Cargando…

The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions

BACKGROUND: Direct to consumer offerings of unproven stem cell interventions (SCIs) is a pressing scientific and policy issue. According to media reports, providers of SCIs have emerged in Canada. This study provides the first systematic scan of Canadian providers and associated trends and claims. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogbogu, Ubaka, Du, Jenny, Koukio, Yonida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0273-6
_version_ 1783319509823651840
author Ogbogu, Ubaka
Du, Jenny
Koukio, Yonida
author_facet Ogbogu, Ubaka
Du, Jenny
Koukio, Yonida
author_sort Ogbogu, Ubaka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Direct to consumer offerings of unproven stem cell interventions (SCIs) is a pressing scientific and policy issue. According to media reports, providers of SCIs have emerged in Canada. This study provides the first systematic scan of Canadian providers and associated trends and claims. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 15 websites retrieved from a Google™ keyword search. The websites were assessed by a rater using a peer-reviewed coding frame that queried treatment location, stem cell offerings, treatment claims, supporting evidence, and legal and regulatory compliance. A second rater reviewed a subset of the websites for purposes of inter-rater reliability. Disagreements between raters were resolved by consensus. Data collected by the raters was analyzed in SPSS. RESULTS: Physicians are the dominant treatment providers in Canada. Providers operate in urban and semi-urban areas in the most populous provinces. SCIs provided are mainly autologous adult stem cells for multiple conditions including musculoskeletal disorders, spinal cord injury (SCI) and diabetes. Efficacy and benefits of treatment are prominently and positively portrayed, while risks are not mentioned or portrayed as trivial. Regulatory concerns are not discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The involvement of physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved SCIs raises significant ethical, legal and regulatory concerns. Treatment claims and trends appear to contravene applicable professional standards, statutory obligations, and consumer protection laws. While the number of providers observed is still marginal, urgent and proactive regulatory response is needed to prevent proliferation of a potentially exploitative and harmful market for unproven SCIs in Canada. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-018-0273-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5930514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59305142018-05-09 The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions Ogbogu, Ubaka Du, Jenny Koukio, Yonida BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Direct to consumer offerings of unproven stem cell interventions (SCIs) is a pressing scientific and policy issue. According to media reports, providers of SCIs have emerged in Canada. This study provides the first systematic scan of Canadian providers and associated trends and claims. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 15 websites retrieved from a Google™ keyword search. The websites were assessed by a rater using a peer-reviewed coding frame that queried treatment location, stem cell offerings, treatment claims, supporting evidence, and legal and regulatory compliance. A second rater reviewed a subset of the websites for purposes of inter-rater reliability. Disagreements between raters were resolved by consensus. Data collected by the raters was analyzed in SPSS. RESULTS: Physicians are the dominant treatment providers in Canada. Providers operate in urban and semi-urban areas in the most populous provinces. SCIs provided are mainly autologous adult stem cells for multiple conditions including musculoskeletal disorders, spinal cord injury (SCI) and diabetes. Efficacy and benefits of treatment are prominently and positively portrayed, while risks are not mentioned or portrayed as trivial. Regulatory concerns are not discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The involvement of physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved SCIs raises significant ethical, legal and regulatory concerns. Treatment claims and trends appear to contravene applicable professional standards, statutory obligations, and consumer protection laws. While the number of providers observed is still marginal, urgent and proactive regulatory response is needed to prevent proliferation of a potentially exploitative and harmful market for unproven SCIs in Canada. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-018-0273-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5930514/ /pubmed/29716594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0273-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ogbogu, Ubaka
Du, Jenny
Koukio, Yonida
The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions
title The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions
title_full The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions
title_fullStr The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions
title_full_unstemmed The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions
title_short The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions
title_sort involvement of canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0273-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ogboguubaka theinvolvementofcanadianphysiciansinpromotingandprovidingunprovenandunapprovedstemcellinterventions
AT dujenny theinvolvementofcanadianphysiciansinpromotingandprovidingunprovenandunapprovedstemcellinterventions
AT koukioyonida theinvolvementofcanadianphysiciansinpromotingandprovidingunprovenandunapprovedstemcellinterventions
AT ogboguubaka involvementofcanadianphysiciansinpromotingandprovidingunprovenandunapprovedstemcellinterventions
AT dujenny involvementofcanadianphysiciansinpromotingandprovidingunprovenandunapprovedstemcellinterventions
AT koukioyonida involvementofcanadianphysiciansinpromotingandprovidingunprovenandunapprovedstemcellinterventions