Cargando…

Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of negotiation training delivered to senior clinicians, managers and executives, by exploring whether staff members implemented negotiation skills in their workplace following the training, and if so, how and when. DESIGN/METHODOLOG...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clay-Williams, Robyn, Johnson, Andrew, Lane, Paul, Li, Zhicheng, Camilleri, Lauren, Winata, Teresa, Klug, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Emerald Publishing Limited 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5925852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29624132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2017-0333
_version_ 1783318781048651776
author Clay-Williams, Robyn
Johnson, Andrew
Lane, Paul
Li, Zhicheng
Camilleri, Lauren
Winata, Teresa
Klug, Michael
author_facet Clay-Williams, Robyn
Johnson, Andrew
Lane, Paul
Li, Zhicheng
Camilleri, Lauren
Winata, Teresa
Klug, Michael
author_sort Clay-Williams, Robyn
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of negotiation training delivered to senior clinicians, managers and executives, by exploring whether staff members implemented negotiation skills in their workplace following the training, and if so, how and when. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This is a qualitative study involving face-to-face interviews with 18 senior clinicians, managers and executives who completed a two-day intensive negotiation skills training course. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inductive interpretive analysis techniques were used to identify common themes. Research setting was a large tertiary care hospital and health service in regional Australia. FINDINGS: Participants generally reported positive affective and utility reactions to the training, and attempted to implement at least some of the skills in the workplace. The main enabler was provision of a Negotiation Toolkit to assist in preparing and conducting negotiations. The main barrier was lack of time to reflect on the principles and prepare for upcoming negotiations. Participants reported that ongoing skill development and retention were not adequately addressed; suggestions for improving sustainability included provision of refresher training and mentoring. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Limitations include self-reported data, and interview questions positively elicited examples of training translation. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The training was well matched to participant needs, with negotiation a common and daily activity for most healthcare professionals. Implementation of the skills showed potential for improving collaboration and problem solving in the workplace. Practical examples of how the skills were used in the workplace are provided. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first international study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of an integrative bargaining negotiation training program targeting executives, senior clinicians and management staff in a large healthcare organization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5925852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Emerald Publishing Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59258522018-05-29 Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians Clay-Williams, Robyn Johnson, Andrew Lane, Paul Li, Zhicheng Camilleri, Lauren Winata, Teresa Klug, Michael J Health Organ Manag Research Paper PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of negotiation training delivered to senior clinicians, managers and executives, by exploring whether staff members implemented negotiation skills in their workplace following the training, and if so, how and when. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: This is a qualitative study involving face-to-face interviews with 18 senior clinicians, managers and executives who completed a two-day intensive negotiation skills training course. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and inductive interpretive analysis techniques were used to identify common themes. Research setting was a large tertiary care hospital and health service in regional Australia. FINDINGS: Participants generally reported positive affective and utility reactions to the training, and attempted to implement at least some of the skills in the workplace. The main enabler was provision of a Negotiation Toolkit to assist in preparing and conducting negotiations. The main barrier was lack of time to reflect on the principles and prepare for upcoming negotiations. Participants reported that ongoing skill development and retention were not adequately addressed; suggestions for improving sustainability included provision of refresher training and mentoring. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Limitations include self-reported data, and interview questions positively elicited examples of training translation. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The training was well matched to participant needs, with negotiation a common and daily activity for most healthcare professionals. Implementation of the skills showed potential for improving collaboration and problem solving in the workplace. Practical examples of how the skills were used in the workplace are provided. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first international study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of an integrative bargaining negotiation training program targeting executives, senior clinicians and management staff in a large healthcare organization. Emerald Publishing Limited 2018-04-09 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5925852/ /pubmed/29624132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2017-0333 Text en © Robyn Clay-Williams, Andrew Johnson, Paul Lane, Zhicheng Li, Lauren Camilleri, Teresa Winata and Michael Klug Published by Emerald Publishing Limited. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) licence. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial & non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
spellingShingle Research Paper
Clay-Williams, Robyn
Johnson, Andrew
Lane, Paul
Li, Zhicheng
Camilleri, Lauren
Winata, Teresa
Klug, Michael
Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians
title Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians
title_full Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians
title_fullStr Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians
title_full_unstemmed Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians
title_short Collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians
title_sort collaboration in a competitive healthcare system: negotiation 101 for clinicians
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5925852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29624132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-12-2017-0333
work_keys_str_mv AT claywilliamsrobyn collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians
AT johnsonandrew collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians
AT lanepaul collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians
AT lizhicheng collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians
AT camillerilauren collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians
AT winatateresa collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians
AT klugmichael collaborationinacompetitivehealthcaresystemnegotiation101forclinicians