Cargando…

Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa

BACKGROUND: Suitable and scalable in vitro culture conditions for parasite maintenance are needed to foster drug research for loiasis, one of the neglected tropical diseases which has attracted only limited attention over recent years, despite having important public health impacts. The present work...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zofou, Denis, Fombad, Fanny Fri, Gandjui, Narcisse V. T., Njouendou, Abdel Jelil, Kengne-Ouafo, Arnaud Jonas, Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W., Datchoua-Poutcheu, Fabrice R., Enyong, Peter A., Bita, Dizzle Tayong, Taylor, Mark J., Turner, Joseph D., Wanji, Samuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2852-2
_version_ 1783319519363596288
author Zofou, Denis
Fombad, Fanny Fri
Gandjui, Narcisse V. T.
Njouendou, Abdel Jelil
Kengne-Ouafo, Arnaud Jonas
Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W.
Datchoua-Poutcheu, Fabrice R.
Enyong, Peter A.
Bita, Dizzle Tayong
Taylor, Mark J.
Turner, Joseph D.
Wanji, Samuel
author_facet Zofou, Denis
Fombad, Fanny Fri
Gandjui, Narcisse V. T.
Njouendou, Abdel Jelil
Kengne-Ouafo, Arnaud Jonas
Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W.
Datchoua-Poutcheu, Fabrice R.
Enyong, Peter A.
Bita, Dizzle Tayong
Taylor, Mark J.
Turner, Joseph D.
Wanji, Samuel
author_sort Zofou, Denis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Suitable and scalable in vitro culture conditions for parasite maintenance are needed to foster drug research for loiasis, one of the neglected tropical diseases which has attracted only limited attention over recent years, despite having important public health impacts. The present work aims to develop adequate in vitro culture systems for drug screening against both microfilariae (mf) and infective third-stage larvae (L3) of Loa loa. METHODS: In vitro culture conditions were evaluated by varying three basic culture media: Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640), Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM); four sera/proteins: newborn calf serum (NCS), foetal bovine serum (FBS), bovine serum albumin (BSA) and the lipid-enriched BSA (AlbuMax® II, ALB); and co-culture with the Monkey Kidney Epithelial Cell line (LLC-MK2) as a feeder layer. The various culture systems were tested on both mf and L3, using survival (% motile), motility (T(90) = mean duration (days) at which at least 90% of parasites were fully active) and moulting rates of L3 as the major criteria. The general linear model regression analysis was performed to assess the contribution of each variable on the viability of Loa loa L3 and microfilarie. All statistical tests were performed at 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Of the three different media tested, DMEM and IMDM were the most suitable sustaining the maintenance of both L. loa L3 and mf. IMDM alone could sustain L3 for more than 5 days (T(90) = 6.5 ± 1.1 day). Serum supplements and LLC-MK2 co-cultures significantly improved the survival of parasites in DMEM and IMDM. In co-cultures with LLC-MK2 cells, L. loa mf were maintained in each of the three basic media (T(90) of 16.4–19.5 days) without any serum supplement. The most effective culture systems promoting significant moulting rate of L3 into L4 (at least 25%) with substantial maintenance time were: DMEM + BSA, DMEM + NCS, DMEM-AlbuMax®II, DMEM + FBS all in co-culture with LLC-MK2, and IMDM + BSA (1.5%), DMEM + FBS (10%) and DMEM + NCS (5%) without feeder cells. DMEM + 1% BSA in co-culture scored the highest moulting rate of 57 of 81 (70.37%). The factors that promoted L. loa mf viability included feeder cells (β = 0.490), both IMDM (β = 0.256) and DMEM (β = 0.198) media and the protein supplements NCS (β = 0.052) and FBS (β = 0.022); while for L. loa L3, in addition to feeder cells (β = 0.259) and both IMDM (β = 0.401) and DMEM (β = 0.385) media, the protein supplements BSA (β = 0.029) were found important in maintaining the worm motility. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this work display a range of culture requirements for the maintenance of Loa loa stages, which are suitable for developing an effective platform for drug screening. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2852-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5930665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59306652018-05-09 Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa Zofou, Denis Fombad, Fanny Fri Gandjui, Narcisse V. T. Njouendou, Abdel Jelil Kengne-Ouafo, Arnaud Jonas Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W. Datchoua-Poutcheu, Fabrice R. Enyong, Peter A. Bita, Dizzle Tayong Taylor, Mark J. Turner, Joseph D. Wanji, Samuel Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Suitable and scalable in vitro culture conditions for parasite maintenance are needed to foster drug research for loiasis, one of the neglected tropical diseases which has attracted only limited attention over recent years, despite having important public health impacts. The present work aims to develop adequate in vitro culture systems for drug screening against both microfilariae (mf) and infective third-stage larvae (L3) of Loa loa. METHODS: In vitro culture conditions were evaluated by varying three basic culture media: Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640), Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM); four sera/proteins: newborn calf serum (NCS), foetal bovine serum (FBS), bovine serum albumin (BSA) and the lipid-enriched BSA (AlbuMax® II, ALB); and co-culture with the Monkey Kidney Epithelial Cell line (LLC-MK2) as a feeder layer. The various culture systems were tested on both mf and L3, using survival (% motile), motility (T(90) = mean duration (days) at which at least 90% of parasites were fully active) and moulting rates of L3 as the major criteria. The general linear model regression analysis was performed to assess the contribution of each variable on the viability of Loa loa L3 and microfilarie. All statistical tests were performed at 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Of the three different media tested, DMEM and IMDM were the most suitable sustaining the maintenance of both L. loa L3 and mf. IMDM alone could sustain L3 for more than 5 days (T(90) = 6.5 ± 1.1 day). Serum supplements and LLC-MK2 co-cultures significantly improved the survival of parasites in DMEM and IMDM. In co-cultures with LLC-MK2 cells, L. loa mf were maintained in each of the three basic media (T(90) of 16.4–19.5 days) without any serum supplement. The most effective culture systems promoting significant moulting rate of L3 into L4 (at least 25%) with substantial maintenance time were: DMEM + BSA, DMEM + NCS, DMEM-AlbuMax®II, DMEM + FBS all in co-culture with LLC-MK2, and IMDM + BSA (1.5%), DMEM + FBS (10%) and DMEM + NCS (5%) without feeder cells. DMEM + 1% BSA in co-culture scored the highest moulting rate of 57 of 81 (70.37%). The factors that promoted L. loa mf viability included feeder cells (β = 0.490), both IMDM (β = 0.256) and DMEM (β = 0.198) media and the protein supplements NCS (β = 0.052) and FBS (β = 0.022); while for L. loa L3, in addition to feeder cells (β = 0.259) and both IMDM (β = 0.401) and DMEM (β = 0.385) media, the protein supplements BSA (β = 0.029) were found important in maintaining the worm motility. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this work display a range of culture requirements for the maintenance of Loa loa stages, which are suitable for developing an effective platform for drug screening. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2852-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5930665/ /pubmed/29716646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2852-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zofou, Denis
Fombad, Fanny Fri
Gandjui, Narcisse V. T.
Njouendou, Abdel Jelil
Kengne-Ouafo, Arnaud Jonas
Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W.
Datchoua-Poutcheu, Fabrice R.
Enyong, Peter A.
Bita, Dizzle Tayong
Taylor, Mark J.
Turner, Joseph D.
Wanji, Samuel
Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa
title Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa
title_full Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa
title_fullStr Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa
title_short Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa
title_sort evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of loa loa
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716646
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2852-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zofoudenis evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa
AT fombadfannyfri evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa
AT gandjuinarcissevt evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa
AT njouendouabdeljelil evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa
AT kengneouafoarnaudjonas evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa
AT chounnandongmopatrickw evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa
AT datchouapoutcheufabricer evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa
AT enyongpetera evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa
AT bitadizzletayong evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa
AT taylormarkj evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa
AT turnerjosephd evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa
AT wanjisamuel evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa