Cargando…
Should surgery be delayed in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants who suffer a hip fracture? A retrospective, case-controlled observational study at a UK major trauma centre
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether not waiting for the elimination of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has an effect on the amount of perioperative bleeding in patients who undergo operative treatment of a hip fracture. DESIGN: Observation, retrospective case–control study. SETTING: A single UK major...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29705761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020625 |
_version_ | 1783319624856633344 |
---|---|
author | Mullins, Barry Akehurst, Harold Slattery, David Chesser, Tim |
author_facet | Mullins, Barry Akehurst, Harold Slattery, David Chesser, Tim |
author_sort | Mullins, Barry |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine whether not waiting for the elimination of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has an effect on the amount of perioperative bleeding in patients who undergo operative treatment of a hip fracture. DESIGN: Observation, retrospective case–control study. SETTING: A single UK major trauma centre. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who sustained a hip fracture were identified using the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). All those found to be taking a DOAC at the time of fracture were identified (n=63). A matched group not taking a DOAC was also identified from the NHFD (n=62). MAIN OUTCOME: Perioperative drop in haemoglobin concentration. RESULTS: There was no relationship between admission to operation interval and perioperative change in haemoglobin concentration in patients taking DOACs (regression coefficient=−0.06 g/L/hour; 95% CI −0.32–0.20; p=0.64). No relationship was found between the time from admission to operation interval and the probability of transfusion (OR=0.94; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.90; p=0.16) or reoperation (OR=1.04; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.16; p=0.49). One mortality was recorded in the DOAC group within 30 days of admission, and this compared with five in the matched group of patients (p=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Delaying surgery in patients who sustain a hip fracture who are taking a DOAC drug has not been shown to reduce perioperative bleeding or affect their mortality in this study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5931299 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59312992018-05-04 Should surgery be delayed in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants who suffer a hip fracture? A retrospective, case-controlled observational study at a UK major trauma centre Mullins, Barry Akehurst, Harold Slattery, David Chesser, Tim BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVE: To determine whether not waiting for the elimination of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has an effect on the amount of perioperative bleeding in patients who undergo operative treatment of a hip fracture. DESIGN: Observation, retrospective case–control study. SETTING: A single UK major trauma centre. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who sustained a hip fracture were identified using the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). All those found to be taking a DOAC at the time of fracture were identified (n=63). A matched group not taking a DOAC was also identified from the NHFD (n=62). MAIN OUTCOME: Perioperative drop in haemoglobin concentration. RESULTS: There was no relationship between admission to operation interval and perioperative change in haemoglobin concentration in patients taking DOACs (regression coefficient=−0.06 g/L/hour; 95% CI −0.32–0.20; p=0.64). No relationship was found between the time from admission to operation interval and the probability of transfusion (OR=0.94; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.90; p=0.16) or reoperation (OR=1.04; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.16; p=0.49). One mortality was recorded in the DOAC group within 30 days of admission, and this compared with five in the matched group of patients (p=0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Delaying surgery in patients who sustain a hip fracture who are taking a DOAC drug has not been shown to reduce perioperative bleeding or affect their mortality in this study. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5931299/ /pubmed/29705761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020625 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Surgery Mullins, Barry Akehurst, Harold Slattery, David Chesser, Tim Should surgery be delayed in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants who suffer a hip fracture? A retrospective, case-controlled observational study at a UK major trauma centre |
title | Should surgery be delayed in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants who suffer a hip fracture? A retrospective, case-controlled observational study at a UK major trauma centre |
title_full | Should surgery be delayed in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants who suffer a hip fracture? A retrospective, case-controlled observational study at a UK major trauma centre |
title_fullStr | Should surgery be delayed in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants who suffer a hip fracture? A retrospective, case-controlled observational study at a UK major trauma centre |
title_full_unstemmed | Should surgery be delayed in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants who suffer a hip fracture? A retrospective, case-controlled observational study at a UK major trauma centre |
title_short | Should surgery be delayed in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants who suffer a hip fracture? A retrospective, case-controlled observational study at a UK major trauma centre |
title_sort | should surgery be delayed in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants who suffer a hip fracture? a retrospective, case-controlled observational study at a uk major trauma centre |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931299/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29705761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020625 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullinsbarry shouldsurgerybedelayedinpatientstakingdirectoralanticoagulantswhosufferahipfracturearetrospectivecasecontrolledobservationalstudyataukmajortraumacentre AT akehurstharold shouldsurgerybedelayedinpatientstakingdirectoralanticoagulantswhosufferahipfracturearetrospectivecasecontrolledobservationalstudyataukmajortraumacentre AT slatterydavid shouldsurgerybedelayedinpatientstakingdirectoralanticoagulantswhosufferahipfracturearetrospectivecasecontrolledobservationalstudyataukmajortraumacentre AT chessertim shouldsurgerybedelayedinpatientstakingdirectoralanticoagulantswhosufferahipfracturearetrospectivecasecontrolledobservationalstudyataukmajortraumacentre |