Cargando…
Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial
Propofol sedation has been applied during esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedures, but whether topical pharyngeal anesthesia should be administered at the same time has rarely been reported. Our study examined the role of topical pharyngeal anesthesia in sedated endoscopies in a randomized controlled...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29703990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25164-7 |
_version_ | 1783318301908140032 |
---|---|
author | Sun, Xiaotian Xu, Yang Zhang, Xueting Li, Aitong Zhang, Hanqing Yang, Teng Liu, Yan |
author_facet | Sun, Xiaotian Xu, Yang Zhang, Xueting Li, Aitong Zhang, Hanqing Yang, Teng Liu, Yan |
author_sort | Sun, Xiaotian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Propofol sedation has been applied during esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedures, but whether topical pharyngeal anesthesia should be administered at the same time has rarely been reported. Our study examined the role of topical pharyngeal anesthesia in sedated endoscopies in a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial. A total of 626 patients who underwent sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy were randomized into the experimental group (n = 313) or the control group (n = 313). The discomfort score, immediately and one day after the procedure, was not statistically significant [7.2 (5–9) vs. 7.5 (6–9), P = 0.210; 2.3 (0–3) vs. 2.6 (0–4), P = 0.095, respectively]. Two patients in the experimental group and three patients in the control group needed oral medication for pharyngeal discomfort (P = 0.354). The satisfaction score was 9.2 (8–10) in the experimental group and 8.9 (7–10) in the control group (P = 0.778). Lidocaine topical pharyngeal anesthesia in propofol-sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy did not further reduce the pharyngeal discomfort or improve the satisfaction. This clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03070379). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5923272 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59232722018-05-01 Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial Sun, Xiaotian Xu, Yang Zhang, Xueting Li, Aitong Zhang, Hanqing Yang, Teng Liu, Yan Sci Rep Article Propofol sedation has been applied during esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedures, but whether topical pharyngeal anesthesia should be administered at the same time has rarely been reported. Our study examined the role of topical pharyngeal anesthesia in sedated endoscopies in a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial. A total of 626 patients who underwent sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy were randomized into the experimental group (n = 313) or the control group (n = 313). The discomfort score, immediately and one day after the procedure, was not statistically significant [7.2 (5–9) vs. 7.5 (6–9), P = 0.210; 2.3 (0–3) vs. 2.6 (0–4), P = 0.095, respectively]. Two patients in the experimental group and three patients in the control group needed oral medication for pharyngeal discomfort (P = 0.354). The satisfaction score was 9.2 (8–10) in the experimental group and 8.9 (7–10) in the control group (P = 0.778). Lidocaine topical pharyngeal anesthesia in propofol-sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy did not further reduce the pharyngeal discomfort or improve the satisfaction. This clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03070379). Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5923272/ /pubmed/29703990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25164-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Sun, Xiaotian Xu, Yang Zhang, Xueting Li, Aitong Zhang, Hanqing Yang, Teng Liu, Yan Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial |
title | Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial |
title_full | Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial |
title_short | Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial |
title_sort | topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29703990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25164-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunxiaotian topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial AT xuyang topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial AT zhangxueting topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial AT liaitong topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial AT zhanghanqing topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial AT yangteng topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial AT liuyan topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial |