Cargando…

Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate the role of the Neurological Assessment of Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale in predicting the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma, and compare these results to predicted data of the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and Eastern Cooperative Oncol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jiwook, Park, Sung Hyun, Kim, Young Zoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Brain Tumor Society; The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology; The Korean Society for Pediatric Neuro-Oncology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5932296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29644808
http://dx.doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2018.6.e1
_version_ 1783319782092701696
author Lee, Jiwook
Park, Sung Hyun
Kim, Young Zoon
author_facet Lee, Jiwook
Park, Sung Hyun
Kim, Young Zoon
author_sort Lee, Jiwook
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate the role of the Neurological Assessment of Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale in predicting the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma, and compare these results to predicted data of the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)/World Health Organization (WHO) performance status. Additionally, we examined other prognostic factors in glioblastoma patients. METHODS: The medical records of 76 patients with a new diagnosis of histologically ascertained glioblastoma in the period from January 2002 to December 2015 at the authors' institution were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical factors, including epidemiologic, radiologic, and therapeutic values were reviewed as well as the performance status assessed by the KPS, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale. RESULTS: The mean overall survival was 19.8 months (95% confidence interval 15.2–25.4 months). At initial diagnosis, the mean value [±standard deviation (SD)] of KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 81 (±7.4), 1.3 (±0.6), and 7.3 (±3.8), respectively. Multivariate analysis for predicting survival showed odds ratios of KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 2.502 (≥80 vs. <80; p=0.024), 1.691 (0–1 vs. 2–5; p=0.047), and 2.763 (0–7 vs. 8–23; p=0.020), respectively. At the time of progression, the mean value (±SD) of KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 69 (±8.2), 1.6 (±0.7), and 11.4 (±4.2), respectively; multivariate analysis for predicting survival showed that the odd ratios for KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 2.007 (≥80 vs. <80; p=0.035), 1.321 (0–1 vs. 2–5; p=0.143), and 3.182 (0–7 vs. 8–23; p=0.002), respectively. CONCLUSION: The NANO scale provided a more detailed and objective measure of neurologic function than that currently used for predicting the prognosis of glioblastoma patients, especially at the time of progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5932296
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Korean Brain Tumor Society; The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology; The Korean Society for Pediatric Neuro-Oncology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59322962018-05-07 Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients Lee, Jiwook Park, Sung Hyun Kim, Young Zoon Brain Tumor Res Treat Original Article BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to investigate the role of the Neurological Assessment of Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale in predicting the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma, and compare these results to predicted data of the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG)/World Health Organization (WHO) performance status. Additionally, we examined other prognostic factors in glioblastoma patients. METHODS: The medical records of 76 patients with a new diagnosis of histologically ascertained glioblastoma in the period from January 2002 to December 2015 at the authors' institution were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical factors, including epidemiologic, radiologic, and therapeutic values were reviewed as well as the performance status assessed by the KPS, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale. RESULTS: The mean overall survival was 19.8 months (95% confidence interval 15.2–25.4 months). At initial diagnosis, the mean value [±standard deviation (SD)] of KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 81 (±7.4), 1.3 (±0.6), and 7.3 (±3.8), respectively. Multivariate analysis for predicting survival showed odds ratios of KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 2.502 (≥80 vs. <80; p=0.024), 1.691 (0–1 vs. 2–5; p=0.047), and 2.763 (0–7 vs. 8–23; p=0.020), respectively. At the time of progression, the mean value (±SD) of KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 69 (±8.2), 1.6 (±0.7), and 11.4 (±4.2), respectively; multivariate analysis for predicting survival showed that the odd ratios for KPS score, ECOG/WHO performance status, and NANO scale were 2.007 (≥80 vs. <80; p=0.035), 1.321 (0–1 vs. 2–5; p=0.143), and 3.182 (0–7 vs. 8–23; p=0.002), respectively. CONCLUSION: The NANO scale provided a more detailed and objective measure of neurologic function than that currently used for predicting the prognosis of glioblastoma patients, especially at the time of progression. The Korean Brain Tumor Society; The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology; The Korean Society for Pediatric Neuro-Oncology 2018-04 2018-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5932296/ /pubmed/29644808 http://dx.doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2018.6.e1 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Korean Brain Tumor Society, The Korean Society for Neuro-Oncology, and The Korean Society for Pediatric Neuro-Oncology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Jiwook
Park, Sung Hyun
Kim, Young Zoon
Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients
title Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients
title_full Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients
title_fullStr Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients
title_short Prognostic Evaluation of Neurological Assessment of the Neuro-Oncology Scale in Glioblastoma Patients
title_sort prognostic evaluation of neurological assessment of the neuro-oncology scale in glioblastoma patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5932296/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29644808
http://dx.doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2018.6.e1
work_keys_str_mv AT leejiwook prognosticevaluationofneurologicalassessmentoftheneurooncologyscaleinglioblastomapatients
AT parksunghyun prognosticevaluationofneurologicalassessmentoftheneurooncologyscaleinglioblastomapatients
AT kimyoungzoon prognosticevaluationofneurologicalassessmentoftheneurooncologyscaleinglioblastomapatients