Cargando…

Systematic review of prediction models for delirium in the older adult inpatient

OBJECTIVE: To identify existing prognostic delirium prediction models and evaluate their validity and statistical methodology in the older adult (≥60 years) acute hospital population. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO, SocINFO, Cochrane, Web of Science an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindroth, Heidi, Bratzke, Lisa, Purvis, Suzanne, Brown, Roger, Coburn, Mark, Mrkobrada, Marko, Chan, Matthew T V, Davis, Daniel H J, Pandharipande, Pratik, Carlsson, Cynthia M, Sanders, Robert D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29705752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019223
_version_ 1783319626499751936
author Lindroth, Heidi
Bratzke, Lisa
Purvis, Suzanne
Brown, Roger
Coburn, Mark
Mrkobrada, Marko
Chan, Matthew T V
Davis, Daniel H J
Pandharipande, Pratik
Carlsson, Cynthia M
Sanders, Robert D
author_facet Lindroth, Heidi
Bratzke, Lisa
Purvis, Suzanne
Brown, Roger
Coburn, Mark
Mrkobrada, Marko
Chan, Matthew T V
Davis, Daniel H J
Pandharipande, Pratik
Carlsson, Cynthia M
Sanders, Robert D
author_sort Lindroth, Heidi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify existing prognostic delirium prediction models and evaluate their validity and statistical methodology in the older adult (≥60 years) acute hospital population. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO, SocINFO, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase were searched from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2016. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and CHARMS Statement guided protocol development. Inclusion criteria: age >60 years, inpatient, developed/validated a prognostic delirium prediction model. Exclusion criteria: alcohol-related delirium, sample size ≤50. The primary performance measures were calibration and discrimination statistics. Two authors independently conducted search and extracted data. The synthesis of data was done by the first author. Disagreement was resolved by the mentoring author. RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 7,502 studies. Following full-text review of 192 studies, 33 were excluded based on age criteria (<60 years) and 27 met the defined criteria. Twenty-three delirium prediction models were identified, 14 were externally validated and 3 were internally validated. The following populations were represented: 11 medical, 3 medical/surgical and 13 surgical. The assessment of delirium was often non-systematic, resulting in varied incidence. Fourteen models were externally validated with an area under the receiver operating curve range from 0.52 to 0.94. Limitations in design, data collection methods and model metric reporting statistics were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Delirium prediction models for older adults show variable and typically inadequate predictive capabilities. Our review highlights the need for development of robust models to predict delirium in older inpatients. We provide recommendations for the development of such models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5931306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59313062018-05-04 Systematic review of prediction models for delirium in the older adult inpatient Lindroth, Heidi Bratzke, Lisa Purvis, Suzanne Brown, Roger Coburn, Mark Mrkobrada, Marko Chan, Matthew T V Davis, Daniel H J Pandharipande, Pratik Carlsson, Cynthia M Sanders, Robert D BMJ Open Geriatric Medicine OBJECTIVE: To identify existing prognostic delirium prediction models and evaluate their validity and statistical methodology in the older adult (≥60 years) acute hospital population. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES AND METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO, SocINFO, Cochrane, Web of Science and Embase were searched from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2016. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and CHARMS Statement guided protocol development. Inclusion criteria: age >60 years, inpatient, developed/validated a prognostic delirium prediction model. Exclusion criteria: alcohol-related delirium, sample size ≤50. The primary performance measures were calibration and discrimination statistics. Two authors independently conducted search and extracted data. The synthesis of data was done by the first author. Disagreement was resolved by the mentoring author. RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 7,502 studies. Following full-text review of 192 studies, 33 were excluded based on age criteria (<60 years) and 27 met the defined criteria. Twenty-three delirium prediction models were identified, 14 were externally validated and 3 were internally validated. The following populations were represented: 11 medical, 3 medical/surgical and 13 surgical. The assessment of delirium was often non-systematic, resulting in varied incidence. Fourteen models were externally validated with an area under the receiver operating curve range from 0.52 to 0.94. Limitations in design, data collection methods and model metric reporting statistics were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Delirium prediction models for older adults show variable and typically inadequate predictive capabilities. Our review highlights the need for development of robust models to predict delirium in older inpatients. We provide recommendations for the development of such models. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5931306/ /pubmed/29705752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019223 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Geriatric Medicine
Lindroth, Heidi
Bratzke, Lisa
Purvis, Suzanne
Brown, Roger
Coburn, Mark
Mrkobrada, Marko
Chan, Matthew T V
Davis, Daniel H J
Pandharipande, Pratik
Carlsson, Cynthia M
Sanders, Robert D
Systematic review of prediction models for delirium in the older adult inpatient
title Systematic review of prediction models for delirium in the older adult inpatient
title_full Systematic review of prediction models for delirium in the older adult inpatient
title_fullStr Systematic review of prediction models for delirium in the older adult inpatient
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of prediction models for delirium in the older adult inpatient
title_short Systematic review of prediction models for delirium in the older adult inpatient
title_sort systematic review of prediction models for delirium in the older adult inpatient
topic Geriatric Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29705752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019223
work_keys_str_mv AT lindrothheidi systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsfordeliriumintheolderadultinpatient
AT bratzkelisa systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsfordeliriumintheolderadultinpatient
AT purvissuzanne systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsfordeliriumintheolderadultinpatient
AT brownroger systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsfordeliriumintheolderadultinpatient
AT coburnmark systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsfordeliriumintheolderadultinpatient
AT mrkobradamarko systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsfordeliriumintheolderadultinpatient
AT chanmatthewtv systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsfordeliriumintheolderadultinpatient
AT davisdanielhj systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsfordeliriumintheolderadultinpatient
AT pandharipandepratik systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsfordeliriumintheolderadultinpatient
AT carlssoncynthiam systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsfordeliriumintheolderadultinpatient
AT sandersrobertd systematicreviewofpredictionmodelsfordeliriumintheolderadultinpatient