Cargando…

Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression

BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a new type of physiotherapy technology that has been widely used in the research of depression. Although many clinical trials have found that compared to the placebo interventions, rTMS has a significant effect on the improvement of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5925584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29719344
http://dx.doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217106
_version_ 1783318743478173696
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a new type of physiotherapy technology that has been widely used in the research of depression. Although many clinical trials have found that compared to the placebo interventions, rTMS has a significant effect on the improvement of depressive symptoms, the outcomes remain inconsistent due to differences in rTMS treatment frequency, parameter settings, and site for stimulation. AIMS: This study systematically evaluated the safety and efficacy of rTMS combined with antidepressants for the treatment of depression in Chinese and English randomized, double-blind and sham controlled trials and explored the possible related factors affecting the efficacy and safety. METHODS: We used keywords “depression” and “transcranial magnetic Stimulaton” as filters to search for the Clinical Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of rTMS treatments for depression both in Chinese electronic databases: Wan fang, Wellpresi, and China Knowledge Network and in English electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library (total 8 databases) up to January 5, 2017; assessed the quality of the included studies with Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool; and according to the trial groups performed statistical analysis of the efficacy and safety presented in the included studies with RevMan5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 9798 articles were retrieved, and finally, 29 studies were included in this study, with a total sample size of 1659, in which the sample size of the study groups was 838, and the control group sample size was 821. After Meta-analysis, we found that treatment combined rTMS with antidepressants improves depressive symptoms in patients with depression (SDM=-0.84, 95%CI=-1.19 (~) -0.48). Based on the Cochrane risk bias Assessment tool, an assessment of the bias of the included studies was conducted, one of which was assessed as having a “high risk of bias” and others as “impossible to judge”. None of the included studies reported significant adverse events, and Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences in dropout rate between the two groups (RR=1.27, 95%CI: 0.75(~)2.12, Z=0.89, p=0.37). CONCLUSION: treatment that combined rTMS with antidepressant medication for depressive symptoms has a certain therapeutic advantage versus the placebo controls, demonstrated slight side effects, and attained good acceptability, but the differences between trials remained relatively large. Clinical trials with large sample sizes are required for further exploration of the possible related factors affecting the efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5925584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59255842018-05-01 Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression Shanghai Arch Psychiatry Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a new type of physiotherapy technology that has been widely used in the research of depression. Although many clinical trials have found that compared to the placebo interventions, rTMS has a significant effect on the improvement of depressive symptoms, the outcomes remain inconsistent due to differences in rTMS treatment frequency, parameter settings, and site for stimulation. AIMS: This study systematically evaluated the safety and efficacy of rTMS combined with antidepressants for the treatment of depression in Chinese and English randomized, double-blind and sham controlled trials and explored the possible related factors affecting the efficacy and safety. METHODS: We used keywords “depression” and “transcranial magnetic Stimulaton” as filters to search for the Clinical Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) of rTMS treatments for depression both in Chinese electronic databases: Wan fang, Wellpresi, and China Knowledge Network and in English electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library (total 8 databases) up to January 5, 2017; assessed the quality of the included studies with Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool; and according to the trial groups performed statistical analysis of the efficacy and safety presented in the included studies with RevMan5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 9798 articles were retrieved, and finally, 29 studies were included in this study, with a total sample size of 1659, in which the sample size of the study groups was 838, and the control group sample size was 821. After Meta-analysis, we found that treatment combined rTMS with antidepressants improves depressive symptoms in patients with depression (SDM=-0.84, 95%CI=-1.19 (~) -0.48). Based on the Cochrane risk bias Assessment tool, an assessment of the bias of the included studies was conducted, one of which was assessed as having a “high risk of bias” and others as “impossible to judge”. None of the included studies reported significant adverse events, and Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences in dropout rate between the two groups (RR=1.27, 95%CI: 0.75(~)2.12, Z=0.89, p=0.37). CONCLUSION: treatment that combined rTMS with antidepressant medication for depressive symptoms has a certain therapeutic advantage versus the placebo controls, demonstrated slight side effects, and attained good acceptability, but the differences between trials remained relatively large. Clinical trials with large sample sizes are required for further exploration of the possible related factors affecting the efficacy. Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Publishing 2017-12-25 2017-12-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5925584/ /pubmed/29719344 http://dx.doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217106 Text en © Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Publishing http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
spellingShingle Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression
title Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression
title_full Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression
title_fullStr Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression
title_short Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the Treatment of Depression
title_sort meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rtms) in the treatment of depression
topic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5925584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29719344
http://dx.doi.org/10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217106
work_keys_str_mv AT metaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationrtmsinthetreatmentofdepression
AT metaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationrtmsinthetreatmentofdepression
AT metaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationrtmsinthetreatmentofdepression
AT metaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationrtmsinthetreatmentofdepression
AT metaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationrtmsinthetreatmentofdepression
AT metaanalysisoftheefficacyandsafetyofrepetitivetranscranialmagneticstimulationrtmsinthetreatmentofdepression