Cargando…

Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing

Cardiac tissue engineering, which combines cells and supportive scaffolds, is an emerging treatment for restoring cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI), although, the optimal construct remains a challenge. We developed two engineered cardiac grafts, based on decellularized scaffolds from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perea-Gil, Isaac, Gálvez-Montón, Carolina, Prat-Vidal, Cristina, Jorba, Ignasi, Segú-Vergés, Cristina, Roura, Santiago, Soler-Botija, Carolina, Iborra-Egea, Oriol, Revuelta-López, Elena, Fernández, Marco A., Farré, Ramon, Navajas, Daniel, Bayes-Genis, Antoni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29712965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25115-2
_version_ 1783319187832176640
author Perea-Gil, Isaac
Gálvez-Montón, Carolina
Prat-Vidal, Cristina
Jorba, Ignasi
Segú-Vergés, Cristina
Roura, Santiago
Soler-Botija, Carolina
Iborra-Egea, Oriol
Revuelta-López, Elena
Fernández, Marco A.
Farré, Ramon
Navajas, Daniel
Bayes-Genis, Antoni
author_facet Perea-Gil, Isaac
Gálvez-Montón, Carolina
Prat-Vidal, Cristina
Jorba, Ignasi
Segú-Vergés, Cristina
Roura, Santiago
Soler-Botija, Carolina
Iborra-Egea, Oriol
Revuelta-López, Elena
Fernández, Marco A.
Farré, Ramon
Navajas, Daniel
Bayes-Genis, Antoni
author_sort Perea-Gil, Isaac
collection PubMed
description Cardiac tissue engineering, which combines cells and supportive scaffolds, is an emerging treatment for restoring cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI), although, the optimal construct remains a challenge. We developed two engineered cardiac grafts, based on decellularized scaffolds from myocardial and pericardial tissues and repopulated them with adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells (ATMSCs). The structure, macromechanical and micromechanical scaffold properties were preserved upon the decellularization and recellularization processes, except for recellularized myocardium micromechanics that was ∼2-fold stiffer than native tissue and decellularized scaffolds. Proteome characterization of the two acellular matrices showed enrichment of matrisome proteins and major cardiac extracellular matrix components, considerably higher for the recellularized pericardium. Moreover, the pericardial scaffold demonstrated better cell penetrance and retention, as well as a bigger pore size. Both engineered cardiac grafts were further evaluated in pre-clinical MI swine models. Forty days after graft implantation, swine treated with the engineered cardiac grafts showed significant ventricular function recovery. Irrespective of the scaffold origin or cell recolonization, all scaffolds integrated with the underlying myocardium and showed signs of neovascularization and nerve sprouting. Collectively, engineered cardiac grafts -with pericardial or myocardial scaffolds- were effective in restoring cardiac function post-MI, and pericardial scaffolds showed better structural integrity and recolonization capability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5928167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59281672018-05-07 Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing Perea-Gil, Isaac Gálvez-Montón, Carolina Prat-Vidal, Cristina Jorba, Ignasi Segú-Vergés, Cristina Roura, Santiago Soler-Botija, Carolina Iborra-Egea, Oriol Revuelta-López, Elena Fernández, Marco A. Farré, Ramon Navajas, Daniel Bayes-Genis, Antoni Sci Rep Article Cardiac tissue engineering, which combines cells and supportive scaffolds, is an emerging treatment for restoring cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI), although, the optimal construct remains a challenge. We developed two engineered cardiac grafts, based on decellularized scaffolds from myocardial and pericardial tissues and repopulated them with adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells (ATMSCs). The structure, macromechanical and micromechanical scaffold properties were preserved upon the decellularization and recellularization processes, except for recellularized myocardium micromechanics that was ∼2-fold stiffer than native tissue and decellularized scaffolds. Proteome characterization of the two acellular matrices showed enrichment of matrisome proteins and major cardiac extracellular matrix components, considerably higher for the recellularized pericardium. Moreover, the pericardial scaffold demonstrated better cell penetrance and retention, as well as a bigger pore size. Both engineered cardiac grafts were further evaluated in pre-clinical MI swine models. Forty days after graft implantation, swine treated with the engineered cardiac grafts showed significant ventricular function recovery. Irrespective of the scaffold origin or cell recolonization, all scaffolds integrated with the underlying myocardium and showed signs of neovascularization and nerve sprouting. Collectively, engineered cardiac grafts -with pericardial or myocardial scaffolds- were effective in restoring cardiac function post-MI, and pericardial scaffolds showed better structural integrity and recolonization capability. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5928167/ /pubmed/29712965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25115-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Perea-Gil, Isaac
Gálvez-Montón, Carolina
Prat-Vidal, Cristina
Jorba, Ignasi
Segú-Vergés, Cristina
Roura, Santiago
Soler-Botija, Carolina
Iborra-Egea, Oriol
Revuelta-López, Elena
Fernández, Marco A.
Farré, Ramon
Navajas, Daniel
Bayes-Genis, Antoni
Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing
title Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing
title_full Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing
title_fullStr Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing
title_full_unstemmed Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing
title_short Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing
title_sort head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: from scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29712965
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25115-2
work_keys_str_mv AT pereagilisaac headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting
AT galvezmontoncarolina headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting
AT pratvidalcristina headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting
AT jorbaignasi headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting
AT seguvergescristina headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting
AT rourasantiago headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting
AT solerbotijacarolina headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting
AT iborraegeaoriol headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting
AT revueltalopezelena headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting
AT fernandezmarcoa headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting
AT farreramon headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting
AT navajasdaniel headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting
AT bayesgenisantoni headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting