Cargando…
Comparison of McMaster and FECPAK(G2) methods for counting nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas
This study aimed to compare the FECPAK(G2) and the McMaster techniques for counting of gastrointestinal nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas using two floatation solutions (saturated sodium chloride and sucrose solutions). Faecal eggs counts from both techniques were compared using the Lin’s conco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2861-1 |
_version_ | 1783319544343822336 |
---|---|
author | Rashid, Mohammed H. Stevenson, Mark A. Waenga, Shea Mirams, Greg Campbell, Angus J. D. Vaughan, Jane L. Jabbar, Abdul |
author_facet | Rashid, Mohammed H. Stevenson, Mark A. Waenga, Shea Mirams, Greg Campbell, Angus J. D. Vaughan, Jane L. Jabbar, Abdul |
author_sort | Rashid, Mohammed H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to compare the FECPAK(G2) and the McMaster techniques for counting of gastrointestinal nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas using two floatation solutions (saturated sodium chloride and sucrose solutions). Faecal eggs counts from both techniques were compared using the Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient and Bland and Altman statistics. Results showed moderate to good agreement between the two methods, with better agreement achieved when saturated sugar is used as a floatation fluid, particularly when faecal egg counts are less than 1000 eggs per gram of faeces. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study to assess agreement of measurements between McMaster and FECPAK(G2) methods for estimating faecal eggs in South American camelids. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2861-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5930814 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59308142018-05-09 Comparison of McMaster and FECPAK(G2) methods for counting nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas Rashid, Mohammed H. Stevenson, Mark A. Waenga, Shea Mirams, Greg Campbell, Angus J. D. Vaughan, Jane L. Jabbar, Abdul Parasit Vectors Letter to the Editor This study aimed to compare the FECPAK(G2) and the McMaster techniques for counting of gastrointestinal nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas using two floatation solutions (saturated sodium chloride and sucrose solutions). Faecal eggs counts from both techniques were compared using the Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient and Bland and Altman statistics. Results showed moderate to good agreement between the two methods, with better agreement achieved when saturated sugar is used as a floatation fluid, particularly when faecal egg counts are less than 1000 eggs per gram of faeces. To the best of our knowledge this is the first study to assess agreement of measurements between McMaster and FECPAK(G2) methods for estimating faecal eggs in South American camelids. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13071-018-2861-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5930814/ /pubmed/29716657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2861-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Letter to the Editor Rashid, Mohammed H. Stevenson, Mark A. Waenga, Shea Mirams, Greg Campbell, Angus J. D. Vaughan, Jane L. Jabbar, Abdul Comparison of McMaster and FECPAK(G2) methods for counting nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas |
title | Comparison of McMaster and FECPAK(G2) methods for counting nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas |
title_full | Comparison of McMaster and FECPAK(G2) methods for counting nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas |
title_fullStr | Comparison of McMaster and FECPAK(G2) methods for counting nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of McMaster and FECPAK(G2) methods for counting nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas |
title_short | Comparison of McMaster and FECPAK(G2) methods for counting nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas |
title_sort | comparison of mcmaster and fecpak(g2) methods for counting nematode eggs in the faeces of alpacas |
topic | Letter to the Editor |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930814/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2861-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rashidmohammedh comparisonofmcmasterandfecpakg2methodsforcountingnematodeeggsinthefaecesofalpacas AT stevensonmarka comparisonofmcmasterandfecpakg2methodsforcountingnematodeeggsinthefaecesofalpacas AT waengashea comparisonofmcmasterandfecpakg2methodsforcountingnematodeeggsinthefaecesofalpacas AT miramsgreg comparisonofmcmasterandfecpakg2methodsforcountingnematodeeggsinthefaecesofalpacas AT campbellangusjd comparisonofmcmasterandfecpakg2methodsforcountingnematodeeggsinthefaecesofalpacas AT vaughanjanel comparisonofmcmasterandfecpakg2methodsforcountingnematodeeggsinthefaecesofalpacas AT jabbarabdul comparisonofmcmasterandfecpakg2methodsforcountingnematodeeggsinthefaecesofalpacas |