Cargando…

Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings

Reconfigurations of synchronized large-scale networks are thought to be central neural mechanisms that support cognition and behavior in the human brain. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings together with recent advances in network analysis now allow for sub-second snapshots of such networks. In...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liljeström, Mia, Vartiainen, Johanna, Kujala, Jan, Salmelin, Riitta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29718993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196773
_version_ 1783319681228079104
author Liljeström, Mia
Vartiainen, Johanna
Kujala, Jan
Salmelin, Riitta
author_facet Liljeström, Mia
Vartiainen, Johanna
Kujala, Jan
Salmelin, Riitta
author_sort Liljeström, Mia
collection PubMed
description Reconfigurations of synchronized large-scale networks are thought to be central neural mechanisms that support cognition and behavior in the human brain. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings together with recent advances in network analysis now allow for sub-second snapshots of such networks. In the present study, we compared frequency-resolved functional connectivity patterns underlying reading of single words and visual recognition of symbol strings. Word reading emphasized coherence in a left-lateralized network with nodes in classical perisylvian language regions, whereas symbol processing recruited a bilateral network, including connections between frontal and parietal regions previously associated with spatial attention and visual working memory. Our results illustrate the flexible nature of functional networks, whereby processing of different form categories, written words vs. symbol strings, leads to the formation of large-scale functional networks that operate at distinct oscillatory frequencies and incorporate task-relevant regions. These results suggest that category-specific processing should be viewed not so much as a local process but as a distributed neural process implemented in signature networks. For words, increased coherence was detected particularly in the alpha (8–13 Hz) and high gamma (60–90 Hz) frequency bands, whereas increased coherence for symbol strings was observed in the high beta (21–29 Hz) and low gamma (30–45 Hz) frequency range. These findings attest to the role of coherence in specific frequency bands as a general mechanism for integrating stimulus-dependent information across brain regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5931649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59316492018-05-11 Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings Liljeström, Mia Vartiainen, Johanna Kujala, Jan Salmelin, Riitta PLoS One Research Article Reconfigurations of synchronized large-scale networks are thought to be central neural mechanisms that support cognition and behavior in the human brain. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings together with recent advances in network analysis now allow for sub-second snapshots of such networks. In the present study, we compared frequency-resolved functional connectivity patterns underlying reading of single words and visual recognition of symbol strings. Word reading emphasized coherence in a left-lateralized network with nodes in classical perisylvian language regions, whereas symbol processing recruited a bilateral network, including connections between frontal and parietal regions previously associated with spatial attention and visual working memory. Our results illustrate the flexible nature of functional networks, whereby processing of different form categories, written words vs. symbol strings, leads to the formation of large-scale functional networks that operate at distinct oscillatory frequencies and incorporate task-relevant regions. These results suggest that category-specific processing should be viewed not so much as a local process but as a distributed neural process implemented in signature networks. For words, increased coherence was detected particularly in the alpha (8–13 Hz) and high gamma (60–90 Hz) frequency bands, whereas increased coherence for symbol strings was observed in the high beta (21–29 Hz) and low gamma (30–45 Hz) frequency range. These findings attest to the role of coherence in specific frequency bands as a general mechanism for integrating stimulus-dependent information across brain regions. Public Library of Science 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5931649/ /pubmed/29718993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196773 Text en © 2018 Liljeström et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liljeström, Mia
Vartiainen, Johanna
Kujala, Jan
Salmelin, Riitta
Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings
title Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings
title_full Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings
title_fullStr Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings
title_full_unstemmed Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings
title_short Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings
title_sort large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29718993
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196773
work_keys_str_mv AT liljestrommia largescalefunctionalnetworksconnectdifferentlyforprocessingwordsandsymbolstrings
AT vartiainenjohanna largescalefunctionalnetworksconnectdifferentlyforprocessingwordsandsymbolstrings
AT kujalajan largescalefunctionalnetworksconnectdifferentlyforprocessingwordsandsymbolstrings
AT salmelinriitta largescalefunctionalnetworksconnectdifferentlyforprocessingwordsandsymbolstrings