transarterial chemoembolisation who are unlikely to benefit from further transarterial chemoembolisation. However, Harrell’s C-index showed only moderate performance. Accordingly, this risk prediction model can only serve as one of several components used to make the decision about whether to repeat treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5923193 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59231932018-05-01 Validation of the SNACOR clinical scoring system after transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma Mähringer-Kunz, Aline Weinmann, Arndt Schmidtmann, Irene Koch, Sandra Schotten, Sebastian Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Pitton, Michael Bernhard Dueber, Christoph Galle, Peter Robert Kloeckner, Roman BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Transarterial chemoembolisation is the standard of care for intermediate stage (BCLC B) hepatocellular carcinoma, but it is challenging to decide when to repeat or stop treatment. Here we performed the first external validation of the SNACOR (tumour Size and Number, baseline Alpha-fetoprotein, Child-Pugh and Objective radiological Response) risk prediction model. METHODS: A total of 1030 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent transarterial chemoembolisation at our tertiary referral centre from January 2000 to December 2016. We determined the following variables that were needed to calculate the SNACOR at baseline: tumour size and number, alpha-fetoprotein level, Child-Pugh class, and objective radiological response after the first transarterial chemoembolisation. Overall survival, time-dependent area under receiver-operating characteristic curves, Harrell’s C-index, and the integrated Brier score were calculated to assess predictive ability. Finally, multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of survival. RESULTS: The study included 268 patients. Low, intermediate, and high SNACOR scores predicted a median survival of 31.5, 19.9, and 9.2 months, respectively. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for overall survival were 0.641, 0.633, and 0.609 at 1, 3, and 6 years, respectively. Harrell’s C-index was 0.59, and the integrated Brier Score was 0.175. Independent predictors of survival included tumour size (P < 0.001), baseline alpha-fetoprotein level (P < 0.001) and Child-Pugh class (P < 0.004). Objective radiological response (P = 0.821) and tumour number (P = 0.127) were not additional independent predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: The SNACOR risk prediction model can be used to identify patients with a dismal prognosis after the first transarterial chemoembolisation who are unlikely to benefit from further transarterial chemoembolisation. However, Harrell’s C-index showed only moderate performance. Accordingly, this risk prediction model can only serve as one of several components used to make the decision about whether to repeat treatment. BioMed Central 2018-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5923193/ /pubmed/29703174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4407-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mähringer-Kunz, Aline Weinmann, Arndt Schmidtmann, Irene Koch, Sandra Schotten, Sebastian Pinto dos Santos, Daniel Pitton, Michael Bernhard Dueber, Christoph Galle, Peter Robert Kloeckner, Roman Validation of the SNACOR clinical scoring system after transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma |
title | Validation of the SNACOR clinical scoring system after transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_full | Validation of the SNACOR clinical scoring system after transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Validation of the SNACOR clinical scoring system after transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the SNACOR clinical scoring system after transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_short | Validation of the SNACOR clinical scoring system after transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_sort | validation of the snacor clinical scoring system after transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923193/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29703174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4407-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mahringerkunzaline validationofthesnacorclinicalscoringsystemaftertransarterialchemoembolisationinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma AT weinmannarndt validationofthesnacorclinicalscoringsystemaftertransarterialchemoembolisationinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma AT schmidtmannirene validationofthesnacorclinicalscoringsystemaftertransarterialchemoembolisationinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma AT kochsandra validationofthesnacorclinicalscoringsystemaftertransarterialchemoembolisationinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma AT schottensebastian validationofthesnacorclinicalscoringsystemaftertransarterialchemoembolisationinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma AT pintodossantosdaniel validationofthesnacorclinicalscoringsystemaftertransarterialchemoembolisationinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma AT pittonmichaelbernhard validationofthesnacorclinicalscoringsystemaftertransarterialchemoembolisationinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma AT dueberchristoph validationofthesnacorclinicalscoringsystemaftertransarterialchemoembolisationinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma AT gallepeterrobert validationofthesnacorclinicalscoringsystemaftertransarterialchemoembolisationinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma AT kloecknerroman validationofthesnacorclinicalscoringsystemaftertransarterialchemoembolisationinpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma |