Cargando…
The Effect of California’s Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening
Purpose: Half of US states mandate women be notified if they have dense breasts on their mammogram, yet guidelines and data on supplemental screening modalities are limited. Breast density (BD) refers to the extent that breast tissue appears radiographically dense on mammograms. High BD reduces the...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5932660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150131916674889 |
_version_ | 1783319852028526592 |
---|---|
author | Chau, Stephanie Lynn Alabaster, Amy Luikart, Karin Brenman, Leslie Manace Habel, Laurel A. |
author_facet | Chau, Stephanie Lynn Alabaster, Amy Luikart, Karin Brenman, Leslie Manace Habel, Laurel A. |
author_sort | Chau, Stephanie Lynn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose: Half of US states mandate women be notified if they have dense breasts on their mammogram, yet guidelines and data on supplemental screening modalities are limited. Breast density (BD) refers to the extent that breast tissue appears radiographically dense on mammograms. High BD reduces the sensitivity of screening mammography and increases breast cancer risk. The aim of this study was to determine the potential impact of California’s 2013 BD notification legislation on breast cancer screening patterns. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of women aged 40 to 74 years who were members of a large Northern California integrated health plan (approximately 3.9 million members) in 2011-2015. We calculated pre- and post-legislation rates of screening mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We also examined whether women with dense breasts (defined as BI-RADS density c or d) had higher MRI rates than women with nondense breasts (defined as BI-RADS density a or b). Results: After adjustment for race/ethnicity, age, body mass index, medical facility, neighborhood median income, and cancer history, there was a relative 6.6% decrease (relative risk [RR] 0.934, confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.95) in the rate of screening mammography, largely driven by a decrease among women <50 years. While infrequent, there was a relative 16% increase (RR 1.16, CI 1.07-1.25) in the rate of screening MRI, with the greatest increase among the youngest women. In the postlegislation period, women with extremely dense breasts (BI-RADS d) had 2.77 times (CI 1.93-3.95) the odds of a MRI within 9 months of a screening mammogram compared with women with nondense breasts (BI-RADS b). Conclusions: In this setting, MRI rates increased in the postlegislation period. In addition, women with higher BD were more likely to have supplementary MRI. The decrease in mammography rates seen primarily among younger women may have been due to changes in national screening guidelines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5932660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59326602018-05-07 The Effect of California’s Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening Chau, Stephanie Lynn Alabaster, Amy Luikart, Karin Brenman, Leslie Manace Habel, Laurel A. J Prim Care Community Health Original Research Purpose: Half of US states mandate women be notified if they have dense breasts on their mammogram, yet guidelines and data on supplemental screening modalities are limited. Breast density (BD) refers to the extent that breast tissue appears radiographically dense on mammograms. High BD reduces the sensitivity of screening mammography and increases breast cancer risk. The aim of this study was to determine the potential impact of California’s 2013 BD notification legislation on breast cancer screening patterns. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of women aged 40 to 74 years who were members of a large Northern California integrated health plan (approximately 3.9 million members) in 2011-2015. We calculated pre- and post-legislation rates of screening mammography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We also examined whether women with dense breasts (defined as BI-RADS density c or d) had higher MRI rates than women with nondense breasts (defined as BI-RADS density a or b). Results: After adjustment for race/ethnicity, age, body mass index, medical facility, neighborhood median income, and cancer history, there was a relative 6.6% decrease (relative risk [RR] 0.934, confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.95) in the rate of screening mammography, largely driven by a decrease among women <50 years. While infrequent, there was a relative 16% increase (RR 1.16, CI 1.07-1.25) in the rate of screening MRI, with the greatest increase among the youngest women. In the postlegislation period, women with extremely dense breasts (BI-RADS d) had 2.77 times (CI 1.93-3.95) the odds of a MRI within 9 months of a screening mammogram compared with women with nondense breasts (BI-RADS b). Conclusions: In this setting, MRI rates increased in the postlegislation period. In addition, women with higher BD were more likely to have supplementary MRI. The decrease in mammography rates seen primarily among younger women may have been due to changes in national screening guidelines. SAGE Publications 2016-10-31 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5932660/ /pubmed/27799412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150131916674889 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Chau, Stephanie Lynn Alabaster, Amy Luikart, Karin Brenman, Leslie Manace Habel, Laurel A. The Effect of California’s Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening |
title | The Effect of California’s Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening |
title_full | The Effect of California’s Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening |
title_fullStr | The Effect of California’s Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of California’s Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening |
title_short | The Effect of California’s Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening |
title_sort | effect of california’s breast density notification legislation on breast cancer screening |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5932660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2150131916674889 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaustephanielynn theeffectofcaliforniasbreastdensitynotificationlegislationonbreastcancerscreening AT alabasteramy theeffectofcaliforniasbreastdensitynotificationlegislationonbreastcancerscreening AT luikartkarin theeffectofcaliforniasbreastdensitynotificationlegislationonbreastcancerscreening AT brenmanlesliemanace theeffectofcaliforniasbreastdensitynotificationlegislationonbreastcancerscreening AT habellaurela theeffectofcaliforniasbreastdensitynotificationlegislationonbreastcancerscreening AT chaustephanielynn effectofcaliforniasbreastdensitynotificationlegislationonbreastcancerscreening AT alabasteramy effectofcaliforniasbreastdensitynotificationlegislationonbreastcancerscreening AT luikartkarin effectofcaliforniasbreastdensitynotificationlegislationonbreastcancerscreening AT brenmanlesliemanace effectofcaliforniasbreastdensitynotificationlegislationonbreastcancerscreening AT habellaurela effectofcaliforniasbreastdensitynotificationlegislationonbreastcancerscreening |