Cargando…

Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. METHODS: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of 281±15.6 kg, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per trea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Ming, Chen, Zhiqiang, Wei, Shengjuan, Geng, Guangduo, Yan, Peishi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5933983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29268584
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0538
_version_ 1783320038536642560
author Wei, Ming
Chen, Zhiqiang
Wei, Shengjuan
Geng, Guangduo
Yan, Peishi
author_facet Wei, Ming
Chen, Zhiqiang
Wei, Shengjuan
Geng, Guangduo
Yan, Peishi
author_sort Wei, Ming
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. METHODS: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of 281±15.6 kg, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per treatment in a randomized complete block design. Five dietary treatments included group 1 with corn silage only diet, group 2 with corn silage-concentrate basal diet (BD) and 3 groups with 3 test diets, which were the BD partly substituted by corn silage at 10%, 30%, and 60%. The total collection digestion trial was conducted for 5 d for each block after a 10-d adaptation period, and then an open-circuit respiratory cage was used to measure the gas exchange of each animal in a consecutive 4-d period. RESULTS: The direct method-derived metabolizable energy and net energy of corn silage were 8.86 and 5.15 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), expressed as net energy requirement for maintenance and gain were 5.28 and 2.90 MJ/kg DM, respectively; the corresponding regression method-derived estimates were 8.96, 5.34, 5.37, and 2.98 MJ/kg DM, respectively. The direct method-derived estimates were not different (p>0.05) from those obtained using the regression method. Using substitution method, the nutrient apparent digestibility and effective energy values of corn silage varied with the increased corn silage substitution ratio (p<0.05). In addition, the corn silage estimates at the substitution ratio of 30% were similar to those estimated by direct and regression methods. CONCLUSION: In determining the energy value of corn silage using substitution method, there was a discrepancy between different substitution ratios, and the substitution ratio of 30% was more appropriate than 10% or 60% in the current study. The regression method based on multiple point substitution was more appropriate than single point substitution on energy evaluation of feedstuffs for beef cattle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5933983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59339832018-06-01 Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle Wei, Ming Chen, Zhiqiang Wei, Shengjuan Geng, Guangduo Yan, Peishi Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. METHODS: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of 281±15.6 kg, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per treatment in a randomized complete block design. Five dietary treatments included group 1 with corn silage only diet, group 2 with corn silage-concentrate basal diet (BD) and 3 groups with 3 test diets, which were the BD partly substituted by corn silage at 10%, 30%, and 60%. The total collection digestion trial was conducted for 5 d for each block after a 10-d adaptation period, and then an open-circuit respiratory cage was used to measure the gas exchange of each animal in a consecutive 4-d period. RESULTS: The direct method-derived metabolizable energy and net energy of corn silage were 8.86 and 5.15 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), expressed as net energy requirement for maintenance and gain were 5.28 and 2.90 MJ/kg DM, respectively; the corresponding regression method-derived estimates were 8.96, 5.34, 5.37, and 2.98 MJ/kg DM, respectively. The direct method-derived estimates were not different (p>0.05) from those obtained using the regression method. Using substitution method, the nutrient apparent digestibility and effective energy values of corn silage varied with the increased corn silage substitution ratio (p<0.05). In addition, the corn silage estimates at the substitution ratio of 30% were similar to those estimated by direct and regression methods. CONCLUSION: In determining the energy value of corn silage using substitution method, there was a discrepancy between different substitution ratios, and the substitution ratio of 30% was more appropriate than 10% or 60% in the current study. The regression method based on multiple point substitution was more appropriate than single point substitution on energy evaluation of feedstuffs for beef cattle. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2018-06 2017-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5933983/ /pubmed/29268584 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0538 Text en Copyright © 2018 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Wei, Ming
Chen, Zhiqiang
Wei, Shengjuan
Geng, Guangduo
Yan, Peishi
Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle
title Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle
title_full Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle
title_fullStr Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle
title_full_unstemmed Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle
title_short Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle
title_sort comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5933983/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29268584
http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0538
work_keys_str_mv AT weiming comparisonamongmethodsofeffectiveenergyevaluationofcornsilageforbeefcattle
AT chenzhiqiang comparisonamongmethodsofeffectiveenergyevaluationofcornsilageforbeefcattle
AT weishengjuan comparisonamongmethodsofeffectiveenergyevaluationofcornsilageforbeefcattle
AT gengguangduo comparisonamongmethodsofeffectiveenergyevaluationofcornsilageforbeefcattle
AT yanpeishi comparisonamongmethodsofeffectiveenergyevaluationofcornsilageforbeefcattle