Cargando…

Comparison and Evaluation of Different Treatment Plans with IFRT Field and 6 and 18 MV Energies in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Involvement Neck and Mediastinum

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy with large mantle field is an effective technique in increasing the risk of secondary cancers among HL (Hodgkin Lymphoma) patients; therefore, it is essential to choose an effective treatment field including the least medical conditions in radiotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The presen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tavakoli, M.B., Maleki, M., Akhavan, A., Hadisinia, T., Abedi, I., Amouheidari, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732341
_version_ 1783319218256609280
author Tavakoli, M.B.
Maleki, M.
Akhavan, A.
Hadisinia, T.
Abedi, I.
Amouheidari, A.
author_facet Tavakoli, M.B.
Maleki, M.
Akhavan, A.
Hadisinia, T.
Abedi, I.
Amouheidari, A.
author_sort Tavakoli, M.B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy with large mantle field is an effective technique in increasing the risk of secondary cancers among HL (Hodgkin Lymphoma) patients; therefore, it is essential to choose an effective treatment field including the least medical conditions in radiotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to plan separate fields for neck and mediastinum using various energies, to compare dose distribution with MLC and to block field formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 3D conformal treatments, Siemens Oncor accelerator equipped with multi-leaf collimator (MLC) were performed to create anterior-posterior fields. CT-scan data of 18 female patients with neck and mediastinal involvement was imported in TIGRT treatment planning system, and then treatment plans were introduced. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Using treatment plan 1, photon 6 MV in neck weighting 1 from interior, 0.5 from posterior, photon 18MV in mediastinum weighting 1 from interior and 0.5 from posterior, it was shown that regarding the common treatment plan used with photon 6 MV, mean dose delivered to breast, lung, esophagus and larynx reduced 6, 7, 41 and 10 percent, respectively and uniformity index improved by 10 percent. Using block compared to MLC in all treatment plans offered improved average dose in all organs under study. To protect breast and lung while using MLC and block in the first treatment plan seemed to be more appropriate; however, using blocks in comparison to MLC increased delivered mean dose in all organs under study. Using separate fields with Pb blocks, though, showed smaller increase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5928312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59283122018-05-04 Comparison and Evaluation of Different Treatment Plans with IFRT Field and 6 and 18 MV Energies in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Involvement Neck and Mediastinum Tavakoli, M.B. Maleki, M. Akhavan, A. Hadisinia, T. Abedi, I. Amouheidari, A. J Biomed Phys Eng Original Article BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy with large mantle field is an effective technique in increasing the risk of secondary cancers among HL (Hodgkin Lymphoma) patients; therefore, it is essential to choose an effective treatment field including the least medical conditions in radiotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to plan separate fields for neck and mediastinum using various energies, to compare dose distribution with MLC and to block field formation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, 3D conformal treatments, Siemens Oncor accelerator equipped with multi-leaf collimator (MLC) were performed to create anterior-posterior fields. CT-scan data of 18 female patients with neck and mediastinal involvement was imported in TIGRT treatment planning system, and then treatment plans were introduced. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Using treatment plan 1, photon 6 MV in neck weighting 1 from interior, 0.5 from posterior, photon 18MV in mediastinum weighting 1 from interior and 0.5 from posterior, it was shown that regarding the common treatment plan used with photon 6 MV, mean dose delivered to breast, lung, esophagus and larynx reduced 6, 7, 41 and 10 percent, respectively and uniformity index improved by 10 percent. Using block compared to MLC in all treatment plans offered improved average dose in all organs under study. To protect breast and lung while using MLC and block in the first treatment plan seemed to be more appropriate; however, using blocks in comparison to MLC increased delivered mean dose in all organs under study. Using separate fields with Pb blocks, though, showed smaller increase. Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering 2018-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5928312/ /pubmed/29732341 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Biomedical Physics and Engineering http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Tavakoli, M.B.
Maleki, M.
Akhavan, A.
Hadisinia, T.
Abedi, I.
Amouheidari, A.
Comparison and Evaluation of Different Treatment Plans with IFRT Field and 6 and 18 MV Energies in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Involvement Neck and Mediastinum
title Comparison and Evaluation of Different Treatment Plans with IFRT Field and 6 and 18 MV Energies in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Involvement Neck and Mediastinum
title_full Comparison and Evaluation of Different Treatment Plans with IFRT Field and 6 and 18 MV Energies in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Involvement Neck and Mediastinum
title_fullStr Comparison and Evaluation of Different Treatment Plans with IFRT Field and 6 and 18 MV Energies in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Involvement Neck and Mediastinum
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and Evaluation of Different Treatment Plans with IFRT Field and 6 and 18 MV Energies in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Involvement Neck and Mediastinum
title_short Comparison and Evaluation of Different Treatment Plans with IFRT Field and 6 and 18 MV Energies in Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Involvement Neck and Mediastinum
title_sort comparison and evaluation of different treatment plans with ifrt field and 6 and 18 mv energies in hodgkin’s lymphoma involvement neck and mediastinum
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732341
work_keys_str_mv AT tavakolimb comparisonandevaluationofdifferenttreatmentplanswithifrtfieldand6and18mvenergiesinhodgkinslymphomainvolvementneckandmediastinum
AT malekim comparisonandevaluationofdifferenttreatmentplanswithifrtfieldand6and18mvenergiesinhodgkinslymphomainvolvementneckandmediastinum
AT akhavana comparisonandevaluationofdifferenttreatmentplanswithifrtfieldand6and18mvenergiesinhodgkinslymphomainvolvementneckandmediastinum
AT hadisiniat comparisonandevaluationofdifferenttreatmentplanswithifrtfieldand6and18mvenergiesinhodgkinslymphomainvolvementneckandmediastinum
AT abedii comparisonandevaluationofdifferenttreatmentplanswithifrtfieldand6and18mvenergiesinhodgkinslymphomainvolvementneckandmediastinum
AT amouheidaria comparisonandevaluationofdifferenttreatmentplanswithifrtfieldand6and18mvenergiesinhodgkinslymphomainvolvementneckandmediastinum