Cargando…

Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial

Propofol sedation has been applied during esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedures, but whether topical pharyngeal anesthesia should be administered at the same time has rarely been reported. Our study examined the role of topical pharyngeal anesthesia in sedated endoscopies in a randomized controlled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Xiaotian, Xu, Yang, Zhang, Xueting, Li, Aitong, Zhang, Hanqing, Yang, Teng, Liu, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29703990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25164-7
_version_ 1783318301908140032
author Sun, Xiaotian
Xu, Yang
Zhang, Xueting
Li, Aitong
Zhang, Hanqing
Yang, Teng
Liu, Yan
author_facet Sun, Xiaotian
Xu, Yang
Zhang, Xueting
Li, Aitong
Zhang, Hanqing
Yang, Teng
Liu, Yan
author_sort Sun, Xiaotian
collection PubMed
description Propofol sedation has been applied during esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedures, but whether topical pharyngeal anesthesia should be administered at the same time has rarely been reported. Our study examined the role of topical pharyngeal anesthesia in sedated endoscopies in a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial. A total of 626 patients who underwent sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy were randomized into the experimental group (n = 313) or the control group (n = 313). The discomfort score, immediately and one day after the procedure, was not statistically significant [7.2 (5–9) vs. 7.5 (6–9), P = 0.210; 2.3 (0–3) vs. 2.6 (0–4), P = 0.095, respectively]. Two patients in the experimental group and three patients in the control group needed oral medication for pharyngeal discomfort (P = 0.354). The satisfaction score was 9.2 (8–10) in the experimental group and 8.9 (7–10) in the control group (P = 0.778). Lidocaine topical pharyngeal anesthesia in propofol-sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy did not further reduce the pharyngeal discomfort or improve the satisfaction. This clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03070379).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5923272
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59232722018-05-01 Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial Sun, Xiaotian Xu, Yang Zhang, Xueting Li, Aitong Zhang, Hanqing Yang, Teng Liu, Yan Sci Rep Article Propofol sedation has been applied during esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedures, but whether topical pharyngeal anesthesia should be administered at the same time has rarely been reported. Our study examined the role of topical pharyngeal anesthesia in sedated endoscopies in a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial. A total of 626 patients who underwent sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy were randomized into the experimental group (n = 313) or the control group (n = 313). The discomfort score, immediately and one day after the procedure, was not statistically significant [7.2 (5–9) vs. 7.5 (6–9), P = 0.210; 2.3 (0–3) vs. 2.6 (0–4), P = 0.095, respectively]. Two patients in the experimental group and three patients in the control group needed oral medication for pharyngeal discomfort (P = 0.354). The satisfaction score was 9.2 (8–10) in the experimental group and 8.9 (7–10) in the control group (P = 0.778). Lidocaine topical pharyngeal anesthesia in propofol-sedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy did not further reduce the pharyngeal discomfort or improve the satisfaction. This clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03070379). Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC5923272/ /pubmed/29703990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25164-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Sun, Xiaotian
Xu, Yang
Zhang, Xueting
Li, Aitong
Zhang, Hanqing
Yang, Teng
Liu, Yan
Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial
title Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial
title_full Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial
title_fullStr Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial
title_short Topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial
title_sort topical pharyngeal anesthesia provides no additional benefit to propofol sedation for esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized controlled double-blinded clinical trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923272/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29703990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25164-7
work_keys_str_mv AT sunxiaotian topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT xuyang topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT zhangxueting topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT liaitong topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT zhanghanqing topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT yangteng topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial
AT liuyan topicalpharyngealanesthesiaprovidesnoadditionalbenefittopropofolsedationforesophagogastroduodenoscopyarandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindedclinicaltrial