Cargando…
Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy
Empathy is crucial for successful interpersonal interactions, and it is impaired in many psychiatric and neurological disorders. Action-perception matching, or action simulation mechanisms, has been suggested to facilitate empathy by supporting the simulation of perceived experience in others. Howev...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29462481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy013 |
_version_ | 1783319240278802432 |
---|---|
author | Oliver, Lindsay D Vieira, Joana B Neufeld, Richard W J Dziobek, Isabel Mitchell, Derek G V |
author_facet | Oliver, Lindsay D Vieira, Joana B Neufeld, Richard W J Dziobek, Isabel Mitchell, Derek G V |
author_sort | Oliver, Lindsay D |
collection | PubMed |
description | Empathy is crucial for successful interpersonal interactions, and it is impaired in many psychiatric and neurological disorders. Action-perception matching, or action simulation mechanisms, has been suggested to facilitate empathy by supporting the simulation of perceived experience in others. However, this remains unclear, and the involvement of the action simulation circuit in cognitive empathy (the ability to adopt another’s perspective) vs emotional empathy (the capacity to share and react affectively to another’s emotional experience) has not been quantitatively compared. Presently, healthy adults completed a classic cognitive empathy task (false belief), an emotional empathy task and an action simulation button-pressing task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Conjunction analyses revealed common recruitment of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), thought to be critical for action-perception matching, during both action simulation and emotional, but not cognitive, empathy. Furthermore, activation was significantly greater in action simulation regions in the left IFG during emotional vs cognitive empathy, and activity in this region was positively correlated with mean feeling ratings during the emotional empathy task. These findings provide evidence for greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional than cognitive empathy. Thus, the action simulation circuit may be an important target for delineating the pathophysiology of disorders featuring emotional empathy impairments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5928409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59284092018-05-04 Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy Oliver, Lindsay D Vieira, Joana B Neufeld, Richard W J Dziobek, Isabel Mitchell, Derek G V Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Articles Empathy is crucial for successful interpersonal interactions, and it is impaired in many psychiatric and neurological disorders. Action-perception matching, or action simulation mechanisms, has been suggested to facilitate empathy by supporting the simulation of perceived experience in others. However, this remains unclear, and the involvement of the action simulation circuit in cognitive empathy (the ability to adopt another’s perspective) vs emotional empathy (the capacity to share and react affectively to another’s emotional experience) has not been quantitatively compared. Presently, healthy adults completed a classic cognitive empathy task (false belief), an emotional empathy task and an action simulation button-pressing task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Conjunction analyses revealed common recruitment of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), thought to be critical for action-perception matching, during both action simulation and emotional, but not cognitive, empathy. Furthermore, activation was significantly greater in action simulation regions in the left IFG during emotional vs cognitive empathy, and activity in this region was positively correlated with mean feeling ratings during the emotional empathy task. These findings provide evidence for greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional than cognitive empathy. Thus, the action simulation circuit may be an important target for delineating the pathophysiology of disorders featuring emotional empathy impairments. Oxford University Press 2018-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5928409/ /pubmed/29462481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy013 Text en © The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Oliver, Lindsay D Vieira, Joana B Neufeld, Richard W J Dziobek, Isabel Mitchell, Derek G V Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy |
title | Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy |
title_full | Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy |
title_fullStr | Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy |
title_full_unstemmed | Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy |
title_short | Greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy |
title_sort | greater involvement of action simulation mechanisms in emotional vs cognitive empathy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29462481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oliverlindsayd greaterinvolvementofactionsimulationmechanismsinemotionalvscognitiveempathy AT vieirajoanab greaterinvolvementofactionsimulationmechanismsinemotionalvscognitiveempathy AT neufeldrichardwj greaterinvolvementofactionsimulationmechanismsinemotionalvscognitiveempathy AT dziobekisabel greaterinvolvementofactionsimulationmechanismsinemotionalvscognitiveempathy AT mitchellderekgv greaterinvolvementofactionsimulationmechanismsinemotionalvscognitiveempathy |