Cargando…

Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data

Censoring occurs when complete follow-up time information is unavailable for patients enrolled in a clinical study. The process is considered to be informative (non-ignorable) if the likelihood function for the model cannot be partitioned into a set of response parameters that are independent of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Efird, Jimmy T., Jindal, Charulata
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621186
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040690
_version_ 1783318411406737408
author Efird, Jimmy T.
Jindal, Charulata
author_facet Efird, Jimmy T.
Jindal, Charulata
author_sort Efird, Jimmy T.
collection PubMed
description Censoring occurs when complete follow-up time information is unavailable for patients enrolled in a clinical study. The process is considered to be informative (non-ignorable) if the likelihood function for the model cannot be partitioned into a set of response parameters that are independent of the censoring parameters. In such cases, estimated survival time probabilities may be biased, prompting the need for special statistical methods to remedy the situation. The problem is especially salient when censoring occurs early in a study. In this paper, we describe a method to impute censored follow-up times using a counting process method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5923732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59237322018-05-03 Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data Efird, Jimmy T. Jindal, Charulata Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Censoring occurs when complete follow-up time information is unavailable for patients enrolled in a clinical study. The process is considered to be informative (non-ignorable) if the likelihood function for the model cannot be partitioned into a set of response parameters that are independent of the censoring parameters. In such cases, estimated survival time probabilities may be biased, prompting the need for special statistical methods to remedy the situation. The problem is especially salient when censoring occurs early in a study. In this paper, we describe a method to impute censored follow-up times using a counting process method. MDPI 2018-04-05 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5923732/ /pubmed/29621186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040690 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Efird, Jimmy T.
Jindal, Charulata
Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data
title Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data
title_full Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data
title_fullStr Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data
title_full_unstemmed Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data
title_short Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data
title_sort using a counting process method to impute censored follow-up time data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621186
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040690
work_keys_str_mv AT efirdjimmyt usingacountingprocessmethodtoimputecensoredfollowuptimedata
AT jindalcharulata usingacountingprocessmethodtoimputecensoredfollowuptimedata