Cargando…
Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer
PURPOSE: To compare survival outcomes between bile duct segmental resection (BDR) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for the treatment of middle and distal bile duct cancer. METHODS: From 1997 to 2013, a total of 96 patients who underwent curative intent surgery for middle and distal bile duct cancer we...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Surgical Society
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732355 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2018.94.5.240 |
_version_ | 1783319721380151296 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Naru Lee, Huisong Min, Seog Ki Lee, Hyeon Kook |
author_facet | Kim, Naru Lee, Huisong Min, Seog Ki Lee, Hyeon Kook |
author_sort | Kim, Naru |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare survival outcomes between bile duct segmental resection (BDR) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for the treatment of middle and distal bile duct cancer. METHODS: From 1997 to 2013, a total of 96 patients who underwent curative intent surgery for middle and distal bile duct cancer were identified. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of operation; 20 patients were included in the BDR group and 76 patients were in the PD group. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The number of lymph nodes (LNs) was significantly greater in patients within the PD group compared to the BDR group. The total number of LNs was 6.5 ± 8.2 vs. 11.2 ± 8.2 (P = 0.017) and the number of metastatic LNs was 0.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.0 ± 1.5 (P = 0.021), respectively. After a median follow-up period of 24 months (range, 4–169 months), the recurrence-free survival of the PD group was superior to that of the BDR group (P = 0.035). In the patients with LN metastases, the patients undergoing PD had significantly better survival than the BDR group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be cautious in deciding to perform BDR for middle and distal common bile duct cancer. PD is recommended if LN metastases are suspected. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5931934 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Korean Surgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59319342018-05-04 Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer Kim, Naru Lee, Huisong Min, Seog Ki Lee, Hyeon Kook Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: To compare survival outcomes between bile duct segmental resection (BDR) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for the treatment of middle and distal bile duct cancer. METHODS: From 1997 to 2013, a total of 96 patients who underwent curative intent surgery for middle and distal bile duct cancer were identified. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of operation; 20 patients were included in the BDR group and 76 patients were in the PD group. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The number of lymph nodes (LNs) was significantly greater in patients within the PD group compared to the BDR group. The total number of LNs was 6.5 ± 8.2 vs. 11.2 ± 8.2 (P = 0.017) and the number of metastatic LNs was 0.4 ± 0.9 vs. 1.0 ± 1.5 (P = 0.021), respectively. After a median follow-up period of 24 months (range, 4–169 months), the recurrence-free survival of the PD group was superior to that of the BDR group (P = 0.035). In the patients with LN metastases, the patients undergoing PD had significantly better survival than the BDR group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Surgeons should be cautious in deciding to perform BDR for middle and distal common bile duct cancer. PD is recommended if LN metastases are suspected. The Korean Surgical Society 2018-05 2018-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5931934/ /pubmed/29732355 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2018.94.5.240 Text en Copyright © 2018, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kim, Naru Lee, Huisong Min, Seog Ki Lee, Hyeon Kook Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer |
title | Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer |
title_full | Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer |
title_fullStr | Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer |
title_short | Bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer |
title_sort | bile duct segmental resection versus pancreatoduodenectomy for middle and distal common bile duct cancer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5931934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29732355 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2018.94.5.240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimnaru bileductsegmentalresectionversuspancreatoduodenectomyformiddleanddistalcommonbileductcancer AT leehuisong bileductsegmentalresectionversuspancreatoduodenectomyformiddleanddistalcommonbileductcancer AT minseogki bileductsegmentalresectionversuspancreatoduodenectomyformiddleanddistalcommonbileductcancer AT leehyeonkook bileductsegmentalresectionversuspancreatoduodenectomyformiddleanddistalcommonbileductcancer |