Cargando…

Why the history of public consultation matters for contemporary health policy

Contemporary policy debates construct public involvement in England’s National Health Service as “new,” or as a practice dating back only as far as the 1990s. This article argues that the longer historical contexts of such consultative practice matter, and it explores various and shifting manifestat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Crane, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pergamon Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5933525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29433759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2018.01.001
_version_ 1783319974182387712
author Crane, Jennifer
author_facet Crane, Jennifer
author_sort Crane, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description Contemporary policy debates construct public involvement in England’s National Health Service as “new,” or as a practice dating back only as far as the 1990s. This article argues that the longer historical contexts of such consultative practice matter, and it explores various and shifting manifestations of “consultation” in the NHS from the foundation of the Service in 1948. In doing so, it first demonstrates that consultation has always been a part of the theory and practice of postwar health policy. Thinking about consultation as “new” presents such practice as unnecessary or transient, and may function as part of a damaging political vision of public affection for the NHS as a barrier to reform. Second, the article asserts that public interest in shaping NHS practice and policy has never been fully satisfied by official consultative mechanisms. “The public” is not a homogeneous group, but rather composed of various groups, communities, and individuals with rich perspectives and histories to share, having experienced the NHS as patients, friends, supporters, staff, and volunteers. Policy-makers should approach diverse publics as partners, and should meaningfully listen to protests around NHS reform, which often reflect public investment in the NHS, as well as valid concerns about how particular communities will be able to access health care. While the political will for such engagement has varied over time, individual politicians and local-level health agencies can make a difference by supporting, engaging with, and funding organizations which represent and empower a diverse range of communities: such groups have always, and will continue to play, a significant role in shaping NHS debate and care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5933525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Pergamon Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59335252018-05-07 Why the history of public consultation matters for contemporary health policy Crane, Jennifer Endeavour Article Contemporary policy debates construct public involvement in England’s National Health Service as “new,” or as a practice dating back only as far as the 1990s. This article argues that the longer historical contexts of such consultative practice matter, and it explores various and shifting manifestations of “consultation” in the NHS from the foundation of the Service in 1948. In doing so, it first demonstrates that consultation has always been a part of the theory and practice of postwar health policy. Thinking about consultation as “new” presents such practice as unnecessary or transient, and may function as part of a damaging political vision of public affection for the NHS as a barrier to reform. Second, the article asserts that public interest in shaping NHS practice and policy has never been fully satisfied by official consultative mechanisms. “The public” is not a homogeneous group, but rather composed of various groups, communities, and individuals with rich perspectives and histories to share, having experienced the NHS as patients, friends, supporters, staff, and volunteers. Policy-makers should approach diverse publics as partners, and should meaningfully listen to protests around NHS reform, which often reflect public investment in the NHS, as well as valid concerns about how particular communities will be able to access health care. While the political will for such engagement has varied over time, individual politicians and local-level health agencies can make a difference by supporting, engaging with, and funding organizations which represent and empower a diverse range of communities: such groups have always, and will continue to play, a significant role in shaping NHS debate and care. Pergamon Press 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5933525/ /pubmed/29433759 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2018.01.001 Text en © 2018 The Author http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Crane, Jennifer
Why the history of public consultation matters for contemporary health policy
title Why the history of public consultation matters for contemporary health policy
title_full Why the history of public consultation matters for contemporary health policy
title_fullStr Why the history of public consultation matters for contemporary health policy
title_full_unstemmed Why the history of public consultation matters for contemporary health policy
title_short Why the history of public consultation matters for contemporary health policy
title_sort why the history of public consultation matters for contemporary health policy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5933525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29433759
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2018.01.001
work_keys_str_mv AT cranejennifer whythehistoryofpublicconsultationmattersforcontemporaryhealthpolicy