Cargando…

Single-stage laparoscopic surgery for bilateral organ tumors using a transumbilical approach with a zigzag incision: a report of two cases

BACKGROUND: Reduced port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) is comparable to conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery and has the potential to provide improved cosmesis and decreased pain; as such, it satisfies a growing demand for less invasive surgical procedures. Moreover, a zigzag incision of the um...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kato, Yoichiro, Kato, Renpei, Takayama, Misato, Ikarashi, Daiki, Onoda, Mitsutaka, Matsuura, Tomohiko, Kanehira, Mitsugu, Takata, Ryo, Baba, Shigeaki, Kimura, Toshimoto, Otsuka, Koki, Sugimura, Jun, Omori, So, Sasaki, Akira, Obara, Wataru
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0343-6
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Reduced port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) is comparable to conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery and has the potential to provide improved cosmesis and decreased pain; as such, it satisfies a growing demand for less invasive surgical procedures. Moreover, a zigzag incision of the umbilicus results in a less visible scar in plastic surgery. Here we report a series of two cases with bilateral organ tumors treated by single-stage RPLS using a combination of a transumbilical approach and a zigzag incision. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1: A 63-year-old man was diagnosed with right renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (clear cell carcinoma, pT1a, venous invasion (−)) and a splenic tumor (cavernous hemangioma). Case 2: An 84-year-old woman was diagnosed with concurrent left RCC (clear cell carcinoma, pT1b, 65 × 65 mm, venous invasion (+)) and ascending colon cancer (adenocarcinoma pT3 with no nodal involvement (0/48)). The perioperative course was uneventful in both cases. However, an additional incision was required in Case 2 for specimen excision. Therefore, the scars were more obvious in Case 2 than in Case 1. CONCLUSIONS: Although more cases are required to evaluate the superiority of this technique, this novel procedure could be considered for patients with bilateral lesions.