Cargando…

Brain–Computer Interface Spellers: A Review

A Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) provides a novel non-muscular communication method via brain signals. A BCI-speller can be considered as one of the first published BCI applications and has opened the gate for many advances in the field. Although many BCI-spellers have been developed during the last...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rezeika, Aya, Benda, Mihaly, Stawicki, Piotr, Gembler, Felix, Saboor, Abdul, Volosyak, Ivan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5924393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29601538
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8040057
_version_ 1783318548853030912
author Rezeika, Aya
Benda, Mihaly
Stawicki, Piotr
Gembler, Felix
Saboor, Abdul
Volosyak, Ivan
author_facet Rezeika, Aya
Benda, Mihaly
Stawicki, Piotr
Gembler, Felix
Saboor, Abdul
Volosyak, Ivan
author_sort Rezeika, Aya
collection PubMed
description A Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) provides a novel non-muscular communication method via brain signals. A BCI-speller can be considered as one of the first published BCI applications and has opened the gate for many advances in the field. Although many BCI-spellers have been developed during the last few decades, to our knowledge, no reviews have described the different spellers proposed and studied in this vital field. The presented speller systems are categorized according to major BCI paradigms: P300, steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), and motor imagery (MI). Different BCI paradigms require specific electroencephalogram (EEG) signal features and lead to the development of appropriate Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs). The purpose of this review is to consolidate the most successful BCI-spellers published since 2010, while mentioning some other older systems which were built explicitly for spelling purposes. We aim to assist researchers and concerned individuals in the field by illustrating the highlights of different spellers and presenting them in one review. It is almost impossible to carry out an objective comparison between different spellers, as each has its variables, parameters, and conditions. However, the gathered information and the provided taxonomy about different BCI-spellers can be helpful, as it could identify suitable systems for first-hand users, as well as opportunities of development and learning from previous studies for BCI researchers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5924393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59243932018-05-03 Brain–Computer Interface Spellers: A Review Rezeika, Aya Benda, Mihaly Stawicki, Piotr Gembler, Felix Saboor, Abdul Volosyak, Ivan Brain Sci Review A Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) provides a novel non-muscular communication method via brain signals. A BCI-speller can be considered as one of the first published BCI applications and has opened the gate for many advances in the field. Although many BCI-spellers have been developed during the last few decades, to our knowledge, no reviews have described the different spellers proposed and studied in this vital field. The presented speller systems are categorized according to major BCI paradigms: P300, steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), and motor imagery (MI). Different BCI paradigms require specific electroencephalogram (EEG) signal features and lead to the development of appropriate Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs). The purpose of this review is to consolidate the most successful BCI-spellers published since 2010, while mentioning some other older systems which were built explicitly for spelling purposes. We aim to assist researchers and concerned individuals in the field by illustrating the highlights of different spellers and presenting them in one review. It is almost impossible to carry out an objective comparison between different spellers, as each has its variables, parameters, and conditions. However, the gathered information and the provided taxonomy about different BCI-spellers can be helpful, as it could identify suitable systems for first-hand users, as well as opportunities of development and learning from previous studies for BCI researchers. MDPI 2018-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5924393/ /pubmed/29601538 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8040057 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Rezeika, Aya
Benda, Mihaly
Stawicki, Piotr
Gembler, Felix
Saboor, Abdul
Volosyak, Ivan
Brain–Computer Interface Spellers: A Review
title Brain–Computer Interface Spellers: A Review
title_full Brain–Computer Interface Spellers: A Review
title_fullStr Brain–Computer Interface Spellers: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Brain–Computer Interface Spellers: A Review
title_short Brain–Computer Interface Spellers: A Review
title_sort brain–computer interface spellers: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5924393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29601538
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8040057
work_keys_str_mv AT rezeikaaya braincomputerinterfacespellersareview
AT bendamihaly braincomputerinterfacespellersareview
AT stawickipiotr braincomputerinterfacespellersareview
AT gemblerfelix braincomputerinterfacespellersareview
AT saboorabdul braincomputerinterfacespellersareview
AT volosyakivan braincomputerinterfacespellersareview