Cargando…

Differential Induction of Apoptosis in B16 Melanoma and EL‐4 Lymphoma Cells by Cytostatin and Bactobolin

Most solid tumor cells are less sensitive to apoptosis induced by anticancer drugs than hematopoietic cancer cells. However, the mechanisms of the different responses to apoptosis in these cell types remain unknown. To explore this question, we used B16 melanoma and EL‐4 lymphoma cells as solid tumo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kawada, Manabu, Amemiya, Masahide, Ishizuka, Masaaki, Takeuchi, Tomio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5926052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10189893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00736.x
_version_ 1783318825991667712
author Kawada, Manabu
Amemiya, Masahide
Ishizuka, Masaaki
Takeuchi, Tomio
author_facet Kawada, Manabu
Amemiya, Masahide
Ishizuka, Masaaki
Takeuchi, Tomio
author_sort Kawada, Manabu
collection PubMed
description Most solid tumor cells are less sensitive to apoptosis induced by anticancer drugs than hematopoietic cancer cells. However, the mechanisms of the different responses to apoptosis in these cell types remain unknown. To explore this question, we used B16 melanoma and EL‐4 lymphoma cells as solid tumor‐ and hematopoietic cancer‐derived cell lines, and examined the effects of two apoptosis inducers, cytostatin and bactobolin, on both cell lines. Apoptosis in B16 cells was induced strongly by bactobolin, but weakly by cytostatin. In contrast, apoptosis in EL‐4 cells was induced strongly by cytostatin, but weakly by bactobolin. While caspase‐3 was activated upon induction of apoptosis in both cell lines, Ac‐DEVD‐CHO, a specific inhibitor of caspase‐3, suppressed only the apoptosis in B16 cells. In B16 cells, cyclins E, A, and B1 were decreased by strongly apoptosis‐inducing bactobolin prior to apoptosis commitment, but cyclin E was not decreased by weakly apoptosis‐inducing cytostatin. On the other hand, in EL‐4 cells cyclins D1, E, A, and B1 were decreased by strongly apoptosis‐inducing cytostatin prior to apoptosis commitment, but neither cyclin A nor B1 was decreased by weakly apoptosis‐inducing bactobolin. These results indicate that the dependency of apoptosis induction on caspase activity is different between the two cell lines. Furthermore, there may be an inverse correlation between specific cyclins and apoptosis induction in the two cell lines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5926052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59260522018-05-11 Differential Induction of Apoptosis in B16 Melanoma and EL‐4 Lymphoma Cells by Cytostatin and Bactobolin Kawada, Manabu Amemiya, Masahide Ishizuka, Masaaki Takeuchi, Tomio Jpn J Cancer Res Article Most solid tumor cells are less sensitive to apoptosis induced by anticancer drugs than hematopoietic cancer cells. However, the mechanisms of the different responses to apoptosis in these cell types remain unknown. To explore this question, we used B16 melanoma and EL‐4 lymphoma cells as solid tumor‐ and hematopoietic cancer‐derived cell lines, and examined the effects of two apoptosis inducers, cytostatin and bactobolin, on both cell lines. Apoptosis in B16 cells was induced strongly by bactobolin, but weakly by cytostatin. In contrast, apoptosis in EL‐4 cells was induced strongly by cytostatin, but weakly by bactobolin. While caspase‐3 was activated upon induction of apoptosis in both cell lines, Ac‐DEVD‐CHO, a specific inhibitor of caspase‐3, suppressed only the apoptosis in B16 cells. In B16 cells, cyclins E, A, and B1 were decreased by strongly apoptosis‐inducing bactobolin prior to apoptosis commitment, but cyclin E was not decreased by weakly apoptosis‐inducing cytostatin. On the other hand, in EL‐4 cells cyclins D1, E, A, and B1 were decreased by strongly apoptosis‐inducing cytostatin prior to apoptosis commitment, but neither cyclin A nor B1 was decreased by weakly apoptosis‐inducing bactobolin. These results indicate that the dependency of apoptosis induction on caspase activity is different between the two cell lines. Furthermore, there may be an inverse correlation between specific cyclins and apoptosis induction in the two cell lines. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1999-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5926052/ /pubmed/10189893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00736.x Text en
spellingShingle Article
Kawada, Manabu
Amemiya, Masahide
Ishizuka, Masaaki
Takeuchi, Tomio
Differential Induction of Apoptosis in B16 Melanoma and EL‐4 Lymphoma Cells by Cytostatin and Bactobolin
title Differential Induction of Apoptosis in B16 Melanoma and EL‐4 Lymphoma Cells by Cytostatin and Bactobolin
title_full Differential Induction of Apoptosis in B16 Melanoma and EL‐4 Lymphoma Cells by Cytostatin and Bactobolin
title_fullStr Differential Induction of Apoptosis in B16 Melanoma and EL‐4 Lymphoma Cells by Cytostatin and Bactobolin
title_full_unstemmed Differential Induction of Apoptosis in B16 Melanoma and EL‐4 Lymphoma Cells by Cytostatin and Bactobolin
title_short Differential Induction of Apoptosis in B16 Melanoma and EL‐4 Lymphoma Cells by Cytostatin and Bactobolin
title_sort differential induction of apoptosis in b16 melanoma and el‐4 lymphoma cells by cytostatin and bactobolin
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5926052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10189893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00736.x
work_keys_str_mv AT kawadamanabu differentialinductionofapoptosisinb16melanomaandel4lymphomacellsbycytostatinandbactobolin
AT amemiyamasahide differentialinductionofapoptosisinb16melanomaandel4lymphomacellsbycytostatinandbactobolin
AT ishizukamasaaki differentialinductionofapoptosisinb16melanomaandel4lymphomacellsbycytostatinandbactobolin
AT takeuchitomio differentialinductionofapoptosisinb16melanomaandel4lymphomacellsbycytostatinandbactobolin