Cargando…
Push-out bond strength of intra-orifice barrier materials: Bulk-fill composite versus calcium silicate cement
Background. The aim of this study was to compare the push-out bond strengths of calcium silicate-based ProRoot MTA and Biodentine cements and SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior bulk-fill composite resins. Methods. Twenty-four single-rooted maxillary central incisors were sectioned below the cementoenam...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732015 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.002 |
_version_ | 1783319250298994688 |
---|---|
author | Özyurek, Taha Uslu, Gülşah Yilmaz, Koray |
author_facet | Özyurek, Taha Uslu, Gülşah Yilmaz, Koray |
author_sort | Özyurek, Taha |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The aim of this study was to compare the push-out bond strengths of calcium silicate-based ProRoot MTA and Biodentine cements and SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior bulk-fill composite resins. Methods. Twenty-four single-rooted maxillary central incisors were sectioned below the cementoenamel junction, and the root canals were instrumented using rotary files. Thereafter, a parallel post drill was used to obtain a standardized root canal dimension. The roots were randomly assigned to one of the following groups with respect to the intra-orifice barrier used: ProRoot MTA; Biodentine; SureFil SDR; EverX Posterior. Five 1-mm-thick sections were obtained from the coronal aspect of each root. Push-out bond strength testing was performed and data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc Dunn tests (P<0.05). Results. SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior bulk-fill composite resins’ bond strengths were significantly higher than ProRoot MTA and Biodentine calcium silicate cements. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between bulk-fill composite resins values and calcium silicate cement values. Conclusion. Within the limitations of present study, calcium silicate-based ProRoot MTA cement’s push-out bond strength was lower than those of Biodentine, SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior materials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5928476 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59284762018-05-04 Push-out bond strength of intra-orifice barrier materials: Bulk-fill composite versus calcium silicate cement Özyurek, Taha Uslu, Gülşah Yilmaz, Koray J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. The aim of this study was to compare the push-out bond strengths of calcium silicate-based ProRoot MTA and Biodentine cements and SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior bulk-fill composite resins. Methods. Twenty-four single-rooted maxillary central incisors were sectioned below the cementoenamel junction, and the root canals were instrumented using rotary files. Thereafter, a parallel post drill was used to obtain a standardized root canal dimension. The roots were randomly assigned to one of the following groups with respect to the intra-orifice barrier used: ProRoot MTA; Biodentine; SureFil SDR; EverX Posterior. Five 1-mm-thick sections were obtained from the coronal aspect of each root. Push-out bond strength testing was performed and data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc Dunn tests (P<0.05). Results. SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior bulk-fill composite resins’ bond strengths were significantly higher than ProRoot MTA and Biodentine calcium silicate cements. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between bulk-fill composite resins values and calcium silicate cement values. Conclusion. Within the limitations of present study, calcium silicate-based ProRoot MTA cement’s push-out bond strength was lower than those of Biodentine, SureFil SDR and EverX Posterior materials. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018 2018-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5928476/ /pubmed/29732015 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.002 Text en © 2018 Özyürek et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article published and distributed by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Özyurek, Taha Uslu, Gülşah Yilmaz, Koray Push-out bond strength of intra-orifice barrier materials: Bulk-fill composite versus calcium silicate cement |
title | Push-out bond strength of intra-orifice barrier materials: Bulk-fill composite versus calcium silicate cement |
title_full | Push-out bond strength of intra-orifice barrier materials: Bulk-fill composite versus calcium silicate cement |
title_fullStr | Push-out bond strength of intra-orifice barrier materials: Bulk-fill composite versus calcium silicate cement |
title_full_unstemmed | Push-out bond strength of intra-orifice barrier materials: Bulk-fill composite versus calcium silicate cement |
title_short | Push-out bond strength of intra-orifice barrier materials: Bulk-fill composite versus calcium silicate cement |
title_sort | push-out bond strength of intra-orifice barrier materials: bulk-fill composite versus calcium silicate cement |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732015 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozyurektaha pushoutbondstrengthofintraorificebarriermaterialsbulkfillcompositeversuscalciumsilicatecement AT uslugulsah pushoutbondstrengthofintraorificebarriermaterialsbulkfillcompositeversuscalciumsilicatecement AT yilmazkoray pushoutbondstrengthofintraorificebarriermaterialsbulkfillcompositeversuscalciumsilicatecement |