Cargando…
Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings
Reconfigurations of synchronized large-scale networks are thought to be central neural mechanisms that support cognition and behavior in the human brain. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings together with recent advances in network analysis now allow for sub-second snapshots of such networks. In...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29718993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196773 |
_version_ | 1783319681228079104 |
---|---|
author | Liljeström, Mia Vartiainen, Johanna Kujala, Jan Salmelin, Riitta |
author_facet | Liljeström, Mia Vartiainen, Johanna Kujala, Jan Salmelin, Riitta |
author_sort | Liljeström, Mia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Reconfigurations of synchronized large-scale networks are thought to be central neural mechanisms that support cognition and behavior in the human brain. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings together with recent advances in network analysis now allow for sub-second snapshots of such networks. In the present study, we compared frequency-resolved functional connectivity patterns underlying reading of single words and visual recognition of symbol strings. Word reading emphasized coherence in a left-lateralized network with nodes in classical perisylvian language regions, whereas symbol processing recruited a bilateral network, including connections between frontal and parietal regions previously associated with spatial attention and visual working memory. Our results illustrate the flexible nature of functional networks, whereby processing of different form categories, written words vs. symbol strings, leads to the formation of large-scale functional networks that operate at distinct oscillatory frequencies and incorporate task-relevant regions. These results suggest that category-specific processing should be viewed not so much as a local process but as a distributed neural process implemented in signature networks. For words, increased coherence was detected particularly in the alpha (8–13 Hz) and high gamma (60–90 Hz) frequency bands, whereas increased coherence for symbol strings was observed in the high beta (21–29 Hz) and low gamma (30–45 Hz) frequency range. These findings attest to the role of coherence in specific frequency bands as a general mechanism for integrating stimulus-dependent information across brain regions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5931649 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59316492018-05-11 Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings Liljeström, Mia Vartiainen, Johanna Kujala, Jan Salmelin, Riitta PLoS One Research Article Reconfigurations of synchronized large-scale networks are thought to be central neural mechanisms that support cognition and behavior in the human brain. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings together with recent advances in network analysis now allow for sub-second snapshots of such networks. In the present study, we compared frequency-resolved functional connectivity patterns underlying reading of single words and visual recognition of symbol strings. Word reading emphasized coherence in a left-lateralized network with nodes in classical perisylvian language regions, whereas symbol processing recruited a bilateral network, including connections between frontal and parietal regions previously associated with spatial attention and visual working memory. Our results illustrate the flexible nature of functional networks, whereby processing of different form categories, written words vs. symbol strings, leads to the formation of large-scale functional networks that operate at distinct oscillatory frequencies and incorporate task-relevant regions. These results suggest that category-specific processing should be viewed not so much as a local process but as a distributed neural process implemented in signature networks. For words, increased coherence was detected particularly in the alpha (8–13 Hz) and high gamma (60–90 Hz) frequency bands, whereas increased coherence for symbol strings was observed in the high beta (21–29 Hz) and low gamma (30–45 Hz) frequency range. These findings attest to the role of coherence in specific frequency bands as a general mechanism for integrating stimulus-dependent information across brain regions. Public Library of Science 2018-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5931649/ /pubmed/29718993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196773 Text en © 2018 Liljeström et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liljeström, Mia Vartiainen, Johanna Kujala, Jan Salmelin, Riitta Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings |
title | Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings |
title_full | Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings |
title_fullStr | Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings |
title_full_unstemmed | Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings |
title_short | Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings |
title_sort | large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931649/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29718993 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196773 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liljestrommia largescalefunctionalnetworksconnectdifferentlyforprocessingwordsandsymbolstrings AT vartiainenjohanna largescalefunctionalnetworksconnectdifferentlyforprocessingwordsandsymbolstrings AT kujalajan largescalefunctionalnetworksconnectdifferentlyforprocessingwordsandsymbolstrings AT salmelinriitta largescalefunctionalnetworksconnectdifferentlyforprocessingwordsandsymbolstrings |