Cargando…
Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data
Censoring occurs when complete follow-up time information is unavailable for patients enrolled in a clinical study. The process is considered to be informative (non-ignorable) if the likelihood function for the model cannot be partitioned into a set of response parameters that are independent of the...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040690 |
_version_ | 1783318411406737408 |
---|---|
author | Efird, Jimmy T. Jindal, Charulata |
author_facet | Efird, Jimmy T. Jindal, Charulata |
author_sort | Efird, Jimmy T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Censoring occurs when complete follow-up time information is unavailable for patients enrolled in a clinical study. The process is considered to be informative (non-ignorable) if the likelihood function for the model cannot be partitioned into a set of response parameters that are independent of the censoring parameters. In such cases, estimated survival time probabilities may be biased, prompting the need for special statistical methods to remedy the situation. The problem is especially salient when censoring occurs early in a study. In this paper, we describe a method to impute censored follow-up times using a counting process method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5923732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59237322018-05-03 Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data Efird, Jimmy T. Jindal, Charulata Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Censoring occurs when complete follow-up time information is unavailable for patients enrolled in a clinical study. The process is considered to be informative (non-ignorable) if the likelihood function for the model cannot be partitioned into a set of response parameters that are independent of the censoring parameters. In such cases, estimated survival time probabilities may be biased, prompting the need for special statistical methods to remedy the situation. The problem is especially salient when censoring occurs early in a study. In this paper, we describe a method to impute censored follow-up times using a counting process method. MDPI 2018-04-05 2018-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5923732/ /pubmed/29621186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040690 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Efird, Jimmy T. Jindal, Charulata Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data |
title | Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data |
title_full | Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data |
title_fullStr | Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data |
title_short | Using a Counting Process Method to Impute Censored Follow-Up Time Data |
title_sort | using a counting process method to impute censored follow-up time data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5923732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29621186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040690 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT efirdjimmyt usingacountingprocessmethodtoimputecensoredfollowuptimedata AT jindalcharulata usingacountingprocessmethodtoimputecensoredfollowuptimedata |