Cargando…
Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians
PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of negotiation training delivered to senior clinicians, managers and executives, by exploring whether staff members implemented negotiation skills in their workplace following the training, and if so, how and when. DESIGN/METHODOLOG...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Emerald Publishing Limited
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5925852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29624132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2017-0333 |
_version_ | 1783318781048651776 |
---|---|
author | Clay-Williams, Robyn Johnson, Andrew Lane, Paul Li, Zhicheng Camilleri, Lauren Winata, Teresa Klug, Michael |
author_facet | Clay-Williams, Robyn Johnson, Andrew Lane, Paul Li, Zhicheng Camilleri, Lauren Winata, Teresa Klug, Michael |
author_sort | Clay-Williams, Robyn |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of negotiation training delivered to senior clinicians, managers and executives, by exploring whether staff members implemented negotiation skills in their workplace following the training, and if so, how and when. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This is a qualitative study involving face-to-face interviews with 18 senior clinicians, managers and executives who completed a two-day intensive negotiation skills training course. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inductive interpretive analysis techniques were used to identify common themes. Research setting was a large tertiary care hospital and health service in regional Australia. FINDINGS: Participants generally reported positive affective and utility reactions to the training, and attempted to implement at least some of the skills in the workplace. The main enabler was provision of a Negotiation Toolkit to assist in preparing and conducting negotiations. The main barrier was lack of time to reflect on the principles and prepare for upcoming negotiations. Participants reported that ongoing skill development and retention were not adequately addressed; suggestions for improving sustainability included provision of refresher training and mentoring. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Limitations include self-reported data, and interview questions positively elicited examples of training translation. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The training was well matched to participant needs, with negotiation a common and daily activity for most healthcare professionals. Implementation of the skills showed potential for improving collaboration and problem solving in the workplace. Practical examples of how the skills were used in the workplace are provided. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first international study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of an integrative bargaining negotiation training program targeting executives, senior clinicians and management staff in a large healthcare organization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5925852 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59258522018-05-29 Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians Clay-Williams, Robyn Johnson, Andrew Lane, Paul Li, Zhicheng Camilleri, Lauren Winata, Teresa Klug, Michael J Health Organ Manag Research Paper PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of negotiation training delivered to senior clinicians, managers and executives, by exploring whether staff members implemented negotiation skills in their workplace following the training, and if so, how and when. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This is a qualitative study involving face-to-face interviews with 18 senior clinicians, managers and executives who completed a two-day intensive negotiation skills training course. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inductive interpretive analysis techniques were used to identify common themes. Research setting was a large tertiary care hospital and health service in regional Australia. FINDINGS: Participants generally reported positive affective and utility reactions to the training, and attempted to implement at least some of the skills in the workplace. The main enabler was provision of a Negotiation Toolkit to assist in preparing and conducting negotiations. The main barrier was lack of time to reflect on the principles and prepare for upcoming negotiations. Participants reported that ongoing skill development and retention were not adequately addressed; suggestions for improving sustainability included provision of refresher training and mentoring. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Limitations include self-reported data, and interview questions positively elicited examples of training translation. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The training was well matched to participant needs, with negotiation a common and daily activity for most healthcare professionals. Implementation of the skills showed potential for improving collaboration and problem solving in the workplace. Practical examples of how the skills were used in the workplace are provided. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first international study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of an integrative bargaining negotiation training program targeting executives, senior clinicians and management staff in a large healthcare organization. Emerald Publishing Limited 2018-04-09 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5925852/ /pubmed/29624132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2017-0333 Text en © Robyn Clay-Williams, Andrew Johnson, Paul Lane, Zhicheng Li, Lauren Camilleri, Teresa Winata and Michael Klug Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial & non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Clay-Williams, Robyn Johnson, Andrew Lane, Paul Li, Zhicheng Camilleri, Lauren Winata, Teresa Klug, Michael Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians |
title | Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians |
title_full | Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians |
title_fullStr | Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians |
title_full_unstemmed | Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians |
title_short | Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians |
title_sort | collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5925852/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29624132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2017-0333 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claywilliamsrobyn collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians AT johnsonandrew collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians AT lanepaul collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians AT lizhicheng collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians AT camillerilauren collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians AT winatateresa collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians AT klugmichael collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians |