Cargando…
Ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder compared with nebulized tobramycin and colistimethate sodium: a crossover study in cystic fibrosis patients with pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection
BACKGROUND: This study assessed the ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP) administered via T-326 inhaler versus tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) and colistimethate sodium (COLI), both administered via nebulizers, for the treatment of chronic pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5933634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28614995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753465817710596 |
_version_ | 1783319983378399232 |
---|---|
author | Greenwood, James Schwarz, Carsten Sommerwerck, Urte Nash, Edward F Tamm, Michael Cao, Weihua Mastoridis, Paul Debonnett, Laurie Hamed, Kamal |
author_facet | Greenwood, James Schwarz, Carsten Sommerwerck, Urte Nash, Edward F Tamm, Michael Cao, Weihua Mastoridis, Paul Debonnett, Laurie Hamed, Kamal |
author_sort | Greenwood, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study assessed the ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP) administered via T-326 inhaler versus tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) and colistimethate sodium (COLI), both administered via nebulizers, for the treatment of chronic pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: A real-world, open-label, crossover, interventional phase IV study was conducted in CF patients aged ⩾6 years with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) ⩾25% to ⩽90% predicted. Patients were assigned to one of the three treatment arms in Cycle 1; all patients received TIP in Cycle 2. Each cycle consisted of 28 days on and 28 days off the treatment. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients [mean (standard deviation) age, 27.6 (8.4) years] were allocated to three treatment arms [TIS/TIP (n = 14); COLI/TIP (n = 28); TIP/TIP (n = 18)] in Cycle 1. The mean total administration time, which included device setup and cleaning, in Cycle 1 versus Cycle 2 for TIS/TIP, COLI/TIP, and TIP/TIP arms were 37.0 versus 5.0 min, 16.4 versus 3.8 min, and 4.2 versus 3.4 min, respectively. The difference in mean total administration time was significantly shorter in Cycle 2 than in Cycle 1 for TIS/TIP (p = 0.0112) and COLI/TIP (p = 0.0016) arms. Overall, 12 patients were found to have contaminated devices across the two treatment cycles. In the TIP/TIP arm, no contamination of the T-326 inhaler was observed in either cycle. Treatment satisfaction, assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication and ACCEPT® questionnaire, was better overall for TIP compared with TIS and COLI. There were no unexpected adverse events and most were mild or moderate in intensity. CONCLUSION: The T-326 inhaler used to deliver TIP was easy to use, required shorter total administration time, and was much less frequently contaminated than the nebulizers. The safety findings observed for TIP were generally consistent with its established safety profile. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5933634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59336342018-05-09 Ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder compared with nebulized tobramycin and colistimethate sodium: a crossover study in cystic fibrosis patients with pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection Greenwood, James Schwarz, Carsten Sommerwerck, Urte Nash, Edward F Tamm, Michael Cao, Weihua Mastoridis, Paul Debonnett, Laurie Hamed, Kamal Ther Adv Respir Dis Original Research BACKGROUND: This study assessed the ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder (TIP) administered via T-326 inhaler versus tobramycin inhalation solution (TIS) and colistimethate sodium (COLI), both administered via nebulizers, for the treatment of chronic pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS: A real-world, open-label, crossover, interventional phase IV study was conducted in CF patients aged ⩾6 years with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) ⩾25% to ⩽90% predicted. Patients were assigned to one of the three treatment arms in Cycle 1; all patients received TIP in Cycle 2. Each cycle consisted of 28 days on and 28 days off the treatment. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients [mean (standard deviation) age, 27.6 (8.4) years] were allocated to three treatment arms [TIS/TIP (n = 14); COLI/TIP (n = 28); TIP/TIP (n = 18)] in Cycle 1. The mean total administration time, which included device setup and cleaning, in Cycle 1 versus Cycle 2 for TIS/TIP, COLI/TIP, and TIP/TIP arms were 37.0 versus 5.0 min, 16.4 versus 3.8 min, and 4.2 versus 3.4 min, respectively. The difference in mean total administration time was significantly shorter in Cycle 2 than in Cycle 1 for TIS/TIP (p = 0.0112) and COLI/TIP (p = 0.0016) arms. Overall, 12 patients were found to have contaminated devices across the two treatment cycles. In the TIP/TIP arm, no contamination of the T-326 inhaler was observed in either cycle. Treatment satisfaction, assessed by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication and ACCEPT® questionnaire, was better overall for TIP compared with TIS and COLI. There were no unexpected adverse events and most were mild or moderate in intensity. CONCLUSION: The T-326 inhaler used to deliver TIP was easy to use, required shorter total administration time, and was much less frequently contaminated than the nebulizers. The safety findings observed for TIP were generally consistent with its established safety profile. SAGE Publications 2017-06-14 2017-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5933634/ /pubmed/28614995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753465817710596 Text en © The Author(s), 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Greenwood, James Schwarz, Carsten Sommerwerck, Urte Nash, Edward F Tamm, Michael Cao, Weihua Mastoridis, Paul Debonnett, Laurie Hamed, Kamal Ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder compared with nebulized tobramycin and colistimethate sodium: a crossover study in cystic fibrosis patients with pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection |
title | Ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder compared with nebulized
tobramycin and colistimethate sodium: a crossover study in cystic fibrosis
patients with pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa
infection |
title_full | Ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder compared with nebulized
tobramycin and colistimethate sodium: a crossover study in cystic fibrosis
patients with pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa
infection |
title_fullStr | Ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder compared with nebulized
tobramycin and colistimethate sodium: a crossover study in cystic fibrosis
patients with pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa
infection |
title_full_unstemmed | Ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder compared with nebulized
tobramycin and colistimethate sodium: a crossover study in cystic fibrosis
patients with pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa
infection |
title_short | Ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder compared with nebulized
tobramycin and colistimethate sodium: a crossover study in cystic fibrosis
patients with pulmonary Pseudomonas aeruginosa
infection |
title_sort | ease of use of tobramycin inhalation powder compared with nebulized
tobramycin and colistimethate sodium: a crossover study in cystic fibrosis
patients with pulmonary pseudomonas aeruginosa
infection |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5933634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28614995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753465817710596 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenwoodjames easeofuseoftobramycininhalationpowdercomparedwithnebulizedtobramycinandcolistimethatesodiumacrossoverstudyincysticfibrosispatientswithpulmonarypseudomonasaeruginosainfection AT schwarzcarsten easeofuseoftobramycininhalationpowdercomparedwithnebulizedtobramycinandcolistimethatesodiumacrossoverstudyincysticfibrosispatientswithpulmonarypseudomonasaeruginosainfection AT sommerwerckurte easeofuseoftobramycininhalationpowdercomparedwithnebulizedtobramycinandcolistimethatesodiumacrossoverstudyincysticfibrosispatientswithpulmonarypseudomonasaeruginosainfection AT nashedwardf easeofuseoftobramycininhalationpowdercomparedwithnebulizedtobramycinandcolistimethatesodiumacrossoverstudyincysticfibrosispatientswithpulmonarypseudomonasaeruginosainfection AT tammmichael easeofuseoftobramycininhalationpowdercomparedwithnebulizedtobramycinandcolistimethatesodiumacrossoverstudyincysticfibrosispatientswithpulmonarypseudomonasaeruginosainfection AT caoweihua easeofuseoftobramycininhalationpowdercomparedwithnebulizedtobramycinandcolistimethatesodiumacrossoverstudyincysticfibrosispatientswithpulmonarypseudomonasaeruginosainfection AT mastoridispaul easeofuseoftobramycininhalationpowdercomparedwithnebulizedtobramycinandcolistimethatesodiumacrossoverstudyincysticfibrosispatientswithpulmonarypseudomonasaeruginosainfection AT debonnettlaurie easeofuseoftobramycininhalationpowdercomparedwithnebulizedtobramycinandcolistimethatesodiumacrossoverstudyincysticfibrosispatientswithpulmonarypseudomonasaeruginosainfection AT hamedkamal easeofuseoftobramycininhalationpowdercomparedwithnebulizedtobramycinandcolistimethatesodiumacrossoverstudyincysticfibrosispatientswithpulmonarypseudomonasaeruginosainfection |