Cargando…

Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Belgian forestry workers and associated risk factors

BACKGROUND: As forest is the preferred environment for ticks, forestry workers are exposed to tick bites and tick-borne diseases. We assessed the seroprevalence of anti-Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) antibodies and investigated, using an integrated landscape approach, the individual and environmental fac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Keukeleire, Mathilde, Robert, Annie, Luyasu, Victor, Kabamba, Benoît, Vanwambeke, Sophie O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2860-2
_version_ 1783319555354918912
author De Keukeleire, Mathilde
Robert, Annie
Luyasu, Victor
Kabamba, Benoît
Vanwambeke, Sophie O.
author_facet De Keukeleire, Mathilde
Robert, Annie
Luyasu, Victor
Kabamba, Benoît
Vanwambeke, Sophie O.
author_sort De Keukeleire, Mathilde
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: As forest is the preferred environment for ticks, forestry workers are exposed to tick bites and tick-borne diseases. We assessed the seroprevalence of anti-Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) antibodies and investigated, using an integrated landscape approach, the individual and environmental factors associated with the seroprevalence of Bb in Belgian forestry workers, a high-risk group in Belgium. METHODS: A group of 310 Belgian forest workers was examined to assess the seroprevalence of anti-Borrelia IgG antibodies. Using principal component analysis and binary logistic regression, the joint effects of individual characteristics and environmental characteristics were examined. RESULTS: Sixty-seven of the 310 workers were seropositive for Lyme disease (LD), leading to a seroprevalence of 21.6%. The seroprevalence was higher among forest workers visiting forests more frequently (P = 0.003) or who reported over 100 tick bites (P-value < 0.001). The intensity of tick bites and the use of protection measures against tick bites have a positive impact on LD seroprevalence while the quantity of shadow from trees at ground level had a negative one. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that forest workers are a population at risk for LD and, by extension, at risk for various tick-borne diseases. In addition to the role of the environment, our results also showed the importance of considering exposure when predicting the risk of infection by Bb.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5930862
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59308622018-05-09 Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Belgian forestry workers and associated risk factors De Keukeleire, Mathilde Robert, Annie Luyasu, Victor Kabamba, Benoît Vanwambeke, Sophie O. Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: As forest is the preferred environment for ticks, forestry workers are exposed to tick bites and tick-borne diseases. We assessed the seroprevalence of anti-Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) antibodies and investigated, using an integrated landscape approach, the individual and environmental factors associated with the seroprevalence of Bb in Belgian forestry workers, a high-risk group in Belgium. METHODS: A group of 310 Belgian forest workers was examined to assess the seroprevalence of anti-Borrelia IgG antibodies. Using principal component analysis and binary logistic regression, the joint effects of individual characteristics and environmental characteristics were examined. RESULTS: Sixty-seven of the 310 workers were seropositive for Lyme disease (LD), leading to a seroprevalence of 21.6%. The seroprevalence was higher among forest workers visiting forests more frequently (P = 0.003) or who reported over 100 tick bites (P-value < 0.001). The intensity of tick bites and the use of protection measures against tick bites have a positive impact on LD seroprevalence while the quantity of shadow from trees at ground level had a negative one. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that forest workers are a population at risk for LD and, by extension, at risk for various tick-borne diseases. In addition to the role of the environment, our results also showed the importance of considering exposure when predicting the risk of infection by Bb. BioMed Central 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5930862/ /pubmed/29716647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2860-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
De Keukeleire, Mathilde
Robert, Annie
Luyasu, Victor
Kabamba, Benoît
Vanwambeke, Sophie O.
Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Belgian forestry workers and associated risk factors
title Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Belgian forestry workers and associated risk factors
title_full Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Belgian forestry workers and associated risk factors
title_fullStr Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Belgian forestry workers and associated risk factors
title_full_unstemmed Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Belgian forestry workers and associated risk factors
title_short Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Belgian forestry workers and associated risk factors
title_sort seroprevalence of borrelia burgdorferi in belgian forestry workers and associated risk factors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5930862/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29716647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2860-2
work_keys_str_mv AT dekeukeleiremathilde seroprevalenceofborreliaburgdorferiinbelgianforestryworkersandassociatedriskfactors
AT robertannie seroprevalenceofborreliaburgdorferiinbelgianforestryworkersandassociatedriskfactors
AT luyasuvictor seroprevalenceofborreliaburgdorferiinbelgianforestryworkersandassociatedriskfactors
AT kabambabenoit seroprevalenceofborreliaburgdorferiinbelgianforestryworkersandassociatedriskfactors
AT vanwambekesophieo seroprevalenceofborreliaburgdorferiinbelgianforestryworkersandassociatedriskfactors