Cargando…
Bladder Cancer Genetic Susceptibility. A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: The variant/gene candidate approach to explore bladder cancer (BC) genetic susceptibility has been applied in many studies with significant findings reported. However, results are not always conclusive due to the lack of replication by subsequent studies. OBJECTIVES: To identify all epid...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
IOS Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5929300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732392 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BLC-170159 |
_version_ | 1783319378019745792 |
---|---|
author | de Maturana, Evangelina López Rava, Marta Anumudu, Chiaka Sáez, Olga Alonso, Dolores Malats, Núria |
author_facet | de Maturana, Evangelina López Rava, Marta Anumudu, Chiaka Sáez, Olga Alonso, Dolores Malats, Núria |
author_sort | de Maturana, Evangelina López |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The variant/gene candidate approach to explore bladder cancer (BC) genetic susceptibility has been applied in many studies with significant findings reported. However, results are not always conclusive due to the lack of replication by subsequent studies. OBJECTIVES: To identify all epidemiological investigations on the genetic associations with BC risk, to quantify the likely magnitude of the associations by applying metaanalysis methodology and to assess whether there is a potential for publication/reporting bias. METHODS: To address our aims, we have catalogued all genetic association studies published in the field of BC risk since 2000. Furthermore, we metaanalysed all polymorphisms with data available from at least three independent case-control studies with subjects of Caucasian origin analyzed under the same mode of inheritance. RESULTS: The characterization of the genetic susceptibility of BC is composed of 28 variants, GWAS contributing most of them. Most of the significant variants associated with BC risk are located in genes belonging to chemical carcinogenesis, DNA repair, and cell cycle pathways. Causal relationship was also provided by functional analysis for GSTM1-null, NAT2-slow, APOBEC-rs1014971, CCNE1-rs8102137, SLC14A1-rs10775480, PSCA-rs2294008, UGT1A-rs1189203, and TP63-rs35592567. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic susceptibility of BC is still poorly defined, with GWAS contributing most of the strongest evidence. The systematic review did not provide evidence of further genetic associations. The potential public health translation of the existing knowledge on genetic susceptibility on BC is still limited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5929300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | IOS Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59293002018-05-03 Bladder Cancer Genetic Susceptibility. A Systematic Review de Maturana, Evangelina López Rava, Marta Anumudu, Chiaka Sáez, Olga Alonso, Dolores Malats, Núria Bladder Cancer Research Report BACKGROUND: The variant/gene candidate approach to explore bladder cancer (BC) genetic susceptibility has been applied in many studies with significant findings reported. However, results are not always conclusive due to the lack of replication by subsequent studies. OBJECTIVES: To identify all epidemiological investigations on the genetic associations with BC risk, to quantify the likely magnitude of the associations by applying metaanalysis methodology and to assess whether there is a potential for publication/reporting bias. METHODS: To address our aims, we have catalogued all genetic association studies published in the field of BC risk since 2000. Furthermore, we metaanalysed all polymorphisms with data available from at least three independent case-control studies with subjects of Caucasian origin analyzed under the same mode of inheritance. RESULTS: The characterization of the genetic susceptibility of BC is composed of 28 variants, GWAS contributing most of them. Most of the significant variants associated with BC risk are located in genes belonging to chemical carcinogenesis, DNA repair, and cell cycle pathways. Causal relationship was also provided by functional analysis for GSTM1-null, NAT2-slow, APOBEC-rs1014971, CCNE1-rs8102137, SLC14A1-rs10775480, PSCA-rs2294008, UGT1A-rs1189203, and TP63-rs35592567. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic susceptibility of BC is still poorly defined, with GWAS contributing most of the strongest evidence. The systematic review did not provide evidence of further genetic associations. The potential public health translation of the existing knowledge on genetic susceptibility on BC is still limited. IOS Press 2018-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5929300/ /pubmed/29732392 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BLC-170159 Text en © 2018 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Report de Maturana, Evangelina López Rava, Marta Anumudu, Chiaka Sáez, Olga Alonso, Dolores Malats, Núria Bladder Cancer Genetic Susceptibility. A Systematic Review |
title | Bladder Cancer Genetic Susceptibility. A Systematic Review |
title_full | Bladder Cancer Genetic Susceptibility. A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Bladder Cancer Genetic Susceptibility. A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Bladder Cancer Genetic Susceptibility. A Systematic Review |
title_short | Bladder Cancer Genetic Susceptibility. A Systematic Review |
title_sort | bladder cancer genetic susceptibility. a systematic review |
topic | Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5929300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732392 http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/BLC-170159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dematuranaevangelinalopez bladdercancergeneticsusceptibilityasystematicreview AT ravamarta bladdercancergeneticsusceptibilityasystematicreview AT anumuduchiaka bladdercancergeneticsusceptibilityasystematicreview AT saezolga bladdercancergeneticsusceptibilityasystematicreview AT alonsodolores bladdercancergeneticsusceptibilityasystematicreview AT malatsnuria bladdercancergeneticsusceptibilityasystematicreview |