Cargando…
Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa
BACKGROUND: Suitable and scalable in vitro culture conditions for parasite maintenance are needed to foster drug research for loiasis, one of the neglected tropical diseases which has attracted only limited attention over recent years, despite having important public health impacts. The present work...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2852-2 |
_version_ | 1783319519363596288 |
---|---|
author | Zofou, Denis Fombad, Fanny Fri Gandjui, Narcisse V. T. Njouendou, Abdel Jelil Kengne-Ouafo, Arnaud Jonas Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W. Datchoua-Poutcheu, Fabrice R. Enyong, Peter A. Bita, Dizzle Tayong Taylor, Mark J. Turner, Joseph D. Wanji, Samuel |
author_facet | Zofou, Denis Fombad, Fanny Fri Gandjui, Narcisse V. T. Njouendou, Abdel Jelil Kengne-Ouafo, Arnaud Jonas Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W. Datchoua-Poutcheu, Fabrice R. Enyong, Peter A. Bita, Dizzle Tayong Taylor, Mark J. Turner, Joseph D. Wanji, Samuel |
author_sort | Zofou, Denis |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Suitable and scalable in vitro culture conditions for parasite maintenance are needed to foster drug research for loiasis, one of the neglected tropical diseases which has attracted only limited attention over recent years, despite having important public health impacts. The present work aims to develop adequate in vitro culture systems for drug screening against both microfilariae (mf) and infective third-stage larvae (L3) of Loa loa. METHODS: In vitro culture conditions were evaluated by varying three basic culture media: Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640), Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM); four sera/proteins: newborn calf serum (NCS), foetal bovine serum (FBS), bovine serum albumin (BSA) and the lipid-enriched BSA (AlbuMax® II, ALB); and co-culture with the Monkey Kidney Epithelial Cell line (LLC-MK2) as a feeder layer. The various culture systems were tested on both mf and L3, using survival (% motile), motility (T(90) = mean duration (days) at which at least 90% of parasites were fully active) and moulting rates of L3 as the major criteria. The general linear model regression analysis was performed to assess the contribution of each variable on the viability of Loa loa L3 and microfilarie. All statistical tests were performed at 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Of the three different media tested, DMEM and IMDM were the most suitable sustaining the maintenance of both L. loa L3 and mf. IMDM alone could sustain L3 for more than 5 days (T(90) = 6.5 ± 1.1 day). Serum supplements and LLC-MK2 co-cultures significantly improved the survival of parasites in DMEM and IMDM. In co-cultures with LLC-MK2 cells, L. loa mf were maintained in each of the three basic media (T(90) of 16.4–19.5 days) without any serum supplement. The most effective culture systems promoting significant moulting rate of L3 into L4 (at least 25%) with substantial maintenance time were: DMEM + BSA, DMEM + NCS, DMEM-AlbuMax®II, DMEM + FBS all in co-culture with LLC-MK2, and IMDM + BSA (1.5%), DMEM + FBS (10%) and DMEM + NCS (5%) without feeder cells. DMEM + 1% BSA in co-culture scored the highest moulting rate of 57 of 81 (70.37%). The factors that promoted L. loa mf viability included feeder cells (β = 0.490), both IMDM (β = 0.256) and DMEM (β = 0.198) media and the protein supplements NCS (β = 0.052) and FBS (β = 0.022); while for L. loa L3, in addition to feeder cells (β = 0.259) and both IMDM (β = 0.401) and DMEM (β = 0.385) media, the protein supplements BSA (β = 0.029) were found important in maintaining the worm motility. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this work display a range of culture requirements for the maintenance of Loa loa stages, which are suitable for developing an effective platform for drug screening. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2852-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5930665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59306652018-05-09 Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa Zofou, Denis Fombad, Fanny Fri Gandjui, Narcisse V. T. Njouendou, Abdel Jelil Kengne-Ouafo, Arnaud Jonas Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W. Datchoua-Poutcheu, Fabrice R. Enyong, Peter A. Bita, Dizzle Tayong Taylor, Mark J. Turner, Joseph D. Wanji, Samuel Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Suitable and scalable in vitro culture conditions for parasite maintenance are needed to foster drug research for loiasis, one of the neglected tropical diseases which has attracted only limited attention over recent years, despite having important public health impacts. The present work aims to develop adequate in vitro culture systems for drug screening against both microfilariae (mf) and infective third-stage larvae (L3) of Loa loa. METHODS: In vitro culture conditions were evaluated by varying three basic culture media: Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI-1640), Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and Iscove’s modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM); four sera/proteins: newborn calf serum (NCS), foetal bovine serum (FBS), bovine serum albumin (BSA) and the lipid-enriched BSA (AlbuMax® II, ALB); and co-culture with the Monkey Kidney Epithelial Cell line (LLC-MK2) as a feeder layer. The various culture systems were tested on both mf and L3, using survival (% motile), motility (T(90) = mean duration (days) at which at least 90% of parasites were fully active) and moulting rates of L3 as the major criteria. The general linear model regression analysis was performed to assess the contribution of each variable on the viability of Loa loa L3 and microfilarie. All statistical tests were performed at 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Of the three different media tested, DMEM and IMDM were the most suitable sustaining the maintenance of both L. loa L3 and mf. IMDM alone could sustain L3 for more than 5 days (T(90) = 6.5 ± 1.1 day). Serum supplements and LLC-MK2 co-cultures significantly improved the survival of parasites in DMEM and IMDM. In co-cultures with LLC-MK2 cells, L. loa mf were maintained in each of the three basic media (T(90) of 16.4–19.5 days) without any serum supplement. The most effective culture systems promoting significant moulting rate of L3 into L4 (at least 25%) with substantial maintenance time were: DMEM + BSA, DMEM + NCS, DMEM-AlbuMax®II, DMEM + FBS all in co-culture with LLC-MK2, and IMDM + BSA (1.5%), DMEM + FBS (10%) and DMEM + NCS (5%) without feeder cells. DMEM + 1% BSA in co-culture scored the highest moulting rate of 57 of 81 (70.37%). The factors that promoted L. loa mf viability included feeder cells (β = 0.490), both IMDM (β = 0.256) and DMEM (β = 0.198) media and the protein supplements NCS (β = 0.052) and FBS (β = 0.022); while for L. loa L3, in addition to feeder cells (β = 0.259) and both IMDM (β = 0.401) and DMEM (β = 0.385) media, the protein supplements BSA (β = 0.029) were found important in maintaining the worm motility. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this work display a range of culture requirements for the maintenance of Loa loa stages, which are suitable for developing an effective platform for drug screening. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2852-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5930665/ /pubmed/29716646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2852-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Zofou, Denis Fombad, Fanny Fri Gandjui, Narcisse V. T. Njouendou, Abdel Jelil Kengne-Ouafo, Arnaud Jonas Chounna Ndongmo, Patrick W. Datchoua-Poutcheu, Fabrice R. Enyong, Peter A. Bita, Dizzle Tayong Taylor, Mark J. Turner, Joseph D. Wanji, Samuel Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa |
title | Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa |
title_full | Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa |
title_short | Evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of Loa loa |
title_sort | evaluation of in vitro culture systems for the maintenance of microfilariae and infective larvae of loa loa |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2852-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zofoudenis evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa AT fombadfannyfri evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa AT gandjuinarcissevt evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa AT njouendouabdeljelil evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa AT kengneouafoarnaudjonas evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa AT chounnandongmopatrickw evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa AT datchouapoutcheufabricer evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa AT enyongpetera evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa AT bitadizzletayong evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa AT taylormarkj evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa AT turnerjosephd evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa AT wanjisamuel evaluationofinvitroculturesystemsforthemaintenanceofmicrofilariaeandinfectivelarvaeofloaloa |