Cargando…

Oncolytic Virotherapy versus Cancer Stem Cells: A Review of Approaches and Mechanisms

A growing body of evidence suggests that a subset of cells within tumors are resistant to conventional treatment modalities and may be responsible for disease recurrence. These cells are called cancer stem cells (CSC), which share properties with normal stem cells including self-renewal, pluripotenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaurasiya, Shyambabu, Chen, Nanhai G., Warner, Susanne G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29671772
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers10040124
_version_ 1783318328674091008
author Chaurasiya, Shyambabu
Chen, Nanhai G.
Warner, Susanne G.
author_facet Chaurasiya, Shyambabu
Chen, Nanhai G.
Warner, Susanne G.
author_sort Chaurasiya, Shyambabu
collection PubMed
description A growing body of evidence suggests that a subset of cells within tumors are resistant to conventional treatment modalities and may be responsible for disease recurrence. These cells are called cancer stem cells (CSC), which share properties with normal stem cells including self-renewal, pluripotency, drug resistance, and the ability to maintain quiescence. While most conventional therapies can efficiently destroy rapidly dividing cancer cells comprising the bulk of a tumor, they often fail to kill the less abundant and quiescent CSCs. Furthermore, killing of only differentiated cells in the tumor may actually allow for enrichment of CSCs and thereby portend a bad prognosis. Therefore, targeting of CSCs is important to achieve long-term success in cancer therapy. Oncolytic viruses represent a completely different class of therapeutics that can kill cancer cells in a variety of ways, which differ from those of conventional therapies. Hence, CSCs that are inherently resistant to conventional therapies may be susceptible to oncolytic virus-mediated killing. Recent studies have shown that oncolytic viruses can efficiently kill CSCs in many types of cancer. Here, we discuss the mechanism through which CSCs can escape conventional therapies and how they may still be susceptible to different classes of oncolytic viruses. Furthermore, we provide a summary of recent studies that have tested oncolytic viruses on CSCs of different origins and discuss possible future directions for this fascinating subset of oncolytic virus research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5923379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59233792018-05-03 Oncolytic Virotherapy versus Cancer Stem Cells: A Review of Approaches and Mechanisms Chaurasiya, Shyambabu Chen, Nanhai G. Warner, Susanne G. Cancers (Basel) Review A growing body of evidence suggests that a subset of cells within tumors are resistant to conventional treatment modalities and may be responsible for disease recurrence. These cells are called cancer stem cells (CSC), which share properties with normal stem cells including self-renewal, pluripotency, drug resistance, and the ability to maintain quiescence. While most conventional therapies can efficiently destroy rapidly dividing cancer cells comprising the bulk of a tumor, they often fail to kill the less abundant and quiescent CSCs. Furthermore, killing of only differentiated cells in the tumor may actually allow for enrichment of CSCs and thereby portend a bad prognosis. Therefore, targeting of CSCs is important to achieve long-term success in cancer therapy. Oncolytic viruses represent a completely different class of therapeutics that can kill cancer cells in a variety of ways, which differ from those of conventional therapies. Hence, CSCs that are inherently resistant to conventional therapies may be susceptible to oncolytic virus-mediated killing. Recent studies have shown that oncolytic viruses can efficiently kill CSCs in many types of cancer. Here, we discuss the mechanism through which CSCs can escape conventional therapies and how they may still be susceptible to different classes of oncolytic viruses. Furthermore, we provide a summary of recent studies that have tested oncolytic viruses on CSCs of different origins and discuss possible future directions for this fascinating subset of oncolytic virus research. MDPI 2018-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5923379/ /pubmed/29671772 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers10040124 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Chaurasiya, Shyambabu
Chen, Nanhai G.
Warner, Susanne G.
Oncolytic Virotherapy versus Cancer Stem Cells: A Review of Approaches and Mechanisms
title Oncolytic Virotherapy versus Cancer Stem Cells: A Review of Approaches and Mechanisms
title_full Oncolytic Virotherapy versus Cancer Stem Cells: A Review of Approaches and Mechanisms
title_fullStr Oncolytic Virotherapy versus Cancer Stem Cells: A Review of Approaches and Mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Oncolytic Virotherapy versus Cancer Stem Cells: A Review of Approaches and Mechanisms
title_short Oncolytic Virotherapy versus Cancer Stem Cells: A Review of Approaches and Mechanisms
title_sort oncolytic virotherapy versus cancer stem cells: a review of approaches and mechanisms
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29671772
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers10040124
work_keys_str_mv AT chaurasiyashyambabu oncolyticvirotherapyversuscancerstemcellsareviewofapproachesandmechanisms
AT chennanhaig oncolyticvirotherapyversuscancerstemcellsareviewofapproachesandmechanisms
AT warnersusanneg oncolyticvirotherapyversuscancerstemcellsareviewofapproachesandmechanisms