Cargando…
Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing
Cardiac tissue engineering, which combines cells and supportive scaffolds, is an emerging treatment for restoring cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI), although, the optimal construct remains a challenge. We developed two engineered cardiac grafts, based on decellularized scaffolds from...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29712965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25115-2 |
_version_ | 1783319187832176640 |
---|---|
author | Perea-Gil, Isaac Gálvez-Montón, Carolina Prat-Vidal, Cristina Jorba, Ignasi Segú-Vergés, Cristina Roura, Santiago Soler-Botija, Carolina Iborra-Egea, Oriol Revuelta-López, Elena Fernández, Marco A. Farré, Ramon Navajas, Daniel Bayes-Genis, Antoni |
author_facet | Perea-Gil, Isaac Gálvez-Montón, Carolina Prat-Vidal, Cristina Jorba, Ignasi Segú-Vergés, Cristina Roura, Santiago Soler-Botija, Carolina Iborra-Egea, Oriol Revuelta-López, Elena Fernández, Marco A. Farré, Ramon Navajas, Daniel Bayes-Genis, Antoni |
author_sort | Perea-Gil, Isaac |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cardiac tissue engineering, which combines cells and supportive scaffolds, is an emerging treatment for restoring cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI), although, the optimal construct remains a challenge. We developed two engineered cardiac grafts, based on decellularized scaffolds from myocardial and pericardial tissues and repopulated them with adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells (ATMSCs). The structure, macromechanical and micromechanical scaffold properties were preserved upon the decellularization and recellularization processes, except for recellularized myocardium micromechanics that was ∼2-fold stiffer than native tissue and decellularized scaffolds. Proteome characterization of the two acellular matrices showed enrichment of matrisome proteins and major cardiac extracellular matrix components, considerably higher for the recellularized pericardium. Moreover, the pericardial scaffold demonstrated better cell penetrance and retention, as well as a bigger pore size. Both engineered cardiac grafts were further evaluated in pre-clinical MI swine models. Forty days after graft implantation, swine treated with the engineered cardiac grafts showed significant ventricular function recovery. Irrespective of the scaffold origin or cell recolonization, all scaffolds integrated with the underlying myocardium and showed signs of neovascularization and nerve sprouting. Collectively, engineered cardiac grafts -with pericardial or myocardial scaffolds- were effective in restoring cardiac function post-MI, and pericardial scaffolds showed better structural integrity and recolonization capability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5928167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59281672018-05-07 Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing Perea-Gil, Isaac Gálvez-Montón, Carolina Prat-Vidal, Cristina Jorba, Ignasi Segú-Vergés, Cristina Roura, Santiago Soler-Botija, Carolina Iborra-Egea, Oriol Revuelta-López, Elena Fernández, Marco A. Farré, Ramon Navajas, Daniel Bayes-Genis, Antoni Sci Rep Article Cardiac tissue engineering, which combines cells and supportive scaffolds, is an emerging treatment for restoring cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI), although, the optimal construct remains a challenge. We developed two engineered cardiac grafts, based on decellularized scaffolds from myocardial and pericardial tissues and repopulated them with adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells (ATMSCs). The structure, macromechanical and micromechanical scaffold properties were preserved upon the decellularization and recellularization processes, except for recellularized myocardium micromechanics that was ∼2-fold stiffer than native tissue and decellularized scaffolds. Proteome characterization of the two acellular matrices showed enrichment of matrisome proteins and major cardiac extracellular matrix components, considerably higher for the recellularized pericardium. Moreover, the pericardial scaffold demonstrated better cell penetrance and retention, as well as a bigger pore size. Both engineered cardiac grafts were further evaluated in pre-clinical MI swine models. Forty days after graft implantation, swine treated with the engineered cardiac grafts showed significant ventricular function recovery. Irrespective of the scaffold origin or cell recolonization, all scaffolds integrated with the underlying myocardium and showed signs of neovascularization and nerve sprouting. Collectively, engineered cardiac grafts -with pericardial or myocardial scaffolds- were effective in restoring cardiac function post-MI, and pericardial scaffolds showed better structural integrity and recolonization capability. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5928167/ /pubmed/29712965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25115-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Perea-Gil, Isaac Gálvez-Montón, Carolina Prat-Vidal, Cristina Jorba, Ignasi Segú-Vergés, Cristina Roura, Santiago Soler-Botija, Carolina Iborra-Egea, Oriol Revuelta-López, Elena Fernández, Marco A. Farré, Ramon Navajas, Daniel Bayes-Genis, Antoni Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing |
title | Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing |
title_full | Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing |
title_fullStr | Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing |
title_short | Head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: From scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing |
title_sort | head-to-head comparison of two engineered cardiac grafts for myocardial repair: from scaffold characterization to pre-clinical testing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29712965 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25115-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pereagilisaac headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting AT galvezmontoncarolina headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting AT pratvidalcristina headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting AT jorbaignasi headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting AT seguvergescristina headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting AT rourasantiago headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting AT solerbotijacarolina headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting AT iborraegeaoriol headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting AT revueltalopezelena headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting AT fernandezmarcoa headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting AT farreramon headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting AT navajasdaniel headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting AT bayesgenisantoni headtoheadcomparisonoftwoengineeredcardiacgraftsformyocardialrepairfromscaffoldcharacterizationtopreclinicaltesting |