Cargando…
Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. METHODS: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of 281±15.6 kg, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per trea...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5933983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29268584 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0538 |
_version_ | 1783320038536642560 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Ming Chen, Zhiqiang Wei, Shengjuan Geng, Guangduo Yan, Peishi |
author_facet | Wei, Ming Chen, Zhiqiang Wei, Shengjuan Geng, Guangduo Yan, Peishi |
author_sort | Wei, Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. METHODS: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of 281±15.6 kg, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per treatment in a randomized complete block design. Five dietary treatments included group 1 with corn silage only diet, group 2 with corn silage-concentrate basal diet (BD) and 3 groups with 3 test diets, which were the BD partly substituted by corn silage at 10%, 30%, and 60%. The total collection digestion trial was conducted for 5 d for each block after a 10-d adaptation period, and then an open-circuit respiratory cage was used to measure the gas exchange of each animal in a consecutive 4-d period. RESULTS: The direct method-derived metabolizable energy and net energy of corn silage were 8.86 and 5.15 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), expressed as net energy requirement for maintenance and gain were 5.28 and 2.90 MJ/kg DM, respectively; the corresponding regression method-derived estimates were 8.96, 5.34, 5.37, and 2.98 MJ/kg DM, respectively. The direct method-derived estimates were not different (p>0.05) from those obtained using the regression method. Using substitution method, the nutrient apparent digestibility and effective energy values of corn silage varied with the increased corn silage substitution ratio (p<0.05). In addition, the corn silage estimates at the substitution ratio of 30% were similar to those estimated by direct and regression methods. CONCLUSION: In determining the energy value of corn silage using substitution method, there was a discrepancy between different substitution ratios, and the substitution ratio of 30% was more appropriate than 10% or 60% in the current study. The regression method based on multiple point substitution was more appropriate than single point substitution on energy evaluation of feedstuffs for beef cattle. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5933983 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59339832018-06-01 Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle Wei, Ming Chen, Zhiqiang Wei, Shengjuan Geng, Guangduo Yan, Peishi Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. METHODS: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of 281±15.6 kg, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per treatment in a randomized complete block design. Five dietary treatments included group 1 with corn silage only diet, group 2 with corn silage-concentrate basal diet (BD) and 3 groups with 3 test diets, which were the BD partly substituted by corn silage at 10%, 30%, and 60%. The total collection digestion trial was conducted for 5 d for each block after a 10-d adaptation period, and then an open-circuit respiratory cage was used to measure the gas exchange of each animal in a consecutive 4-d period. RESULTS: The direct method-derived metabolizable energy and net energy of corn silage were 8.86 and 5.15 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), expressed as net energy requirement for maintenance and gain were 5.28 and 2.90 MJ/kg DM, respectively; the corresponding regression method-derived estimates were 8.96, 5.34, 5.37, and 2.98 MJ/kg DM, respectively. The direct method-derived estimates were not different (p>0.05) from those obtained using the regression method. Using substitution method, the nutrient apparent digestibility and effective energy values of corn silage varied with the increased corn silage substitution ratio (p<0.05). In addition, the corn silage estimates at the substitution ratio of 30% were similar to those estimated by direct and regression methods. CONCLUSION: In determining the energy value of corn silage using substitution method, there was a discrepancy between different substitution ratios, and the substitution ratio of 30% was more appropriate than 10% or 60% in the current study. The regression method based on multiple point substitution was more appropriate than single point substitution on energy evaluation of feedstuffs for beef cattle. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2018-06 2017-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5933983/ /pubmed/29268584 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0538 Text en Copyright © 2018 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Wei, Ming Chen, Zhiqiang Wei, Shengjuan Geng, Guangduo Yan, Peishi Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle |
title | Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle |
title_full | Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle |
title_fullStr | Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle |
title_short | Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle |
title_sort | comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5933983/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29268584 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0538 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weiming comparisonamongmethodsofeffectiveenergyevaluationofcornsilageforbeefcattle AT chenzhiqiang comparisonamongmethodsofeffectiveenergyevaluationofcornsilageforbeefcattle AT weishengjuan comparisonamongmethodsofeffectiveenergyevaluationofcornsilageforbeefcattle AT gengguangduo comparisonamongmethodsofeffectiveenergyevaluationofcornsilageforbeefcattle AT yanpeishi comparisonamongmethodsofeffectiveenergyevaluationofcornsilageforbeefcattle |