Cargando…

Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence and risk factors for visual field defect in patients with optic disc drusen (ODD). METHODS: We assessed the visual field status of patients with ODD whose diagnosis were confirmed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Visual field defects we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Kyoung Min, Woo, Se Joon, Hwang, Jeong-Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5927402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196001
_version_ 1783319076630691840
author Lee, Kyoung Min
Woo, Se Joon
Hwang, Jeong-Min
author_facet Lee, Kyoung Min
Woo, Se Joon
Hwang, Jeong-Min
author_sort Lee, Kyoung Min
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence and risk factors for visual field defect in patients with optic disc drusen (ODD). METHODS: We assessed the visual field status of patients with ODD whose diagnosis were confirmed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Visual field defects were classified as normal, enlarged blind spot, or other defects. ODD were classified into either type 1 (without hyperreflective border and heterogenic internal reflectance) or type 2 (with hyperreflective border and lower internal reflectance). The prevalence and risk factors for each visual field defect was analyzed using logistic regression analysis and classification and regression tree (CART) modeling. RESULTS: Of the 40 eyes with ODD, 33 (83%) eyes were categorized as type 1 and 7 (17%) eyes were categorized as type 2 ODD. Regarding the visual field defects, 19 (48%) eyes showed normal visual field, 11 (28%) eyes showed enlarged blind spot, and 9 (24%) eyes showed other defects. The latter was more frequent in type 2 ODD (P = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the factor associated with other defects was the thinning of the average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) (per 10 μm decrease, OR = 3.436, P = 0.004), and the factor associated with enlarged blind spot was the height of ODD (per 100 μm increase, OR = 3.956, P = 0.023). CART modeling revealed that the average RNFL thickness lesser than 85.5 μm, and then the ODD height larger than 348 μm were the best split-up factors for predicting the type of visual field defects. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, one-quarter of ODD patients showed abnormal visual field defect other than enlarged blind spot. These other visual field defects appeared to be associated with the axonal loss in the eyes with type 2 ODD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5927402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59274022018-05-11 Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen Lee, Kyoung Min Woo, Se Joon Hwang, Jeong-Min PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence and risk factors for visual field defect in patients with optic disc drusen (ODD). METHODS: We assessed the visual field status of patients with ODD whose diagnosis were confirmed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Visual field defects were classified as normal, enlarged blind spot, or other defects. ODD were classified into either type 1 (without hyperreflective border and heterogenic internal reflectance) or type 2 (with hyperreflective border and lower internal reflectance). The prevalence and risk factors for each visual field defect was analyzed using logistic regression analysis and classification and regression tree (CART) modeling. RESULTS: Of the 40 eyes with ODD, 33 (83%) eyes were categorized as type 1 and 7 (17%) eyes were categorized as type 2 ODD. Regarding the visual field defects, 19 (48%) eyes showed normal visual field, 11 (28%) eyes showed enlarged blind spot, and 9 (24%) eyes showed other defects. The latter was more frequent in type 2 ODD (P = 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that the factor associated with other defects was the thinning of the average retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) (per 10 μm decrease, OR = 3.436, P = 0.004), and the factor associated with enlarged blind spot was the height of ODD (per 100 μm increase, OR = 3.956, P = 0.023). CART modeling revealed that the average RNFL thickness lesser than 85.5 μm, and then the ODD height larger than 348 μm were the best split-up factors for predicting the type of visual field defects. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, one-quarter of ODD patients showed abnormal visual field defect other than enlarged blind spot. These other visual field defects appeared to be associated with the axonal loss in the eyes with type 2 ODD. Public Library of Science 2018-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5927402/ /pubmed/29708976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196001 Text en © 2018 Lee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lee, Kyoung Min
Woo, Se Joon
Hwang, Jeong-Min
Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen
title Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen
title_full Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen
title_fullStr Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen
title_short Factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen
title_sort factors associated with visual field defects of optic disc drusen
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5927402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196001
work_keys_str_mv AT leekyoungmin factorsassociatedwithvisualfielddefectsofopticdiscdrusen
AT woosejoon factorsassociatedwithvisualfielddefectsofopticdiscdrusen
AT hwangjeongmin factorsassociatedwithvisualfielddefectsofopticdiscdrusen