Cargando…
Failure to Recover Major Events of Gene Flux in Real Biological Data Due to Method Misapplication
In prokaryotes, known mechanisms of lateral gene transfer (transformation, transduction, conjugation, and gene transfer agents) generate new combinations of genes among chromosomes during evolution. In eukaryotes, whose host lineage is descended from archaea, lateral gene transfer from organelles to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29718211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy080 |
_version_ | 1783319239240712192 |
---|---|
author | Kapust, Nils Nelson-Sathi, Shijulal Schönfeld, Barbara Hazkani-Covo, Einat Bryant, David Lockhart, Peter J Röttger, Mayo Xavier, Joana C Martin, William F |
author_facet | Kapust, Nils Nelson-Sathi, Shijulal Schönfeld, Barbara Hazkani-Covo, Einat Bryant, David Lockhart, Peter J Röttger, Mayo Xavier, Joana C Martin, William F |
author_sort | Kapust, Nils |
collection | PubMed |
description | In prokaryotes, known mechanisms of lateral gene transfer (transformation, transduction, conjugation, and gene transfer agents) generate new combinations of genes among chromosomes during evolution. In eukaryotes, whose host lineage is descended from archaea, lateral gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus occurs at endosymbiotic events. Recent genome analyses studying gene distributions have uncovered evidence for sporadic, discontinuous events of gene transfer from bacteria to archaea during evolution. Other studies have used traditional models designed to investigate gene family size evolution (Count) to support claims that gene transfer to archaea was continuous during evolution, rather than involving occasional periodic mass gene influx events. Here, we show that the methodology used in analyses favoring continuous gene transfers to archaea was misapplied in other studies and does not recover known events of single simultaneous origin for many genes followed by differential loss in real data: plastid genomes. Using the same software and the same settings, we reanalyzed presence/absence pattern data for proteins encoded in plastid genomes and for eukaryotic protein families acquired from plastids. Contrary to expectations under a plastid origin model, we found that the methodology employed inferred that gene acquisitions occurred uniformly across the plant tree. Sometimes as many as nine different acquisitions by plastid DNA were inferred for the same protein family. That is, the methodology that recovered gradual and continuous lateral gene transfer among lineages for archaea obtains the same result for plastids, even though it is known that massive gains followed by gradual differential loss is the true evolutionary process that generated plastid gene distribution data. Our findings caution against the use of models designed to study gene family size evolution for investigating gene transfer processes, especially when transfers involving more than one gene per event are possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5928405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59284052018-05-04 Failure to Recover Major Events of Gene Flux in Real Biological Data Due to Method Misapplication Kapust, Nils Nelson-Sathi, Shijulal Schönfeld, Barbara Hazkani-Covo, Einat Bryant, David Lockhart, Peter J Röttger, Mayo Xavier, Joana C Martin, William F Genome Biol Evol Research Article In prokaryotes, known mechanisms of lateral gene transfer (transformation, transduction, conjugation, and gene transfer agents) generate new combinations of genes among chromosomes during evolution. In eukaryotes, whose host lineage is descended from archaea, lateral gene transfer from organelles to the nucleus occurs at endosymbiotic events. Recent genome analyses studying gene distributions have uncovered evidence for sporadic, discontinuous events of gene transfer from bacteria to archaea during evolution. Other studies have used traditional models designed to investigate gene family size evolution (Count) to support claims that gene transfer to archaea was continuous during evolution, rather than involving occasional periodic mass gene influx events. Here, we show that the methodology used in analyses favoring continuous gene transfers to archaea was misapplied in other studies and does not recover known events of single simultaneous origin for many genes followed by differential loss in real data: plastid genomes. Using the same software and the same settings, we reanalyzed presence/absence pattern data for proteins encoded in plastid genomes and for eukaryotic protein families acquired from plastids. Contrary to expectations under a plastid origin model, we found that the methodology employed inferred that gene acquisitions occurred uniformly across the plant tree. Sometimes as many as nine different acquisitions by plastid DNA were inferred for the same protein family. That is, the methodology that recovered gradual and continuous lateral gene transfer among lineages for archaea obtains the same result for plastids, even though it is known that massive gains followed by gradual differential loss is the true evolutionary process that generated plastid gene distribution data. Our findings caution against the use of models designed to study gene family size evolution for investigating gene transfer processes, especially when transfers involving more than one gene per event are possible. Oxford University Press 2018-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5928405/ /pubmed/29718211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy080 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kapust, Nils Nelson-Sathi, Shijulal Schönfeld, Barbara Hazkani-Covo, Einat Bryant, David Lockhart, Peter J Röttger, Mayo Xavier, Joana C Martin, William F Failure to Recover Major Events of Gene Flux in Real Biological Data Due to Method Misapplication |
title | Failure to Recover Major Events of Gene Flux in Real Biological Data Due to Method Misapplication |
title_full | Failure to Recover Major Events of Gene Flux in Real Biological Data Due to Method Misapplication |
title_fullStr | Failure to Recover Major Events of Gene Flux in Real Biological Data Due to Method Misapplication |
title_full_unstemmed | Failure to Recover Major Events of Gene Flux in Real Biological Data Due to Method Misapplication |
title_short | Failure to Recover Major Events of Gene Flux in Real Biological Data Due to Method Misapplication |
title_sort | failure to recover major events of gene flux in real biological data due to method misapplication |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29718211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy080 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kapustnils failuretorecovermajoreventsofgenefluxinrealbiologicaldataduetomethodmisapplication AT nelsonsathishijulal failuretorecovermajoreventsofgenefluxinrealbiologicaldataduetomethodmisapplication AT schonfeldbarbara failuretorecovermajoreventsofgenefluxinrealbiologicaldataduetomethodmisapplication AT hazkanicovoeinat failuretorecovermajoreventsofgenefluxinrealbiologicaldataduetomethodmisapplication AT bryantdavid failuretorecovermajoreventsofgenefluxinrealbiologicaldataduetomethodmisapplication AT lockhartpeterj failuretorecovermajoreventsofgenefluxinrealbiologicaldataduetomethodmisapplication AT rottgermayo failuretorecovermajoreventsofgenefluxinrealbiologicaldataduetomethodmisapplication AT xavierjoanac failuretorecovermajoreventsofgenefluxinrealbiologicaldataduetomethodmisapplication AT martinwilliamf failuretorecovermajoreventsofgenefluxinrealbiologicaldataduetomethodmisapplication |