Cargando…

On what basis are medical cost-effectiveness thresholds set? Clashing opinions and an absence of data: a systematic review

Background: The amount a government should be willing to invest in adopting new medical treatments has long been under debate. With many countries using formal cost-effectiveness (C/E) thresholds when examining potential new treatments and ever-growing medical costs, accurately setting the level of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cameron, David, Ubels, Jasper, Norström, Fredrik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29564962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1447828
_version_ 1783319483138441216
author Cameron, David
Ubels, Jasper
Norström, Fredrik
author_facet Cameron, David
Ubels, Jasper
Norström, Fredrik
author_sort Cameron, David
collection PubMed
description Background: The amount a government should be willing to invest in adopting new medical treatments has long been under debate. With many countries using formal cost-effectiveness (C/E) thresholds when examining potential new treatments and ever-growing medical costs, accurately setting the level of a C/E threshold can be essential for an efficient healthcare system. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to describe the prominent approaches to setting a C/E threshold, compile available national-level C/E threshold data and willingness-to-pay (WTP) data, and to discern whether associations exist between these values, gross domestic product (GDP) and health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE). This review further examines current obstacles faced with the presently available data. Methods: A systematic review was performed to collect articles which have studied national C/E thresholds and willingness-to-pay (WTP) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in the general population. Associations between GDP, HALE, WTP, and C/E thresholds were analyzed with correlations. Results: Seventeen countries were identified from nine unique sources to have formal C/E thresholds within our inclusion criteria. Thirteen countries from nine sources were identified to have WTP per QALY data within our inclusion criteria. Two possible associations were identified: C/E thresholds with HALE (quadratic correlation of 0.63), and C/E thresholds with GDP per capita (polynomial correlation of 0.84). However, these results are based on few observations and therefore firm conclusions cannot be made. Conclusions: Most national C/E thresholds identified in our review fall within the WHO’s recommended range of one-to-three times GDP per capita. However, the quality and quantity of data available regarding national average WTP per QALY, opportunity costs, and C/E thresholds is poor in comparison to the importance of adequate investment in healthcare. There exists an obvious risk that countries might either over- or underinvest in healthcare if they base their decision-making process on erroneous presumptions or non-evidence-based methodologies. The commonly referred to value of 100,000$ USD per QALY may potentially have some basis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5930346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59303462018-05-07 On what basis are medical cost-effectiveness thresholds set? Clashing opinions and an absence of data: a systematic review Cameron, David Ubels, Jasper Norström, Fredrik Glob Health Action Review Article Background: The amount a government should be willing to invest in adopting new medical treatments has long been under debate. With many countries using formal cost-effectiveness (C/E) thresholds when examining potential new treatments and ever-growing medical costs, accurately setting the level of a C/E threshold can be essential for an efficient healthcare system. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to describe the prominent approaches to setting a C/E threshold, compile available national-level C/E threshold data and willingness-to-pay (WTP) data, and to discern whether associations exist between these values, gross domestic product (GDP) and health-adjusted life expectancy (HALE). This review further examines current obstacles faced with the presently available data. Methods: A systematic review was performed to collect articles which have studied national C/E thresholds and willingness-to-pay (WTP) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in the general population. Associations between GDP, HALE, WTP, and C/E thresholds were analyzed with correlations. Results: Seventeen countries were identified from nine unique sources to have formal C/E thresholds within our inclusion criteria. Thirteen countries from nine sources were identified to have WTP per QALY data within our inclusion criteria. Two possible associations were identified: C/E thresholds with HALE (quadratic correlation of 0.63), and C/E thresholds with GDP per capita (polynomial correlation of 0.84). However, these results are based on few observations and therefore firm conclusions cannot be made. Conclusions: Most national C/E thresholds identified in our review fall within the WHO’s recommended range of one-to-three times GDP per capita. However, the quality and quantity of data available regarding national average WTP per QALY, opportunity costs, and C/E thresholds is poor in comparison to the importance of adequate investment in healthcare. There exists an obvious risk that countries might either over- or underinvest in healthcare if they base their decision-making process on erroneous presumptions or non-evidence-based methodologies. The commonly referred to value of 100,000$ USD per QALY may potentially have some basis. Taylor & Francis 2018-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5930346/ /pubmed/29564962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1447828 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Cameron, David
Ubels, Jasper
Norström, Fredrik
On what basis are medical cost-effectiveness thresholds set? Clashing opinions and an absence of data: a systematic review
title On what basis are medical cost-effectiveness thresholds set? Clashing opinions and an absence of data: a systematic review
title_full On what basis are medical cost-effectiveness thresholds set? Clashing opinions and an absence of data: a systematic review
title_fullStr On what basis are medical cost-effectiveness thresholds set? Clashing opinions and an absence of data: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed On what basis are medical cost-effectiveness thresholds set? Clashing opinions and an absence of data: a systematic review
title_short On what basis are medical cost-effectiveness thresholds set? Clashing opinions and an absence of data: a systematic review
title_sort on what basis are medical cost-effectiveness thresholds set? clashing opinions and an absence of data: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29564962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1447828
work_keys_str_mv AT camerondavid onwhatbasisaremedicalcosteffectivenessthresholdssetclashingopinionsandanabsenceofdataasystematicreview
AT ubelsjasper onwhatbasisaremedicalcosteffectivenessthresholdssetclashingopinionsandanabsenceofdataasystematicreview
AT norstromfredrik onwhatbasisaremedicalcosteffectivenessthresholdssetclashingopinionsandanabsenceofdataasystematicreview