Cargando…
Am I Self-Conscious? (Or Does Self-Organization Entail Self-Consciousness?)
Is self-consciousness necessary for consciousness? The answer is yes. So there you have it—the answer is yes. This was my response to a question I was asked to address in a recent AEON piece (https://aeon.co/essays/consciousness-is-not-a-thing-but-a-process-of-inference). What follows is based upon...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29740369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00579 |
_version_ | 1783319297128398848 |
---|---|
author | Friston, Karl |
author_facet | Friston, Karl |
author_sort | Friston, Karl |
collection | PubMed |
description | Is self-consciousness necessary for consciousness? The answer is yes. So there you have it—the answer is yes. This was my response to a question I was asked to address in a recent AEON piece (https://aeon.co/essays/consciousness-is-not-a-thing-but-a-process-of-inference). What follows is based upon the notes for that essay, with a special focus on self-organization, self-evidencing and self-modeling. I will try to substantiate my (polemic) answer from the perspective of a physicist. In brief, the argument goes as follows: if we want to talk about creatures, like ourselves, then we have to identify the characteristic behaviors they must exhibit. This is fairly easy to do by noting that living systems return to a set of attracting states time and time again. Mathematically, this implies the existence of a Lyapunov function that turns out to be model evidence (i.e., self-evidence) in Bayesian statistics or surprise (i.e., self-information) in information theory. This means that all biological processes can be construed as performing some form of inference, from evolution through to conscious processing. If this is the case, at what point do we invoke consciousness? The proposal on offer here is that the mind comes into being when self-evidencing has a temporal thickness or counterfactual depth, which grounds inferences about the consequences of my action. On this view, consciousness is nothing more than inference about my future; namely, the self-evidencing consequences of what I could do. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5928749 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59287492018-05-08 Am I Self-Conscious? (Or Does Self-Organization Entail Self-Consciousness?) Friston, Karl Front Psychol Psychology Is self-consciousness necessary for consciousness? The answer is yes. So there you have it—the answer is yes. This was my response to a question I was asked to address in a recent AEON piece (https://aeon.co/essays/consciousness-is-not-a-thing-but-a-process-of-inference). What follows is based upon the notes for that essay, with a special focus on self-organization, self-evidencing and self-modeling. I will try to substantiate my (polemic) answer from the perspective of a physicist. In brief, the argument goes as follows: if we want to talk about creatures, like ourselves, then we have to identify the characteristic behaviors they must exhibit. This is fairly easy to do by noting that living systems return to a set of attracting states time and time again. Mathematically, this implies the existence of a Lyapunov function that turns out to be model evidence (i.e., self-evidence) in Bayesian statistics or surprise (i.e., self-information) in information theory. This means that all biological processes can be construed as performing some form of inference, from evolution through to conscious processing. If this is the case, at what point do we invoke consciousness? The proposal on offer here is that the mind comes into being when self-evidencing has a temporal thickness or counterfactual depth, which grounds inferences about the consequences of my action. On this view, consciousness is nothing more than inference about my future; namely, the self-evidencing consequences of what I could do. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5928749/ /pubmed/29740369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00579 Text en Copyright © 2018 Friston. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Friston, Karl Am I Self-Conscious? (Or Does Self-Organization Entail Self-Consciousness?) |
title | Am I Self-Conscious? (Or Does Self-Organization Entail Self-Consciousness?) |
title_full | Am I Self-Conscious? (Or Does Self-Organization Entail Self-Consciousness?) |
title_fullStr | Am I Self-Conscious? (Or Does Self-Organization Entail Self-Consciousness?) |
title_full_unstemmed | Am I Self-Conscious? (Or Does Self-Organization Entail Self-Consciousness?) |
title_short | Am I Self-Conscious? (Or Does Self-Organization Entail Self-Consciousness?) |
title_sort | am i self-conscious? (or does self-organization entail self-consciousness?) |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5928749/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29740369 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fristonkarl amiselfconsciousordoesselforganizationentailselfconsciousness |