Cargando…
Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in Agrobacterium: A “Go/No Go System”?
The pathogen Agrobacterium induces gall formation on a wide range of dicotyledonous plants. In this bacteria, most pathogenicity determinants are borne on the tumour inducing (Ti) plasmid. The conjugative transfer of this plasmid between agrobacteria is regulated by quorum sensing (QS). However, pro...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5924552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29659511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9040210 |
_version_ | 1783318573656047616 |
---|---|
author | Dessaux, Yves Faure, Denis |
author_facet | Dessaux, Yves Faure, Denis |
author_sort | Dessaux, Yves |
collection | PubMed |
description | The pathogen Agrobacterium induces gall formation on a wide range of dicotyledonous plants. In this bacteria, most pathogenicity determinants are borne on the tumour inducing (Ti) plasmid. The conjugative transfer of this plasmid between agrobacteria is regulated by quorum sensing (QS). However, processes involved in the disturbance of QS also occur in this bacteria under the molecular form of a protein, TraM, inhibiting the sensing of the QS signals, and two lactonases BlcC (AttM) and AiiB that degrade the acylhomoserine lactone (AHL) QS signal. In the model Agrobacterium fabrum strain C58, several data, once integrated, strongly suggest that the QS regulation may not be reacting only to cell concentration. Rather, these QS elements in association with the quorum quenching (QQ) activities may constitute an integrated and complex “go/no go system” that finely controls the biologically costly transfer of the Ti plasmid in response to multiple environmental cues. This decision mechanism permits the bacteria to sense whether it is in a gall or not, in a living or decaying tumor, in stressed plant tissues, etc. In this scheme, the role of the lactonases selected and maintained in the course of Ti plasmid and agrobacterial evolution appears to be pivotal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5924552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59245522018-05-03 Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in Agrobacterium: A “Go/No Go System”? Dessaux, Yves Faure, Denis Genes (Basel) Review The pathogen Agrobacterium induces gall formation on a wide range of dicotyledonous plants. In this bacteria, most pathogenicity determinants are borne on the tumour inducing (Ti) plasmid. The conjugative transfer of this plasmid between agrobacteria is regulated by quorum sensing (QS). However, processes involved in the disturbance of QS also occur in this bacteria under the molecular form of a protein, TraM, inhibiting the sensing of the QS signals, and two lactonases BlcC (AttM) and AiiB that degrade the acylhomoserine lactone (AHL) QS signal. In the model Agrobacterium fabrum strain C58, several data, once integrated, strongly suggest that the QS regulation may not be reacting only to cell concentration. Rather, these QS elements in association with the quorum quenching (QQ) activities may constitute an integrated and complex “go/no go system” that finely controls the biologically costly transfer of the Ti plasmid in response to multiple environmental cues. This decision mechanism permits the bacteria to sense whether it is in a gall or not, in a living or decaying tumor, in stressed plant tissues, etc. In this scheme, the role of the lactonases selected and maintained in the course of Ti plasmid and agrobacterial evolution appears to be pivotal. MDPI 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5924552/ /pubmed/29659511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9040210 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Dessaux, Yves Faure, Denis Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in Agrobacterium: A “Go/No Go System”? |
title | Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in Agrobacterium: A “Go/No Go System”? |
title_full | Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in Agrobacterium: A “Go/No Go System”? |
title_fullStr | Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in Agrobacterium: A “Go/No Go System”? |
title_full_unstemmed | Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in Agrobacterium: A “Go/No Go System”? |
title_short | Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching in Agrobacterium: A “Go/No Go System”? |
title_sort | quorum sensing and quorum quenching in agrobacterium: a “go/no go system”? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5924552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29659511 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9040210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dessauxyves quorumsensingandquorumquenchinginagrobacteriumagonogosystem AT fauredenis quorumsensingandquorumquenchinginagrobacteriumagonogosystem |