Cargando…
The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions
BACKGROUND: Direct to consumer offerings of unproven stem cell interventions (SCIs) is a pressing scientific and policy issue. According to media reports, providers of SCIs have emerged in Canada. This study provides the first systematic scan of Canadian providers and associated trends and claims. M...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0273-6 |
_version_ | 1783319509823651840 |
---|---|
author | Ogbogu, Ubaka Du, Jenny Koukio, Yonida |
author_facet | Ogbogu, Ubaka Du, Jenny Koukio, Yonida |
author_sort | Ogbogu, Ubaka |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Direct to consumer offerings of unproven stem cell interventions (SCIs) is a pressing scientific and policy issue. According to media reports, providers of SCIs have emerged in Canada. This study provides the first systematic scan of Canadian providers and associated trends and claims. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 15 websites retrieved from a Google™ keyword search. The websites were assessed by a rater using a peer-reviewed coding frame that queried treatment location, stem cell offerings, treatment claims, supporting evidence, and legal and regulatory compliance. A second rater reviewed a subset of the websites for purposes of inter-rater reliability. Disagreements between raters were resolved by consensus. Data collected by the raters was analyzed in SPSS. RESULTS: Physicians are the dominant treatment providers in Canada. Providers operate in urban and semi-urban areas in the most populous provinces. SCIs provided are mainly autologous adult stem cells for multiple conditions including musculoskeletal disorders, spinal cord injury (SCI) and diabetes. Efficacy and benefits of treatment are prominently and positively portrayed, while risks are not mentioned or portrayed as trivial. Regulatory concerns are not discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The involvement of physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved SCIs raises significant ethical, legal and regulatory concerns. Treatment claims and trends appear to contravene applicable professional standards, statutory obligations, and consumer protection laws. While the number of providers observed is still marginal, urgent and proactive regulatory response is needed to prevent proliferation of a potentially exploitative and harmful market for unproven SCIs in Canada. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-018-0273-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5930514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59305142018-05-09 The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions Ogbogu, Ubaka Du, Jenny Koukio, Yonida BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Direct to consumer offerings of unproven stem cell interventions (SCIs) is a pressing scientific and policy issue. According to media reports, providers of SCIs have emerged in Canada. This study provides the first systematic scan of Canadian providers and associated trends and claims. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 15 websites retrieved from a Google™ keyword search. The websites were assessed by a rater using a peer-reviewed coding frame that queried treatment location, stem cell offerings, treatment claims, supporting evidence, and legal and regulatory compliance. A second rater reviewed a subset of the websites for purposes of inter-rater reliability. Disagreements between raters were resolved by consensus. Data collected by the raters was analyzed in SPSS. RESULTS: Physicians are the dominant treatment providers in Canada. Providers operate in urban and semi-urban areas in the most populous provinces. SCIs provided are mainly autologous adult stem cells for multiple conditions including musculoskeletal disorders, spinal cord injury (SCI) and diabetes. Efficacy and benefits of treatment are prominently and positively portrayed, while risks are not mentioned or portrayed as trivial. Regulatory concerns are not discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The involvement of physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved SCIs raises significant ethical, legal and regulatory concerns. Treatment claims and trends appear to contravene applicable professional standards, statutory obligations, and consumer protection laws. While the number of providers observed is still marginal, urgent and proactive regulatory response is needed to prevent proliferation of a potentially exploitative and harmful market for unproven SCIs in Canada. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12910-018-0273-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5930514/ /pubmed/29716594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0273-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ogbogu, Ubaka Du, Jenny Koukio, Yonida The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions |
title | The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions |
title_full | The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions |
title_fullStr | The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions |
title_short | The involvement of Canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions |
title_sort | involvement of canadian physicians in promoting and providing unproven and unapproved stem cell interventions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-018-0273-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ogboguubaka theinvolvementofcanadianphysiciansinpromotingandprovidingunprovenandunapprovedstemcellinterventions AT dujenny theinvolvementofcanadianphysiciansinpromotingandprovidingunprovenandunapprovedstemcellinterventions AT koukioyonida theinvolvementofcanadianphysiciansinpromotingandprovidingunprovenandunapprovedstemcellinterventions AT ogboguubaka involvementofcanadianphysiciansinpromotingandprovidingunprovenandunapprovedstemcellinterventions AT dujenny involvementofcanadianphysiciansinpromotingandprovidingunprovenandunapprovedstemcellinterventions AT koukioyonida involvementofcanadianphysiciansinpromotingandprovidingunprovenandunapprovedstemcellinterventions |