Cargando…

Associations Between Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Complications for Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

PURPOSE: To examine the associations between sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and complications among older patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: We identified women from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare dataset...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Killelea, Brigid K., Long, Jessica B., Dang, Weixiong, Mougalian, Sarah S., Evans, Suzanne B., Gross, Cary P., Wang, Shi-Yi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29516364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6410-0
_version_ 1783319191738122240
author Killelea, Brigid K.
Long, Jessica B.
Dang, Weixiong
Mougalian, Sarah S.
Evans, Suzanne B.
Gross, Cary P.
Wang, Shi-Yi
author_facet Killelea, Brigid K.
Long, Jessica B.
Dang, Weixiong
Mougalian, Sarah S.
Evans, Suzanne B.
Gross, Cary P.
Wang, Shi-Yi
author_sort Killelea, Brigid K.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To examine the associations between sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and complications among older patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: We identified women from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare dataset aged 67–94 years diagnosed during 1998–2011 with DCIS who underwent BCS as initial treatment. We assessed incidence of complications, including lymphedema, wound infection, seroma, or pain, within 9 months of diagnosis. We used Mahalanobis matching and generalized linear models to estimate the associations between SLNB and complications. RESULTS: Our sample consisted of 15,515 beneficiaries, 2409 (15.5%) of whom received SLNB. Overall, 16.8% of women who received SLNB had complications, compared with 11.3% of women who did not receive SLNB (p < 0.001). Use of SLNB was associated with subsequent mastectomy but not radiotherapy. Multivariate analyses of the matched sample showed that, compared with no SLNB, SLNB use was significantly associated with incidence of any complication [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.39; 99% confidence interval (CI) 1.18–1.63], lymphedema (AOR 4.45; 99% CI 2.27–8.75), wound infection (AOR 1.24; 99% CI 1.00–1.54), seroma (AOR 1.40; 99% CI 1.03–1.91), and pain (AOR 1.31; 99% CI 1.04–1.65). Sensitivity analyses excluding patients who underwent mastectomy yielded qualitatively similar results regarding the associations between SLNB and complications. CONCLUSIONS: Among older women with DCIS who received BCS, SLNB use was associated with higher risks of short-term complications. These findings support consensus guidelines recommending against SLNB for this population and provide empirical information for patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-018-6410-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5928184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59281842018-05-09 Associations Between Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Complications for Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Killelea, Brigid K. Long, Jessica B. Dang, Weixiong Mougalian, Sarah S. Evans, Suzanne B. Gross, Cary P. Wang, Shi-Yi Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology PURPOSE: To examine the associations between sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and complications among older patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: We identified women from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare dataset aged 67–94 years diagnosed during 1998–2011 with DCIS who underwent BCS as initial treatment. We assessed incidence of complications, including lymphedema, wound infection, seroma, or pain, within 9 months of diagnosis. We used Mahalanobis matching and generalized linear models to estimate the associations between SLNB and complications. RESULTS: Our sample consisted of 15,515 beneficiaries, 2409 (15.5%) of whom received SLNB. Overall, 16.8% of women who received SLNB had complications, compared with 11.3% of women who did not receive SLNB (p < 0.001). Use of SLNB was associated with subsequent mastectomy but not radiotherapy. Multivariate analyses of the matched sample showed that, compared with no SLNB, SLNB use was significantly associated with incidence of any complication [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.39; 99% confidence interval (CI) 1.18–1.63], lymphedema (AOR 4.45; 99% CI 2.27–8.75), wound infection (AOR 1.24; 99% CI 1.00–1.54), seroma (AOR 1.40; 99% CI 1.03–1.91), and pain (AOR 1.31; 99% CI 1.04–1.65). Sensitivity analyses excluding patients who underwent mastectomy yielded qualitatively similar results regarding the associations between SLNB and complications. CONCLUSIONS: Among older women with DCIS who received BCS, SLNB use was associated with higher risks of short-term complications. These findings support consensus guidelines recommending against SLNB for this population and provide empirical information for patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-018-6410-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-03-07 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5928184/ /pubmed/29516364 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6410-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Breast Oncology
Killelea, Brigid K.
Long, Jessica B.
Dang, Weixiong
Mougalian, Sarah S.
Evans, Suzanne B.
Gross, Cary P.
Wang, Shi-Yi
Associations Between Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Complications for Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title Associations Between Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Complications for Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_full Associations Between Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Complications for Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_fullStr Associations Between Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Complications for Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_full_unstemmed Associations Between Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Complications for Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_short Associations Between Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Complications for Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
title_sort associations between sentinel lymph node biopsy and complications for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ
topic Breast Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29516364
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6410-0
work_keys_str_mv AT killeleabrigidk associationsbetweensentinellymphnodebiopsyandcomplicationsforpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitu
AT longjessicab associationsbetweensentinellymphnodebiopsyandcomplicationsforpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitu
AT dangweixiong associationsbetweensentinellymphnodebiopsyandcomplicationsforpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitu
AT mougaliansarahs associationsbetweensentinellymphnodebiopsyandcomplicationsforpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitu
AT evanssuzanneb associationsbetweensentinellymphnodebiopsyandcomplicationsforpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitu
AT grosscaryp associationsbetweensentinellymphnodebiopsyandcomplicationsforpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitu
AT wangshiyi associationsbetweensentinellymphnodebiopsyandcomplicationsforpatientswithductalcarcinomainsitu