Cargando…

Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer

PURPOSE: To compare survival outcomes between bile duct segmental resection (BDR) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for the treatment of middle and distal bile duct cancer. METHODS: From 1997 to 2013, a total of 96 patients who underwent curative intent surgery for middle and distal bile duct cancer we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Naru, Lee, Huisong, Min, Seog Ki, Lee, Hyeon Kook
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Surgical Society 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732355
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2018.94.5.240
_version_ 1783319721380151296
author Kim, Naru
Lee, Huisong
Min, Seog Ki
Lee, Hyeon Kook
author_facet Kim, Naru
Lee, Huisong
Min, Seog Ki
Lee, Hyeon Kook
author_sort Kim, Naru
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare survival outcomes between bile duct segmental resection (BDR) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for the treatment of middle and distal bile duct cancer. METHODS: From 1997 to 2013, a total of 96 patients who underwent curative intent surgery for middle and distal bile duct cancer were identified. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of operation; 20 patients were included in the BDR group and 76 patients were in the PD group. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The number of lymph nodes (LNs) was significantly greater in patients within the PD group compared to the BDR group. The total number of LNs was 6.5 ± 8.2 vs. 11.2 ± 8.2 (P = 0.017) and the number of metastatic LNs was 0.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.0 ± 1.5 (P = 0.021), respectively. After a median follow-up period of 24 months (range, 4–169 months), the recurrence-free survival of the PD group was superior to that of the BDR group (P = 0.035). In the patients with LN metastases, the patients undergoing PD had significantly better survival than the BDR group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be cautious in deciding to perform BDR for middle and distal common bile duct cancer. PD is recommended if LN metastases are suspected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5931934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Surgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59319342018-05-04 Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer Kim, Naru Lee, Huisong Min, Seog Ki Lee, Hyeon Kook Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: To compare survival outcomes between bile duct segmental resection (BDR) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for the treatment of middle and distal bile duct cancer. METHODS: From 1997 to 2013, a total of 96 patients who underwent curative intent surgery for middle and distal bile duct cancer were identified. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of operation; 20 patients were included in the BDR group and 76 patients were in the PD group. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The number of lymph nodes (LNs) was significantly greater in patients within the PD group compared to the BDR group. The total number of LNs was 6.5 ± 8.2 vs. 11.2 ± 8.2 (P = 0.017) and the number of metastatic LNs was 0.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.0 ± 1.5 (P = 0.021), respectively. After a median follow-up period of 24 months (range, 4–169 months), the recurrence-free survival of the PD group was superior to that of the BDR group (P = 0.035). In the patients with LN metastases, the patients undergoing PD had significantly better survival than the BDR group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be cautious in deciding to perform BDR for middle and distal common bile duct cancer. PD is recommended if LN metastases are suspected. The Korean Surgical Society 2018-05 2018-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5931934/ /pubmed/29732355 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2018.94.5.240 Text en Copyright © 2018, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Naru
Lee, Huisong
Min, Seog Ki
Lee, Hyeon Kook
Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer
title Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer
title_full Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer
title_fullStr Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer
title_full_unstemmed Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer
title_short Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer
title_sort bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732355
http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2018.94.5.240
work_keys_str_mv AT kimnaru bileductsegmentalresectionversuspancreatoduodenectomyformiddleanddistalcommonbileductcancer
AT leehuisong bileductsegmentalresectionversuspancreatoduodenectomyformiddleanddistalcommonbileductcancer
AT minseogki bileductsegmentalresectionversuspancreatoduodenectomyformiddleanddistalcommonbileductcancer
AT leehyeonkook bileductsegmentalresectionversuspancreatoduodenectomyformiddleanddistalcommonbileductcancer