Cargando…

Two Inexpensive and Non-destructive Techniques to Correct for Smaller-Than-Gasket Leaf Area in Gas Exchange Measurements

The development of technology, like the widely-used off-the-shelf portable photosynthesis systems, for the quantification of leaf gas exchange rates and chlorophyll fluorescence offered photosynthesis research a massive boost. Gas exchange parameters in such photosynthesis systems are calculated as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Savvides, Andreas M., Fotopoulos, Vasileios
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29740471
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00548
_version_ 1783319248201842688
author Savvides, Andreas M.
Fotopoulos, Vasileios
author_facet Savvides, Andreas M.
Fotopoulos, Vasileios
author_sort Savvides, Andreas M.
collection PubMed
description The development of technology, like the widely-used off-the-shelf portable photosynthesis systems, for the quantification of leaf gas exchange rates and chlorophyll fluorescence offered photosynthesis research a massive boost. Gas exchange parameters in such photosynthesis systems are calculated as gas exchange rates per unit leaf area. In small chambers (<10 cm(2)), the leaf area used by the system for these calculations is actually the internal gasket area (A(G)), provided that the leaf covers the entire A(G). In this study, we present two inexpensive and non-destructive techniques that can be used to easily quantify the enclosed leaf area (A(L)) of plant species with leaves of surface area much smaller than the A(G), such as that of cereal crops. The A(L) of the cereal crop species studied has been measured using a standard image-based approach (iA(L)) and estimated using a leaf width-based approach (wA(L)). iA(L) and wA(L) did not show any significant differences between them in maize, barley, hard and soft wheat. Similar results were obtained when the wA(L) was tested in comparison with iA(L) in different positions along the leaf in all species studied. The quantification of A(L) and the subsequent correction of leaf gas exchange parameters for A(L) provided a precise quantification of net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance especially with decreasing A(L). This study provides two practical, inexpensive and non-destructive solutions to researchers dealing with photosynthesis measurements on small-leaf plant species. The image-based technique can be widely used for quantifying A(L) in many plant species despite their leaf shape. The leaf width-based technique can be securely used for quantifying A(L) in cereal crop species such as maize, wheat and barley along the leaf. Both techniques can be used for a wide range of gasket shapes and sizes with minor technique-specific adjustments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5928467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59284672018-05-08 Two Inexpensive and Non-destructive Techniques to Correct for Smaller-Than-Gasket Leaf Area in Gas Exchange Measurements Savvides, Andreas M. Fotopoulos, Vasileios Front Plant Sci Plant Science The development of technology, like the widely-used off-the-shelf portable photosynthesis systems, for the quantification of leaf gas exchange rates and chlorophyll fluorescence offered photosynthesis research a massive boost. Gas exchange parameters in such photosynthesis systems are calculated as gas exchange rates per unit leaf area. In small chambers (<10 cm(2)), the leaf area used by the system for these calculations is actually the internal gasket area (A(G)), provided that the leaf covers the entire A(G). In this study, we present two inexpensive and non-destructive techniques that can be used to easily quantify the enclosed leaf area (A(L)) of plant species with leaves of surface area much smaller than the A(G), such as that of cereal crops. The A(L) of the cereal crop species studied has been measured using a standard image-based approach (iA(L)) and estimated using a leaf width-based approach (wA(L)). iA(L) and wA(L) did not show any significant differences between them in maize, barley, hard and soft wheat. Similar results were obtained when the wA(L) was tested in comparison with iA(L) in different positions along the leaf in all species studied. The quantification of A(L) and the subsequent correction of leaf gas exchange parameters for A(L) provided a precise quantification of net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance especially with decreasing A(L). This study provides two practical, inexpensive and non-destructive solutions to researchers dealing with photosynthesis measurements on small-leaf plant species. The image-based technique can be widely used for quantifying A(L) in many plant species despite their leaf shape. The leaf width-based technique can be securely used for quantifying A(L) in cereal crop species such as maize, wheat and barley along the leaf. Both techniques can be used for a wide range of gasket shapes and sizes with minor technique-specific adjustments. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5928467/ /pubmed/29740471 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00548 Text en Copyright © 2018 Savvides and Fotopoulos. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Savvides, Andreas M.
Fotopoulos, Vasileios
Two Inexpensive and Non-destructive Techniques to Correct for Smaller-Than-Gasket Leaf Area in Gas Exchange Measurements
title Two Inexpensive and Non-destructive Techniques to Correct for Smaller-Than-Gasket Leaf Area in Gas Exchange Measurements
title_full Two Inexpensive and Non-destructive Techniques to Correct for Smaller-Than-Gasket Leaf Area in Gas Exchange Measurements
title_fullStr Two Inexpensive and Non-destructive Techniques to Correct for Smaller-Than-Gasket Leaf Area in Gas Exchange Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Two Inexpensive and Non-destructive Techniques to Correct for Smaller-Than-Gasket Leaf Area in Gas Exchange Measurements
title_short Two Inexpensive and Non-destructive Techniques to Correct for Smaller-Than-Gasket Leaf Area in Gas Exchange Measurements
title_sort two inexpensive and non-destructive techniques to correct for smaller-than-gasket leaf area in gas exchange measurements
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29740471
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00548
work_keys_str_mv AT savvidesandreasm twoinexpensiveandnondestructivetechniquestocorrectforsmallerthangasketleafareaingasexchangemeasurements
AT fotopoulosvasileios twoinexpensiveandnondestructivetechniquestocorrectforsmallerthangasketleafareaingasexchangemeasurements