Cargando…

Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy

Empathy is crucial for successful interpersonal interactions, and it is impaired in many psychiatric and neurological disorders. Action-perception matching, or action simulation mechanisms, has been suggested to facilitate empathy by supporting the simulation of perceived experience in others. Howev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oliver, Lindsay D, Vieira, Joana B, Neufeld, Richard W J, Dziobek, Isabel, Mitchell, Derek G V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29462481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy013
_version_ 1783319240278802432
author Oliver, Lindsay D
Vieira, Joana B
Neufeld, Richard W J
Dziobek, Isabel
Mitchell, Derek G V
author_facet Oliver, Lindsay D
Vieira, Joana B
Neufeld, Richard W J
Dziobek, Isabel
Mitchell, Derek G V
author_sort Oliver, Lindsay D
collection PubMed
description Empathy is crucial for successful interpersonal interactions, and it is impaired in many psychiatric and neurological disorders. Action-perception matching, or action simulation mechanisms, has been suggested to facilitate empathy by supporting the simulation of perceived experience in others. However, this remains unclear, and the involvement of the action simulation circuit in cognitive empathy (the ability to adopt another’s perspective) vs emotional empathy (the capacity to share and react affectively to another’s emotional experience) has not been quantitatively compared. Presently, healthy adults completed a classic cognitive empathy task (false belief), an emotional empathy task and an action simulation button-pressing task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Conjunction analyses revealed common recruitment of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), thought to be critical for action-perception matching, during both action simulation and emotional, but not cognitive, empathy. Furthermore, activation was significantly greater in action simulation regions in the left IFG during emotional vs cognitive empathy, and activity in this region was positively correlated with mean feeling ratings during the emotional empathy task. These findings provide evidence for greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional than cognitive empathy. Thus, the action simulation circuit may be an important target for delineating the pathophysiology of disorders featuring emotional empathy impairments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5928409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59284092018-05-04 Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy Oliver, Lindsay D Vieira, Joana B Neufeld, Richard W J Dziobek, Isabel Mitchell, Derek G V Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Articles Empathy is crucial for successful interpersonal interactions, and it is impaired in many psychiatric and neurological disorders. Action-perception matching, or action simulation mechanisms, has been suggested to facilitate empathy by supporting the simulation of perceived experience in others. However, this remains unclear, and the involvement of the action simulation circuit in cognitive empathy (the ability to adopt another’s perspective) vs emotional empathy (the capacity to share and react affectively to another’s emotional experience) has not been quantitatively compared. Presently, healthy adults completed a classic cognitive empathy task (false belief), an emotional empathy task and an action simulation button-pressing task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Conjunction analyses revealed common recruitment of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), thought to be critical for action-perception matching, during both action simulation and emotional, but not cognitive, empathy. Furthermore, activation was significantly greater in action simulation regions in the left IFG during emotional vs cognitive empathy, and activity in this region was positively correlated with mean feeling ratings during the emotional empathy task. These findings provide evidence for greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional than cognitive empathy. Thus, the action simulation circuit may be an important target for delineating the pathophysiology of disorders featuring emotional empathy impairments. Oxford University Press 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5928409/ /pubmed/29462481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy013 Text en © The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Oliver, Lindsay D
Vieira, Joana B
Neufeld, Richard W J
Dziobek, Isabel
Mitchell, Derek G V
Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy
title Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy
title_full Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy
title_fullStr Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy
title_full_unstemmed Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy
title_short Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy
title_sort greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29462481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy013
work_keys_str_mv AT oliverlindsayd greaterinvolvementofactionsimulationmechanismsinemotionalvscognitiveempathy
AT vieirajoanab greaterinvolvementofactionsimulationmechanismsinemotionalvscognitiveempathy
AT neufeldrichardwj greaterinvolvementofactionsimulationmechanismsinemotionalvscognitiveempathy
AT dziobekisabel greaterinvolvementofactionsimulationmechanismsinemotionalvscognitiveempathy
AT mitchellderekgv greaterinvolvementofactionsimulationmechanismsinemotionalvscognitiveempathy