Cargando…

Repeatability of Retinal Sensitivity Measurements Using a Medmont Dark-Adapted Chromatic Perimeter in Healthy and Age-Related Macular Degeneration Cases

PURPOSE: To determine the intrasession and intersession test–retest repeatability of retinal sensitivity measurements using a dark-adapted chromatic perimeter (DACP). METHODS: For intrasession testing, retinal sensitivity within the central 24° for the 505-nm stimulus was measured after 20, 30, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Rose S., Guymer, Robyn H., Luu, Chi D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29736324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.7.3.3
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To determine the intrasession and intersession test–retest repeatability of retinal sensitivity measurements using a dark-adapted chromatic perimeter (DACP). METHODS: For intrasession testing, retinal sensitivity within the central 24° for the 505-nm stimulus was measured after 20, 30, and 40 minutes of dark adaptation (DA) and for the 625-nm stimulus was measured after the first and second 505-nm tests. For intersession testing, retinal sensitivity for both stimuli was measured after 30 minutes of DA at baseline and 1 month. The point-wise sensitivity (PWS) difference and coefficient of repeatability (CoR) of each stimulus and group were determined. RESULTS: For intrasession testing, 10 age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and eight control subjects were recruited. The overall CoR for the 505-nm stimulus was 8.4 dB for control subjects and 9.1 dB for AMD cases, and for the 625-nm stimulus was 6.7 dB for control subjects and 9.5 dB for AMD cases. For intersession testing, seven AMD cases and 13 control subjects returned an overall CoR for the 505-nm stimulus of 8.2 dB for the control and 11.7 dB for the AMD group. For the 625-nm stimulus the CoR was 6.2 dB for the control group and 8.4 dB for the AMD group. Approximately 80% of all test points had a PWS difference of ±5 dB between the two intrasession or intersession measurements for both stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: The CoR for the DACP is larger than that reported for scotopic perimeters; however, the majority of test points had a PWS difference of ±5 dB between tests. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The DACP offers an opportunity to measure static and dynamic rod function at multiple locations with an acceptable reproducibility level.