Cargando…
Peri-Implant Bone Behavior after Single Drill versus Multiple Sequence for Osteotomy Drill
OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to compare the drilling protocol effect on osseointegration event in three commercially available titanium dental implants with different drill protocol using a rabbit tibia model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different drilling sequences were compared as follows:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5925187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9756043 |
_version_ | 1783318666551492608 |
---|---|
author | Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre Bettach, Raphaél Aramburú Júnior, Jaime Sardá Prados-Frutos, Juan Carlos Del Fabbro, Massimo Shibli, Jamil Awad |
author_facet | Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre Bettach, Raphaél Aramburú Júnior, Jaime Sardá Prados-Frutos, Juan Carlos Del Fabbro, Massimo Shibli, Jamil Awad |
author_sort | Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to compare the drilling protocol effect on osseointegration event in three commercially available titanium dental implants with different drill protocol using a rabbit tibia model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different drilling sequences were compared as follows: drilling sequence using a single unique drill of 4.2 mm conical implant (Group 1), drilling sequence using 3 consecutive cylindrical drills for a 4.1 mm cylindrical implant (Group 2), and drilling sequence using 3 consecutive conical drills for a 4.3 mm conical implant (Group 3). For each group, 18 drilling procedures and implant placements were performed, totalizing 54 commercially available titanium dental implants. The samples were removed 6 weeks after implantation. Resonance frequency analyses (RFA) were performed immediately after the implantation, and at 6 weeks removal torque test (RTt) and histological analysis were performed. RESULTS: The RFA measured showed statistical difference between the groups in time 1 and no significant statistical differences in time 2 (p > 0.05). In the RTt no significant difference was found between the 3 groups tested. Histomorphometric analysis showed no significant difference between groups in the bone-to-implant contact% (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the present preclinical study, osteotomy using a single bur did not show differences regarding the proposed and evaluated tests parameters for assessing the peri-implant behavior. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5925187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59251872018-05-30 Peri-Implant Bone Behavior after Single Drill versus Multiple Sequence for Osteotomy Drill Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre Bettach, Raphaél Aramburú Júnior, Jaime Sardá Prados-Frutos, Juan Carlos Del Fabbro, Massimo Shibli, Jamil Awad Biomed Res Int Research Article OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to compare the drilling protocol effect on osseointegration event in three commercially available titanium dental implants with different drill protocol using a rabbit tibia model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three different drilling sequences were compared as follows: drilling sequence using a single unique drill of 4.2 mm conical implant (Group 1), drilling sequence using 3 consecutive cylindrical drills for a 4.1 mm cylindrical implant (Group 2), and drilling sequence using 3 consecutive conical drills for a 4.3 mm conical implant (Group 3). For each group, 18 drilling procedures and implant placements were performed, totalizing 54 commercially available titanium dental implants. The samples were removed 6 weeks after implantation. Resonance frequency analyses (RFA) were performed immediately after the implantation, and at 6 weeks removal torque test (RTt) and histological analysis were performed. RESULTS: The RFA measured showed statistical difference between the groups in time 1 and no significant statistical differences in time 2 (p > 0.05). In the RTt no significant difference was found between the 3 groups tested. Histomorphometric analysis showed no significant difference between groups in the bone-to-implant contact% (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In the present preclinical study, osteotomy using a single bur did not show differences regarding the proposed and evaluated tests parameters for assessing the peri-implant behavior. Hindawi 2018-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5925187/ /pubmed/29850594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9756043 Text en Copyright © 2018 Sergio Alexandre Gehrke et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre Bettach, Raphaél Aramburú Júnior, Jaime Sardá Prados-Frutos, Juan Carlos Del Fabbro, Massimo Shibli, Jamil Awad Peri-Implant Bone Behavior after Single Drill versus Multiple Sequence for Osteotomy Drill |
title | Peri-Implant Bone Behavior after Single Drill versus Multiple Sequence for Osteotomy Drill |
title_full | Peri-Implant Bone Behavior after Single Drill versus Multiple Sequence for Osteotomy Drill |
title_fullStr | Peri-Implant Bone Behavior after Single Drill versus Multiple Sequence for Osteotomy Drill |
title_full_unstemmed | Peri-Implant Bone Behavior after Single Drill versus Multiple Sequence for Osteotomy Drill |
title_short | Peri-Implant Bone Behavior after Single Drill versus Multiple Sequence for Osteotomy Drill |
title_sort | peri-implant bone behavior after single drill versus multiple sequence for osteotomy drill |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5925187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9756043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gehrkesergioalexandre periimplantbonebehavioraftersingledrillversusmultiplesequenceforosteotomydrill AT bettachraphael periimplantbonebehavioraftersingledrillversusmultiplesequenceforosteotomydrill AT aramburujuniorjaimesarda periimplantbonebehavioraftersingledrillversusmultiplesequenceforosteotomydrill AT pradosfrutosjuancarlos periimplantbonebehavioraftersingledrillversusmultiplesequenceforosteotomydrill AT delfabbromassimo periimplantbonebehavioraftersingledrillversusmultiplesequenceforosteotomydrill AT shiblijamilawad periimplantbonebehavioraftersingledrillversusmultiplesequenceforosteotomydrill |