Cargando…

Evidence on the cost of breast cancer drugs is required for rational decision making

BACKGROUND: For rational decision making, assessing the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of new drugs and comparing the costs of drugs already on the market is required. In addition to value frameworks, such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework and the European Society of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berghuis, Anne Margreet Sofie, Koffijberg, Hendrik, Terstappen, Leonardus Wendelinus Mathias Marie, Sleijfer, Stefan, IJzerman, Maarten Joost
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2018.825
_version_ 1783319698998296576
author Berghuis, Anne Margreet Sofie
Koffijberg, Hendrik
Terstappen, Leonardus Wendelinus Mathias Marie
Sleijfer, Stefan
IJzerman, Maarten Joost
author_facet Berghuis, Anne Margreet Sofie
Koffijberg, Hendrik
Terstappen, Leonardus Wendelinus Mathias Marie
Sleijfer, Stefan
IJzerman, Maarten Joost
author_sort Berghuis, Anne Margreet Sofie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For rational decision making, assessing the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of new drugs and comparing the costs of drugs already on the market is required. In addition to value frameworks, such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework and the European Society of Medical Oncology–Magnitude of Clinical benefit Scale, this also requires a transparent overview of actual drug prices. While list prices are available, evidence on treatment cost is not. This paper aims to synthesise evidence on the reimbursement and costs of high-cost breast cancer drugs in The Netherlands (NL). METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify currently reimbursed breast cancer drugs in the NL. Treatment costs were determined by multiplying list prices with the average length of treatment and dosing schedule. RESULTS: Comparing list prices to the estimated treatment cost resulted in substantial differences in the ranking of costliness of the drugs. The average mean treatment length was unknown for 11/31 breast cancer drugs (26.2%). The differences in the 15 highest-cost drugs were largest for Bevacizumab, Lapatinib and everolimus, with list prices of €541, €158, €1,168 and estimated treatment cost of €174,400, €18,682 and €31,207, respectively. The lowest-cost (patented) targeted drug is €1,818 more expensive than the highest-cost (off-patent) generic drug according to the estimated drug treatment cost. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of evidence on the reimbursement and cost of high-cost breast cancer drugs complicates rapid and transparent evidence synthesis, necessary to focus strategies aiming to limit the increasing healthcare costs. Interestingly, the findings show that off-patent generics (such as paclitaxel or doxorubicin), although substantially cheaper than patented drugs, are still relatively costly. Extending standardisation and increasing European and national regulations on presenting information on costs per cancer drug is highly recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5931813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cancer Intelligence
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59318132018-05-09 Evidence on the cost of breast cancer drugs is required for rational decision making Berghuis, Anne Margreet Sofie Koffijberg, Hendrik Terstappen, Leonardus Wendelinus Mathias Marie Sleijfer, Stefan IJzerman, Maarten Joost Ecancermedicalscience Research BACKGROUND: For rational decision making, assessing the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of new drugs and comparing the costs of drugs already on the market is required. In addition to value frameworks, such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework and the European Society of Medical Oncology–Magnitude of Clinical benefit Scale, this also requires a transparent overview of actual drug prices. While list prices are available, evidence on treatment cost is not. This paper aims to synthesise evidence on the reimbursement and costs of high-cost breast cancer drugs in The Netherlands (NL). METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify currently reimbursed breast cancer drugs in the NL. Treatment costs were determined by multiplying list prices with the average length of treatment and dosing schedule. RESULTS: Comparing list prices to the estimated treatment cost resulted in substantial differences in the ranking of costliness of the drugs. The average mean treatment length was unknown for 11/31 breast cancer drugs (26.2%). The differences in the 15 highest-cost drugs were largest for Bevacizumab, Lapatinib and everolimus, with list prices of €541, €158, €1,168 and estimated treatment cost of €174,400, €18,682 and €31,207, respectively. The lowest-cost (patented) targeted drug is €1,818 more expensive than the highest-cost (off-patent) generic drug according to the estimated drug treatment cost. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of evidence on the reimbursement and cost of high-cost breast cancer drugs complicates rapid and transparent evidence synthesis, necessary to focus strategies aiming to limit the increasing healthcare costs. Interestingly, the findings show that off-patent generics (such as paclitaxel or doxorubicin), although substantially cheaper than patented drugs, are still relatively costly. Extending standardisation and increasing European and national regulations on presenting information on costs per cancer drug is highly recommended. Cancer Intelligence 2018-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5931813/ /pubmed/29743945 http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2018.825 Text en © the authors; licensee ecancermedicalscience. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Berghuis, Anne Margreet Sofie
Koffijberg, Hendrik
Terstappen, Leonardus Wendelinus Mathias Marie
Sleijfer, Stefan
IJzerman, Maarten Joost
Evidence on the cost of breast cancer drugs is required for rational decision making
title Evidence on the cost of breast cancer drugs is required for rational decision making
title_full Evidence on the cost of breast cancer drugs is required for rational decision making
title_fullStr Evidence on the cost of breast cancer drugs is required for rational decision making
title_full_unstemmed Evidence on the cost of breast cancer drugs is required for rational decision making
title_short Evidence on the cost of breast cancer drugs is required for rational decision making
title_sort evidence on the cost of breast cancer drugs is required for rational decision making
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29743945
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2018.825
work_keys_str_mv AT berghuisannemargreetsofie evidenceonthecostofbreastcancerdrugsisrequiredforrationaldecisionmaking
AT koffijberghendrik evidenceonthecostofbreastcancerdrugsisrequiredforrationaldecisionmaking
AT terstappenleonarduswendelinusmathiasmarie evidenceonthecostofbreastcancerdrugsisrequiredforrationaldecisionmaking
AT sleijferstefan evidenceonthecostofbreastcancerdrugsisrequiredforrationaldecisionmaking
AT ijzermanmaartenjoost evidenceonthecostofbreastcancerdrugsisrequiredforrationaldecisionmaking