Cargando…
Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients
BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate the role of the Neurological Assessment of Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale in predicting the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma, and compare these results to predicted data of the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and Eastern Cooperative Oncol...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Brain Tumor Society; The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology; The Korean Society for Pediatric Neuro-Oncology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5932296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29644808 http://dx.doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2018.6.e1 |
_version_ | 1783319782092701696 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jiwook Park, Sung Hyun Kim, Young Zoon |
author_facet | Lee, Jiwook Park, Sung Hyun Kim, Young Zoon |
author_sort | Lee, Jiwook |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate the role of the Neurological Assessment of Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale in predicting the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma, and compare these results to predicted data of the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)/World Health Organization (WHO) performance status. Additionally, we examined other prognostic factors in glioblastoma patients. METHODS: The medical records of 76 patients with a new diagnosis of histologically ascertained glioblastoma in the period from January 2002 to December 2015 at the authors' institution were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical factors, including epidemiologic, radiologic, and therapeutic values were reviewed as well as the performance status assessed by the KPS, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale. RESULTS: The mean overall survival was 19.8 months (95% confidence interval 15.2–25.4 months). At initial diagnosis, the mean value [±standard deviation (SD)] of KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 81 (±7.4), 1.3 (±0.6), and 7.3 (±3.8), respectively. Multivariate analysis for predicting survival showed odds ratios of KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 2.502 (≥80 vs. <80; p=0.024), 1.691 (0–1 vs. 2–5; p=0.047), and 2.763 (0–7 vs. 8–23; p=0.020), respectively. At the time of progression, the mean value (±SD) of KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 69 (±8.2), 1.6 (±0.7), and 11.4 (±4.2), respectively; multivariate analysis for predicting survival showed that the odd ratios for KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 2.007 (≥80 vs. <80; p=0.035), 1.321 (0–1 vs. 2–5; p=0.143), and 3.182 (0–7 vs. 8–23; p=0.002), respectively. CONCLUSION: The NANO scale provided a more detailed and objective measure of neurologic function than that currently used for predicting the prognosis of glioblastoma patients, especially at the time of progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5932296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Korean Brain Tumor Society; The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology; The Korean Society for Pediatric Neuro-Oncology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59322962018-05-07 Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients Lee, Jiwook Park, Sung Hyun Kim, Young Zoon Brain Tumor Res Treat Original Article BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate the role of the Neurological Assessment of Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale in predicting the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma, and compare these results to predicted data of the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)/World Health Organization (WHO) performance status. Additionally, we examined other prognostic factors in glioblastoma patients. METHODS: The medical records of 76 patients with a new diagnosis of histologically ascertained glioblastoma in the period from January 2002 to December 2015 at the authors' institution were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical factors, including epidemiologic, radiologic, and therapeutic values were reviewed as well as the performance status assessed by the KPS, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale. RESULTS: The mean overall survival was 19.8 months (95% confidence interval 15.2–25.4 months). At initial diagnosis, the mean value [±standard deviation (SD)] of KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 81 (±7.4), 1.3 (±0.6), and 7.3 (±3.8), respectively. Multivariate analysis for predicting survival showed odds ratios of KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 2.502 (≥80 vs. <80; p=0.024), 1.691 (0–1 vs. 2–5; p=0.047), and 2.763 (0–7 vs. 8–23; p=0.020), respectively. At the time of progression, the mean value (±SD) of KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 69 (±8.2), 1.6 (±0.7), and 11.4 (±4.2), respectively; multivariate analysis for predicting survival showed that the odd ratios for KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 2.007 (≥80 vs. <80; p=0.035), 1.321 (0–1 vs. 2–5; p=0.143), and 3.182 (0–7 vs. 8–23; p=0.002), respectively. CONCLUSION: The NANO scale provided a more detailed and objective measure of neurologic function than that currently used for predicting the prognosis of glioblastoma patients, especially at the time of progression. The Korean Brain Tumor Society; The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology; The Korean Society for Pediatric Neuro-Oncology 2018-04 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5932296/ /pubmed/29644808 http://dx.doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2018.6.e1 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Brain Tumor Society, The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology, and The Korean Society for Pediatric Neuro-Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, Jiwook Park, Sung Hyun Kim, Young Zoon Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients |
title | Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients |
title_full | Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients |
title_short | Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients |
title_sort | prognostic evaluation of neurological assessment of the neuro-oncology scale in glioblastoma patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5932296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29644808 http://dx.doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2018.6.e1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejiwook prognosticevaluationofneurologicalassessmentoftheneurooncologyscaleinglioblastomapatients AT parksunghyun prognosticevaluationofneurologicalassessmentoftheneurooncologyscaleinglioblastomapatients AT kimyoungzoon prognosticevaluationofneurologicalassessmentoftheneurooncologyscaleinglioblastomapatients |